Literature DB >> 23067356

Impedance of novel therapeutic technologies: the case of stem cells.

David G Zacharias1, Timothy J Nelson, Paul S Mueller, C Christopher Hook.   

Abstract

Embryonic stem cell (ES) technology has advanced considerably within the past three decades and has gained prominent distinction within the emerging field of regenerative medicine. As it now enters the nascent stages of clinical application, many hopes and expectations arise along with questions as to where the technology will go. This paper evaluates the technical and practical obstacles that must be overcome before it can fully translate into the clinical context, the existence of strong opposition to the technology, political and legal barriers that have impeded its progression, and the role of healthcare reform in creating new social and economic priorities. In contrast to the technological imperative, a driving force seeking to implement the most recent scientific advances into medical practice, we refer to such translational obstacles as "technological impedance." Rather than expending inordinate effort to preserve existing systems that continue to possess major hurdles, we advocate fostering interdisciplinary approaches in the development of new generation platforms and embracing disruptive innovations that create solutions to technological impedance and move us forward in healthcare delivery. Clin Trans Sci 2012; Volume 5: 422-427.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23067356      PMCID: PMC5439797          DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00434.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Sci        ISSN: 1752-8054            Impact factor:   4.689


  83 in total

1.  Stem cells: Troublesome memories.

Authors:  Thomas P Zwaka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The path to personalized medicine.

Authors:  Margaret A Hamburg; Francis S Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The value of medical spending in the United States, 1960-2000.

Authors:  David M Cutler; Allison B Rosen; Sandeep Vijan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution.

Authors:  Nimet Maherali; Rupa Sridharan; Wei Xie; Jochen Utikal; Sarah Eminli; Katrin Arnold; Matthias Stadtfeld; Robin Yachechko; Jason Tchieu; Rudolf Jaenisch; Kathrin Plath; Konrad Hochedlinger
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  Induced pluripotent stem cells: an emerging theranostics platform.

Authors:  T J Nelson; A Terzic
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 6.  Will cell reprogramming resolve the embryonic stem cell controversy? A narrative review.

Authors:  Carl Power; John E J Rasko
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: a survey of couples' decisions and the factors influencing their choice.

Authors:  Karin Hammarberg; Leesa Tinney
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 8.  In vitro fertilization and stem cell harvesting from human embryos: the law and practice in the United States.

Authors:  C Christopher Hook
Journal:  Pol Arch Med Wewn       Date:  2010-07

9.  Derivation of completely cell culture-derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  A Nagy; J Rossant; R Nagy; W Abramow-Newerly; J C Roder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Fertility patients' views about frozen embryo disposition: results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey.

Authors:  Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Karen Steinhauser; Corrine Voils; Emily Namey; Carolyn Alexander; Brandon Bankowski; Robert Cook-Deegan; William C Dodson; Elena Gates; Emily S Jungheim; Peter G McGovern; Evan R Myers; Barbara Osborn; William Schlaff; Jeremy Sugarman; James A Tulsky; David Walmer; Ruth R Faden; Edward Wallach
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.