Literature DB >> 16084886

Parents' conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision.

Robert D Nachtigall1, Gay Becker, Carrie Friese, Anneliese Butler, Kirstin MacDougall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain what couples think about their embryos and how they approach making a decision about disposition in light of the fact that the disposition of unused frozen embryos has significant implications for medical research and embryo donation.
DESIGN: Ethnographic qualitative interview study.
SETTING: Academic research environment. PATIENT(S): Fifty-eight couples who had conceived using a donor oocyte and had at least one frozen embryo in storage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Tape-recorded interviews with 58 wives and 37 husbands were transcribed and analyzed for emergent themes. RESULT(S): With an average of 7.1 embryos per couple, after an average of 4.2 years of storage, 72% of couples with frozen embryos had not reached a disposition decision. Most couples had not anticipated or appreciated the consequences of having surplus embryos. Parents variously conceptualized frozen embryos as biologic tissue, living entities, "virtual" children having interests that must be considered and protected, siblings of their living children, genetic or psychological "insurance policies," and symbolic reminders of their past infertility. CONCLUSION(S): The disposition decision is not only a significant and frequently unresolved issue for couples with stored frozen embryos, but their deeply personal conceptualizations of their embryos contributes to their ambivalence, uncertainty, and difficulty in reaching a decision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16084886      PMCID: PMC2811165          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.01.134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

1.  The disposition of unused frozen embryos.

Authors:  S C Klock; S Sheinin; R R Kazer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Donating spare embryos for embryonic stem-cell research.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Cryopreserved embryos in the United States and their availability for research.

Authors:  David I Hoffman; Gail L Zellman; C Christine Fair; Jacob F Mayer; Joyce G Zeitz; William E Gibbons; Thomas G Turner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Donation of frozen embryos after in vitro fertilization is uncommon.

Authors:  C V Hounshell; R J Chetkowski
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Six year follow-up of cryopreserved human embryos.

Authors:  J Lornage; H Chorier; D Boulieu; C Mathieu; J C Czyba
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  Ethical and legal issues in human embryo donation.

Authors:  J A Robertson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 7.329

  6 in total
  17 in total

1.  Impedance of novel therapeutic technologies: the case of stem cells.

Authors:  David G Zacharias; Timothy J Nelson; Paul S Mueller; C Christopher Hook
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.689

2.  Donation of surplus frozen embryos for stem cell research or fertility treatment-should medical professionals and healthcare institutions be allowed to exercise undue influence on the informed decision of their former patients?

Authors:  Boon Chin Heng
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  What do patients want? Expectations and perceptions of IVF clinic information and support regarding frozen embryo disposition.

Authors:  Robert D Nachtigall; Kirstin Mac Dougall; Matthew Lee; Jennifer Harrington; Gay Becker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Human embryos and eggs: from long-term storage to biobanking.

Authors:  Françoise Baylis; Heather Widdows
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015-12

5.  Of research and reproduction: defining embryo 'Research' in Canada.

Authors:  Alana Cattapan; Dave Snow
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015-12

6.  How couples who have undergone in vitro fertilization decide what to do with surplus frozen embryos.

Authors:  Robert D Nachtigall; Kirstin Mac Dougall; Jennifer Harrington; Julia Duff; Matthew Lee; Gay Becker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Discarding IVF embryos: reporting on global practices.

Authors:  M Simopoulou; K Sfakianoudis; P Giannelou; A Rapani; E Maziotis; P Tsioulou; S Grigoriadis; E Simopoulos; D Mantas; M Lambropoulou; M Koutsilieris; K Pantos; J C Harper
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  The decision-making process for the fate of frozen embryos by Japanese infertile women: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shizuko Takahashi; Misao Fujita; Akihisa Fujimoto; Toshihiro Fujiwara; Tetsu Yano; Osamu Tsutsumi; Yuji Taketani; Akira Akabayashi
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Fresh embryo donation for human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research: the experiences and values of IVF couples asked to be embryo donors.

Authors:  E Haimes; K Taylor
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Embryo cryopreservation and utilization in the United States from 2004-2013.

Authors:  Mindy S Christianson; Judy E Stern; Fangbai Sun; Heping Zhang; Aaron K Styer; Wendy Vitek; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.