Literature DB >> 21242146

Vision and the representation of the surroundings in spatial memory.

Benjamin W Tatler1, Michael F Land.   

Abstract

One of the paradoxes of vision is that the world as it appears to us and the image on the retina at any moment are not much like each other. The visual world seems to be extensive and continuous across time. However, the manner in which we sample the visual environment is neither extensive nor continuous. How does the brain reconcile these differences? Here, we consider existing evidence from both static and dynamic viewing paradigms together with the logical requirements of any representational scheme that would be able to support active behaviour. While static scene viewing paradigms favour extensive, but perhaps abstracted, memory representations, dynamic settings suggest sparser and task-selective representation. We suggest that in dynamic settings where movement within extended environments is required to complete a task, the combination of visual input, egocentric and allocentric representations work together to allow efficient behaviour. The egocentric model serves as a coding scheme in which actions can be planned, but also offers a potential means of providing the perceptual stability that we experience.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21242146      PMCID: PMC3030831          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  54 in total

1.  Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  B Bridgeman; D Hendry; L Stark
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The relationship between change detection and recognition of centrally attended objects in motion pictures.

Authors:  Bonnie L Angelone; Daniel T Levin; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Panoramic search: the interaction of memory and vision in search through a familiar scene.

Authors:  Aude Oliva; Jeremy M Wolfe; Helga C Arsenio
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements.

Authors:  J R Duhamel; C L Colby; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Accumulation and persistence of memory for natural scenes.

Authors:  David Melcher
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  What you see is what you need.

Authors:  Jochen Triesch; Dana H Ballard; Mary M Hayhoe; Brian T Sullivan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading?

Authors:  G W McConkie; D Zola
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-03

8.  Viewpoint dependency in the recognition of dynamic scenes.

Authors:  Bärbel Garsoffky; Stephan Schwan; Friedrich W Hesse
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 9.  Change blindness: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Daniel J Simons; Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Do we have an internal model of the outside world?

Authors:  Michael F Land
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Optimal multimodal integration in spatial localization.

Authors:  Martina Poletti; David C Burr; Michele Rucci
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Priorities for selection and representation in natural tasks.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Yoriko Hirose; Sarah K Finnegan; Riina Pievilainen; Clare Kirtley; Alan Kennedy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Scene grammar shapes the way we interact with objects, strengthens memories, and speeds search.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Melissa L-H Võ
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Visual stability.

Authors:  David Melcher
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Spatiotopic coding and remapping in humans.

Authors:  David C Burr; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Presaccadic motion integration between current and future retinotopic locations of attended objects.

Authors:  Martin Szinte; Donatas Jonikaitis; Martin Rolfs; Patrick Cavanagh; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Recentering bias for temporal saccades only: Evidence from binocular recordings of eye movements.

Authors:  Jérôme Tagu; Karine Doré-Mazars; Judith Vergne; Christelle Lemoine-Lardennois; Dorine Vergilino-Perez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The strategic retention of task-relevant objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Ashleigh M Maxcey-Richard; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Forgetting what was where: the fragility of object-location binding.

Authors:  Yoni Pertzov; Mia Yuan Dong; Muy-Cheng Peich; Masud Husain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.