Literature DB >> 16060777

Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model?

Robert W Hughes1, François Vachon, Dylan M Jones.   

Abstract

A novel attentional capture effect is reported in which visual-verbal serial recall was disrupted if a single deviation in the interstimulus interval occurred within otherwise regularly presented task-irrelevant spoken items. The degree of disruption was the same whether the temporal deviant was embedded in a sequence made up of a repeating item or a sequence of changing items. Moreover, the effect was evident during the presentation of the to-be-remembered sequence but not during rehearsal just prior to recall, suggesting that the encoding of sequences is particularly susceptible. The results suggest that attentional capture is due to a violation of an algorithm rather than an aggregate-based neural model and further undermine an attentional capture-based account of the classical changing-state irrelevant sound effect. ((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16060777     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  32 in total

1.  New considerations for the cognitive locus of impairment in the irrelevant-sound effect.

Authors:  Kirk A Stokes; Karen M Arnell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-08

2.  High working memory capacity attenuates the deviation effect but not the changing-state effect: further support for the duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

Review 3.  The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-21

4.  The role of habituation and attentional orienting in the disruption of short-term memory performance.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Röer; Raoul Bell; Sandra Dentale; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-07

Review 5.  Auditory attentional capture: implicit and explicit approaches.

Authors:  Polly Dalton; Robert W Hughes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-19

6.  Aging increases distraction by auditory oddballs in visual, but not auditory tasks.

Authors:  Alicia Leiva; Fabrice B R Parmentier; Pilar Andrés
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-05-23

7.  Monitoring prediction errors facilitates cognition in action.

Authors:  John Plass; Simon Choi; Satoru Suzuki; Marcia Grabowecky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-11-12

8.  A central capacity limit to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays in working memory.

Authors:  J Scott Saults; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

Review 9.  High working memory capacity does not always attenuate distraction: Bayesian evidence in support of the null hypothesis.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; John E Marsh; Anatole Nöstl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

10.  Sound source location modulates the irrelevant-sound effect.

Authors:  Axel Buchner; Raoul Bell; Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.