Literature DB >> 20551344

High working memory capacity attenuates the deviation effect but not the changing-state effect: further support for the duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.

Patrik Sörqvist1.   

Abstract

Serial short-term memory is impaired by background sound, at least when a sound element suddenly deviates from an otherwise repetitive sequence (the deviation effect) and when each sound element in the sequence differs from the preceding one (the changing-state effect). Two competing theories have been proposed to explain these effects: One suggests that both effects are caused by the same mechanism (i.e., attentional resources being depleted by the sound), and the other suggests that the deviation effect is caused by attentional capture and that the changing-state effect is caused by interference between order processes. The present investigation found that working memory capacity predicts susceptibility to the deviation effect, but not to the changing-state effect, both when speech items (Experiment 1) and when tones (Experiment 2) produce the disruption. These results suggest that the two effects are caused by different mechanisms and support the duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20551344     DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.5.651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  25 in total

1.  Auditory novelty oddball allows reliable distinction of top-down and bottom-up processes of attention.

Authors:  S Debener; C Kranczioch; C S Herrmann; A K Engel
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  The irrelevant sound phenomenon revisited: what role for working memory capacity?

Authors:  C Philip Beaman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: individual differences in voluntary saccade control.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Josef C Schrock; Randall W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Coherence of the irrelevant-sound effect: individual profiles of short-term memory and susceptibility to task-irrelevant materials.

Authors:  Emily M Elliott; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-06

5.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

7.  Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model?

Authors:  Robert W Hughes; François Vachon; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  A sub-process view of working memory capacity: evidence from effects of speech on prose memory.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; Jessica K Ljungberg; Robert Ljung
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2010-02-24

Review 9.  Stimulus-dependent dopamine release in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Sverker Sikström; Göran Söderlund
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: the role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-11-12
View more
  21 in total

1.  The role of habituation and attentional orienting in the disruption of short-term memory performance.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Röer; Raoul Bell; Sandra Dentale; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-07

2.  Processing Complex Sounds Passing through the Rostral Brainstem: The New Early Filter Model.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Tom A Campbell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.

Authors:  Larissa Leist; Thomas Lachmann; Sabine J Schlittmeier; Markus Georgi; Maria Klatte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-10-03

4.  With No Attention Specifically Directed to It, Rhythmic Sound Does Not Automatically Facilitate Visual Task Performance.

Authors:  Jorg De Winne; Paul Devos; Marc Leman; Dick Botteldooren
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 5.  High working memory capacity does not always attenuate distraction: Bayesian evidence in support of the null hypothesis.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; John E Marsh; Anatole Nöstl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

6.  Early auditory evoked potential is modulated by selective attention and related to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  Ryan J Giuliano; Christina M Karns; Helen J Neville; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Working memory capacity modulates habituation rate: evidence from a cross-modal auditory distraction paradigm.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; Anatole Nöstl; Niklas Halin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

8.  Evidence for habituation of the irrelevant-sound effect on serial recall.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-05

9.  Erroneous and veridical recall are not two sides of the same coin: Evidence from semantic distraction in free recall.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Robert W Hughes; Patrik Sörqvist; C Philip Beaman; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  How Concentration Shields Against Distraction.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; John E Marsh
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.