Literature DB >> 17019631

Donation of surplus frozen embryos for stem cell research or fertility treatment-should medical professionals and healthcare institutions be allowed to exercise undue influence on the informed decision of their former patients?

Boon Chin Heng.   

Abstract

The increasing availability of clinical assisted reproduction has led to an accumulated surplus of frozen embryos within fertility clinics worldwide. Couples that have attained success in clinical assisted reproduction, and have no further desire to reproduce; are often faced with an agonizing dilemma on what to do with their surplus frozen embryos-whether to simply discard them, or donate either for scientific research or to other infertile couples. There is a risk that persons or institutions directly involved in procuring donated embryos will prioritize their own interests over the informed choice of the patient to donate either for scientific research or to other infertile couples. Very often, formerly infertile couples who have attained reproductive success feel an overwhelming sense of gratitude to the fertility doctor handling their treatment. Hence, there is a risk of medical professionals exercising undue influence on their former patients, to sway the final decision to their preferred outcome. In the private practice setting, the preferred outcome would likely be donation for the treatment of other infertile couples; whilst in the case of medical professionals affiliated with research or academic institutions, the preferred outcome would likely be donation for stem cell research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17019631      PMCID: PMC3455101          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-006-9070-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  9 in total

Review 1.  The social implications of embryo cryopreservation.

Authors:  Brandon J Bankowski; Anne D Lyerly; Ruth R Faden; Edward E Wallach
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Anonymity of gamete donations debated.

Authors:  Tracy Hampton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The donation of gametes is possible without paying donors: experience of the French CECOS Federation. Centre for the cryopreservation of eggs and semen.

Authors:  J F Guerin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Destruction of cryopreserved embryos. UK law dictated the destruction of 3000 cryopreserved human embryos.

Authors:  R G Edwards; H K Beard
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Parents' conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision.

Authors:  Robert D Nachtigall; Gay Becker; Carrie Friese; Anneliese Butler; Kirstin MacDougall
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  A new Dutch Law regulating provision of identifying information of donors to offspring: background, content and impact.

Authors:  P M W Janssens; A H M Simons; R J van Kooij; E Blokzijl; G A J Dunselman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Embryo donation for medical research: attitudes and concerns of potential donors.

Authors:  Catherine A McMahon; Frances L Gibson; Garth I Leslie; Douglas M Saunders; Katherine A Porter; Christopher C Tennant
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: a survey of couples' decisions and the factors influencing their choice.

Authors:  Karin Hammarberg; Leesa Tinney
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Patients' attitudes towards donation of surplus cryopreserved embryos for treatment or research.

Authors:  S Bangsbøll; A Pinborg; C Yding Andersen; A Nyboe Andersen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 6.918

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  The ethics of moral compromise for stem cell research policy.

Authors:  Zubin Master; G K D Crozier
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2012-03

2.  What do patients want? Expectations and perceptions of IVF clinic information and support regarding frozen embryo disposition.

Authors:  Robert D Nachtigall; Kirstin Mac Dougall; Matthew Lee; Jennifer Harrington; Gay Becker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Ethical and policy issues surrounding the donation of cryopreserved and fresh embryos for human embryonic stem cell research.

Authors:  Cynthia B Cohen
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 5.739

4.  Effects of group culture on the development of discarded human embryos and the construction of human embryonic stem cell lines.

Authors:  Bo Sun; Wenzhu Yu; Fang Wang; Wenyan Song; Haixia Jin; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Embryo futures and stem cell research: the management of informed uncertainty.

Authors:  Kathryn Ehrich; Clare Williams; Bobbie Farsides; Rosamund Scott
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2011-08-03

6.  Fresh or frozen? Classifying 'spare' embryos for donation to human embryonic stem cell research.

Authors:  Kathryn Ehrich; Clare Williams; Bobbie Farsides
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Can the difference in medical fees for self and donor freeze-thaw embryo transfer cycle, be in fact a cover-up for the sale of donated human embryos?

Authors:  Boon Chin Heng
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 2.464

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.