Literature DB >> 16194942

Visual memory for objects in natural scenes: from fixations to object files.

Benjamin W Tatler1, Iain D Gilchrist, Michael F Land.   

Abstract

Object descriptions are extracted and retained across saccades when observers view natural scenes. We investigated whether particular object properties are encoded and the stability of the resulting memories. We tested immediate recall of multiple types of information from real-world scenes and from computer-presented images of the same scenes. The relationship between fixations and properties of object memory was investigated. Position information was encoded and accumulated from multiple fixations. In contrast, identity and colour were encoded but did not require direct fixation and did not accumulate. In the current experiments, participants were unable to recall any information about shape or relative distances between objects. In addition, where information was encoded we found differential patterns of stability. Data from viewing real scenes and images were highly consistent, with stronger effects in the real-world conditions. Our findings imply that object files are not dependent upon the encoding of any particular object property and so are robust to dynamic visual environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16194942     DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  22 in total

1.  Visually-guided behavior of homonymous hemianopes in a naturalistic task.

Authors:  Tim Martin; Meghan E Riley; Kristin N Kelly; Mary Hayhoe; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Priorities for selection and representation in natural tasks.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Yoriko Hirose; Sarah K Finnegan; Riina Pievilainen; Clare Kirtley; Alan Kennedy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Vision and the representation of the surroundings in spatial memory.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Michael F Land
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Refixation control in free viewing: a specialized mechanism divulged by eye-movement-related brain activity.

Authors:  Andrey R Nikolaev; Radha Nila Meghanathan; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The interplay of episodic and semantic memory in guiding repeated search in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-21

7.  Temporal eye movement strategies during naturalistic viewing.

Authors:  Helena X Wang; Jeremy Freeman; Elisha P Merriam; Uri Hasson; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Seek and you shall remember: scene semantics interact with visual search to build better memories.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Jeremy M Wolfe; Melissa L H Võ
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  When does repeated search in scenes involve memory? Looking at versus looking for objects in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The strategic retention of task-relevant objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Ashleigh M Maxcey-Richard; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.