Literature DB >> 12738496

Cryopreserved embryos in the United States and their availability for research.

David I Hoffman1, Gail L Zellman, C Christine Fair, Jacob F Mayer, Joyce G Zeitz, William E Gibbons, Thomas G Turner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the number of embryos stored at assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinics in the United States and their current disposition.
DESIGN: A targeted survey instrument sent by the SART-RAND team to all medical practices providing in vitro fertilization services in the United States.
RESULTS: The SART-RAND team surveyed all 430 ART practices in the United States. Of these practices, 340 returned surveys for analysis. The data from these surveys were merged with data taken from the 1999 SART dataset, which contains information about practice size and success rates. Responding clinics reported a total of 396,526 embryos in storage as of April 11, 2002. The vast majority of the embryos (88.2%) were targeted for patient use. Small numbers of embryos were available for research, donation, destruction, quality assurance, or other uses.
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 400,000 embryos are stored in the United States, the majority of which (88.2%) are targeted for patient use. Few are available for research (2.8%), limiting possible conversion into embryonic stem cell lines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12738496     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00172-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  23 in total

1.  Contesting estimates of cryopreserved embryos in the United States.

Authors:  Dave Snow; Alana Cattapan; Françoise Baylis
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  The importance of valid disclosures in the human embryonic stem cell research debate.

Authors:  J L Sherley
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.831

3.  The California stem cell initiative: persuasion, politics, and public science.

Authors:  Joel W Adelson; Joanna K Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The procurement of cells for the derivation of human embryonic stem cell lines for therapeutic use: recommendations for good practice.

Authors:  Alison Murdoch; Peter Braude; Aidan Courtney; Daniel Brison; Charles Hunt; James Lawford-Davies; Harry Moore; Glyn Stacey; Sebastian Sethe
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.739

5.  Correcting misperceptions about cryopreserved embryos and stem cell research.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Lomax; Alan O Trounson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Heterologous embryo transfer: Magisterial answers and metaphysical questions.

Authors:  Michel Accad
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2014-02

7.  Parents' conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision.

Authors:  Robert D Nachtigall; Gay Becker; Carrie Friese; Anneliese Butler; Kirstin MacDougall
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Recent trends in embryo disposition choices made by patients following in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Vinita M Alexander; Joan K Riley; Emily S Jungheim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  An alternative proposal to the destruction of abandoned human embryos.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Arthur L Caplan
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 10.  Oocyte cryopreservation: is it time to remove its experimental label?

Authors:  Nicole Noyes; Jeffrey Boldt; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.