Literature DB >> 12906192

Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.

Ehsan Samei1.   

Abstract

Two general types of phosphor screens are currently used in indirect digital radiographic systems: structured phosphor screens and turbid phosphor screens. The purpose of the study was to experimentally compare the image quality characteristics of two flat-panel digital radiography detectors with similar electronics and pixel sizes (0.127 mm), but otherwise equipped with the two types of screens (0.6-mm-thick structured CsI and Lanex Regular). The presampled modulation transfer functions (MTFs) of the detectors were assessed using an edge method. The noise power spectra (NPS) were measured by two-dimensional Fourier analysis of uniformly-exposed radiographs at 50-100 kVp with 19 mm added Al filtration. The detective quantum efficiencies (DQEs) were assessed from the MTF, the NPS, and estimates of the ideal signal-to-noise ratio. The MTF measures of the two detectors were generally similar above a spatial frequency of 2 mm(-1), with approximately 2.5 and approximately 3.8 mm(-1) spatial frequencies corresponding to 0.2 MTF and 0.1 MTF, respectively. Below 2 mm(-1), the MTF for the CsI-based detector was slightly higher by an average of 0.07. At 70 kVp, the measured DQE values in the diagonal (and axial) direction(s) at spatial frequencies of 0.15 mm(-1) and 2.5 mm(-1) were 78% (78%) and 26% (20%) for the CsI-based detector, and 20% (20%) and 7% (6%) for the Lanex-based detector, respectively. The comparative findings experimentally confirm that in indirect flat-panel detectors, structured phosphor screens provide a more favorable tradeoff between resolution and noise compared to turbid-phosphor screens, effectively increasing the detection efficiency of the detector without a negative impact on the detector's spatial resolution response.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12906192     DOI: 10.1118/1.1578772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  19 in total

1.  Solid-state fluoroscopic imager for high-resolution angiography: parallel-cascaded linear systems analysis.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Solid-state fluoroscopic imager for high-resolution angiography: physical characteristics of an 8 cm x 8 cm experimental prototype.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Steven K Onishi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Contrast-detail evaluation and dose assessment of eight digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice.

Authors:  Wouter J H Veldkamp; Lucia J M Kroft; Mireille V Boot; Bart J A Mertens; Jacob Geleijns
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Assessment of detective quantum efficiency: intercomparison of a recently introduced international standard with prior methods.

Authors:  Nicole T Ranger; Ehsan Samei; James T Dobbins; Carl E Ravin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The Solid-State X-Ray Image Intensifier (SSXII): An EMCCD-Based X-Ray Detector.

Authors:  Andrew Kuhls-Gilcrist; Girijesh Yadava; Vikas Patel; Amit Jain; Daniel R Bednarek; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2008

6.  Effective DQE (eDQE) and speed of digital radiographic systems: an experimental methodology.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Nicole T Ranger; Alistair MacKenzie; Ian D Honey; James T Dobbins; Carl E Ravin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Development of quality control system for flat-panel detectors.

Authors:  Atsushi Teramoto; Takahiko Kajihara; Shoichi Suzuki; Kazuo Kinoshita; Masatoshi Tsuzaka; Hiroshi Fujita
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-03-17

8.  A comparative analysis of OTF, NPS, and DQE in energy integrating and photon counting digital x-ray detectors.

Authors:  Raymond J Acciavatti; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Structural noise from automatic exposure control device and its relationship to X-ray tube voltage used for calibration of a flat-panel detector system.

Authors:  Masayoshi Mizuta; Hiroyuki Akazawa; Toshifumi Kasai; Shigeru Sanada; Shuji Abe; Shigeki Mitou
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-08-23

10.  Relation between one- and two-dimensional noise power spectra of magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Yuki Ichinoseki; Yoshio Machida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-10-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.