Literature DB >> 14529995

Mass regression in aortic stenosis after valve replacement with small size pericardial bioprosthesis.

Giordano Tasca1, Federico Brunelli, Marco Cirillo, Andrea Amaducci, Zen Mhagna, Giovanni Troise, Eugenio Quaini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to determine whether left ventricular mass regression is influenced by valve size after the implantation of a Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (CEP) pericardial bioprosthesis for pure aortic stenosis.
METHODS: Patients receiving 19-mm, 21-mm, and 23-mm CEP aortic valves underwent echocardiography preoperatively and at least 1 year after surgery (mean, 2.3 +/- 1 years) and the echocardiograms were compared within and between groups.
RESULTS: The study involved a total of 88 patients: 34 receiving 19-mm CEPs, 29 receiving 21-mm CEPs, and 25 receiving 23-mm CEPs. The mean postoperative prosthetic gradients were respectively 20.6 +/- 6.6 mm Hg, 17.9 +/- 5.8 mm Hg, and 13.2 +/- 4.1 mm Hg (p = 0.0001); the mean postoperative valve areas were respectively 1.24 +/- 0.16 cm(2), 1.45 +/- 0.2 cm(2), and 1.63 +/- 0.21 cm(2) (p = 0.0001). In comparison with the preoperative echocardiographic measurements absolute left ventricular mass significantly decreased by -54.1 +/- 48.8 g, -54.1 +/- 55.1 g, and -74.4 +/- 57.4 g respectively with no statistically significant between-group difference (analysis of variance) but ventricular septum and posterior wall thickness significantly decreased in each group (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of 19-mm, 21-mm, and 23-mm CEP aortic prostheses significantly reduces left ventricular mass without any size-related differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14529995     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00823-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  9 in total

Review 1.  A 44-year experience of prosthetic heart valve implantation at Niigata University Hospital.

Authors:  Jun-ichi Hayashi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 2.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention.

Authors:  P Pibarot; J G Dumesnil
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Patient-prosthesis mismatch may be irrelevant after aortic valve replacement with the 19-mm Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis in patients aged 65 years or older.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Sakamoto; Kazuhiro Hashimoto; Hiroshi Okuyama; Tatsuumi Sasaki; Hiromitsu Takakura; Katsuhisa Onoguchi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 1.731

4.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact of 2D-transthoracic echocardiography versus 3D-transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  Cristina da Silva; Anders Sahlen; Reidar Winter; Magnus Bäck; Andreas Rück; Magnus Settergren; Aristomenis Manouras; Kambiz Shahgaldi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Early results of Bentall-type operations during the last 10 years: comparison of mechanical valves and stentless bioprostheses.

Authors:  Koki Nakamura; Tomohiro Asai; Mikiko Murakami; Yosuke Saitoh; Hiroki Yamaguchi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-01

Review 6.  Factors affecting left ventricular remodeling after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. An overview.

Authors:  Emmanuel Villa; Giovanni Troise; Marco Cirillo; Federico Brunelli; Margherita Dalla Tomba; Zen Mhagna; Giordano Tasca; Eugenio Quaini
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 2.062

7.  Bovine pericardial versus porcine stented replacement mitral valves: early hemodynamic performance and clinical results of a randomized comparison of the Perimount and the Mosaic valves.

Authors:  Bo Fu; Xiankun Liu; Runsheng Wei; Qingliang Chen; Zhigang Guo; Nan Jiang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Determinants of clinical improvement after surgical replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation for isolated aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Cristina Gavina; Alexandra Gonçalves; Carlos Almeria; Rosana Hernandez; Adelino Leite-Moreira; Francisco Rocha-Gonçalves; José Zamorano
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 2.062

9.  A Retrospective Comparison of Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes between Two Differently Designed Aortic Bioprostheses for Small Aortic Annuli.

Authors:  Do Jung Kim; Sak Lee; Hyun-Chel Joo; Young-Nam Youn; Kyung-Jong Yoo; Seung Hyun Lee
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.