Literature DB >> 19700150

How couples who have undergone in vitro fertilization decide what to do with surplus frozen embryos.

Robert D Nachtigall1, Kirstin Mac Dougall, Jennifer Harrington, Julia Duff, Matthew Lee, Gay Becker.   

Abstract

In a qualitative interview study of 77 families with stored frozen embryos, we found that while embryo disposition decision making was influenced by individual life circumstances, embryo quantity/quality, personal values, embryo conceptualization, and clinic information, it was a stepwise process that could be represented as three sequential questions: (1) Will the embryos be used for additional attempts at conception? If not, (2) Will the embryos remain in storage? And if not, (3) Will the embryos be donated to other people or to science, or will they be destroyed? While almost two-thirds (63%) of participants kept their embryos in storage after 5 years, either passively through disagreement or indecision or actively to maintain embryo potential, avert feelings of loss, or as psychological or genetic "insurance," IVF clinic support and detailed information about options motivated families to make disposition decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19700150      PMCID: PMC2789837          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.06.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  20 in total

1.  Embryo donation programs and policies in North America: survey results and implications for health and mental health professionals.

Authors:  S A Kingsberg; L D Applegarth; J W Janata
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Parents' conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision.

Authors:  Robert D Nachtigall; Gay Becker; Carrie Friese; Anneliese Butler; Kirstin MacDougall
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Establishment of a successful donor embryo program: medical, ethical, and policy issues.

Authors:  B J Van Voorhis; D M Grinstead; A E Sparks; J L Gerard; R F Weir
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Parent identity and 'virtual' children: why patients discard rather than donate unused embryos.

Authors:  Sheryl de Lacey
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Embryo donation: attitudes toward donation procedures and factors predicting willingness to donate.

Authors:  Christopher R Newton; Ann McDermid; Francis Tekpetey; Ian S Tummon
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  The fate of cryopreserved human embryos approaching their legal limit of storage within a West Australian in-vitro fertilization clinic.

Authors:  N Darlington; P Matson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Patients' attitudes towards donation of surplus cryopreserved embryos for treatment or research.

Authors:  S Bangsbøll; A Pinborg; C Yding Andersen; A Nyboe Andersen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Patient attitudes to donation of embryos for research in Western Australia.

Authors:  Peter J Burton; Katherine Sanders
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Psychological study of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer participants' attitudes toward the destiny of their supernumerary embryos.

Authors:  C Laruelle; Y Englert
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Fertility patients' views about frozen embryo disposition: results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey.

Authors:  Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Karen Steinhauser; Corrine Voils; Emily Namey; Carolyn Alexander; Brandon Bankowski; Robert Cook-Deegan; William C Dodson; Elena Gates; Emily S Jungheim; Peter G McGovern; Evan R Myers; Barbara Osborn; William Schlaff; Jeremy Sugarman; James A Tulsky; David Walmer; Ruth R Faden; Edward Wallach
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  13 in total

1.  Contesting estimates of cryopreserved embryos in the United States.

Authors:  Dave Snow; Alana Cattapan; Françoise Baylis
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Correcting misperceptions about cryopreserved embryos and stem cell research.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Lomax; Alan O Trounson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Bioethics in China: No wild east.

Authors:  Douglas Sipp; Duanqing Pei
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  What do patients want? Expectations and perceptions of IVF clinic information and support regarding frozen embryo disposition.

Authors:  Robert D Nachtigall; Kirstin Mac Dougall; Matthew Lee; Jennifer Harrington; Gay Becker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Recent trends in embryo disposition choices made by patients following in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Vinita M Alexander; Joan K Riley; Emily S Jungheim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Expensive but worth it: older parents' attitudes and opinions about the costs and insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Robert D Nachtigall; Kirstin MacDougall; Anne C Davis; Yewoubdar Beyene
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Human embryos and eggs: from long-term storage to biobanking.

Authors:  Françoise Baylis; Heather Widdows
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015-12

8.  Decisional conflict and the disposition of frozen embryos: implications for informed consent.

Authors:  A D Lyerly; S Nakagawa; M Kuppermann
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  The decision-making process for the fate of frozen embryos by Japanese infertile women: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shizuko Takahashi; Misao Fujita; Akihisa Fujimoto; Toshihiro Fujiwara; Tetsu Yano; Osamu Tsutsumi; Yuji Taketani; Akira Akabayashi
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Embryo cryopreservation and utilization in the United States from 2004-2013.

Authors:  Mindy S Christianson; Judy E Stern; Fangbai Sun; Heping Zhang; Aaron K Styer; Wendy Vitek; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.