Literature DB >> 18053848

Visually-guided behavior of homonymous hemianopes in a naturalistic task.

Tim Martin1, Meghan E Riley, Kristin N Kelly, Mary Hayhoe, Krystel R Huxlin.   

Abstract

The gaze behavior of homonymous hemianopes differs from that of visually intact observers when performing simple laboratory tasks. To test whether such compensatory behavior is also evident during naturalistic tasks, we analyzed the gaze patterns of three long-standing hemianopes and four visually intact controls while they assembled wooden models. No significant differences in task performance, saccade dynamics or spatial distribution of gaze were observed. Hemianopes made more look-ahead fixations than controls and their gaze sequences were less predictable. Thus hemianopes displayed none of the compensatory gaze strategies seen in laboratory tasks. Instead, their gaze patterns suggest greater updating of, and greater reliance on a spatial representation.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18053848      PMCID: PMC2725520          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.09.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  35 in total

1.  Visual function in patients with homonymous hemianopial II. Oculomotor mechanisms.

Authors:  M M GASSEL; D WILLIAMS
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1963-03       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Square-root relations between main saccadic parameters.

Authors:  S Lebedev; P Van Gelder; W H Tsui
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Eye-fixation patterns in homonymous hemianopia and unilateral spatial neglect.

Authors:  S Ishiai; T Furukawa; H Tsukagoshi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation.

Authors:  L Weiskrantz; E K Warrington; M D Sanders; J Marshall
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Visual searching in normal and brain-damaged subjects (contribution to the study of unilateral inattention).

Authors:  F Chédru; M Leblanc; F Lhermitte
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Homonymous hemianopias: clinical-anatomic correlations in 904 cases.

Authors:  X Zhang; S Kedar; M J Lynn; N J Newman; V Biousse
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  The persistence of object file representations.

Authors:  Nicholaus S Noles; Brian J Scholl; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-02

8.  Scanning the visual world: a study of patients with homonymous hemianopia.

Authors:  A L Pambakian; D S Wooding; N Patel; A B Morland; C Kennard; S K Mannan
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Saccadic eye movement strategies in patients with homonymous hemianopia.

Authors:  O Meienberg; W H Zangemeister; M Rosenberg; W F Hoyt; L Stark
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Short-term adaptation of eye movements in patients with visual hemifield defects indicates high level control of human scanpath.

Authors:  W H Zangemeister; U Oechsner; C Freksa
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  12 in total

1.  Driving simulation in the clinic: testing visual exploratory behavior in daily life activities in patients with visual field defects.

Authors:  Johanna Hamel; Antje Kraft; Sven Ohl; Sophie De Beukelaer; Heinrich J Audebert; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Hemianopic and quadrantanopic field loss, eye and head movements, and driving.

Authors:  Joanne M Wood; Gerald McGwin; Jennifer Elgin; Michael S Vaphiades; Ronald A Braswell; Dawn K DeCarlo; Lanning B Kline; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  Driving with homonymous visual field loss: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Rehabilitation of damage to the visual brain.

Authors:  S Ajina; C Kennard
Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 2.607

5.  Driving with hemianopia: IV. Head scanning and detection at intersections in a simulator.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers; Egor Ananyev; Aaron J Mandel; Robert B Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Homonymous Visual Field Loss and Its Impact on Visual Exploration: A Supermarket Study.

Authors:  Enkelejda Kasneci; Katrin Sippel; Martin Heister; Katrin Aehling; Wolfgang Rosenstiel; Ulrich Schiefer; Elena Papageorgiou
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Mobile gaze tracking system for outdoor walking behavioral studies.

Authors:  Matteo Tomasi; Shrinivas Pundlik; Alex R Bowers; Eli Peli; Gang Luo
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Gaze movements and spatial working memory in collision avoidance: a traffic intersection task.

Authors:  Gregor Hardiess; Sabrina Hansmann-Roth; Hanspeter A Mallot
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Testing for optic ataxia in a blind field.

Authors:  Aarlenne Z Khan; Laure Pisella; Ludovic Delporte; Gilles Rode; Yves Rossetti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Motor Vehicle Collision Involvement among Persons with Hemianopia and Quadrantanopia.

Authors:  Gerald McGwin; Joanne Wood; Carrie Huisingh; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Geriatrics (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.