Literature DB >> 24363092

The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review.

Fabrice B R Parmentier1.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated that rare and unexpected changes in an otherwise repetitive or structured sound sequence ineluctably break through selective attention and impact negatively on performance in an unrelated task. While the electrophysiological responses to unexpected sounds have been extensively studied, behavioral distraction has received relatively less attention until recently. In this paper, I review work examining the cognitive underpinnings of behavioral distraction by deviant sounds and highlight some of its key determinants. Evidence indicates that deviance distraction (1) derives from the time penalty associated with the involuntary orientation of attention to and away from the deviant sound and from resulting effects such as the reactivation of the relevant task set upon the presentation of the target stimulus; and (2) is mediated by a number of factors (some increasing distraction, such as aging or induced emotions; some decreasing it, such as a memory load or cognitive control). Contrary to the received view that deviants ineluctably elicit distraction, recent work demonstrates that it is contingent upon auditory distractors acting as unspecific warning signals in the service of goal-oriented behavior, and that deviants do not elicit distraction because they are rare but because they violate the cognitive system's predictions (which can be manipulated through implicit rule learning or explicit cueing). Evidence is also presented indicating that the capture of attention by spoken deviant sounds is followed by an involuntary evaluation of their semantic properties, the outcome of which can be robust enough to linger in working memory and interfere with subsequent behavior. Finally, I review studies suggesting that behavioral deviance distraction is not the mere byproduct of the mismatch negativity, P3a and re-orientation negativity electrophysiological responses and highlight a number of outstanding questions for future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24363092     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0534-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  141 in total

1.  Distraction and reorientation in children: a behavioral and ERP study.

Authors:  Nicole Wetzel; Stefan Berti; Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Automatic processing of rare versus novel auditory stimuli reveal different mechanisms of auditory change detection.

Authors:  Stefan Berti
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  The role of task preparation and task inhibition in age-related task-switching deficits.

Authors:  Vera Lawo; Andrea M Philipp; Stefanie Schuch; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-04-02

4.  Emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Judith Domínguez-Borràs; Manuel Garcia-Garcia; Carles Escera
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Memory trace formation for abstract auditory features and its consequences in different attentional contexts.

Authors:  Alexandra Bendixen; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2008-03-16       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  Mismatch negativity: deviance detection or the maintenance of the 'standard'.

Authors:  I Winkler; I Czigler
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  The counting Stroop: an interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging--validation study with functional MRI.

Authors:  G Bush; P J Whalen; B R Rosen; M A Jenike; S C McInerney; S L Rauch
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 8.  Early electrophysiological indicators for predictive processing in audition: a review.

Authors:  Alexandra Bendixen; Iria SanMiguel; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Cognitive control of involuntary attention and distraction in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Nicole Wetzel; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: the role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-11-12
View more
  38 in total

1.  Multitasking: Effects of processing multiple auditory feature patterns.

Authors:  Tova Miller; Sufen Chen; Wei Wei Lee; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  On the Globality of Motor Suppression: Unexpected Events and Their Influence on Behavior and Cognition.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Unexpected events disrupt visuomotor working memory and increase guessing.

Authors:  R Dawn Finzi; Bradley R Postle; Timothy F Brady; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04

4.  Editorial for special issue: "auditory attention: merging paradigms and perspectives".

Authors:  Alexandra Bendixen; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-18

Review 5.  Auditory attentional capture: implicit and explicit approaches.

Authors:  Polly Dalton; Robert W Hughes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-19

6.  Aging increases distraction by auditory oddballs in visual, but not auditory tasks.

Authors:  Alicia Leiva; Fabrice B R Parmentier; Pilar Andrés
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-05-23

7.  The fate of unattended stimuli and emotional habituation: Behavioral interference and cortical changes.

Authors:  Maurizio Codispoti; Andrea De Cesarei; Simone Biondi; Vera Ferrari
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Auditory stimulus has a larger effect on anticipatory postural adjustments in older than young adults during choice step reaction.

Authors:  Tatsunori Watanabe; Kotaro Saito; Kazuto Ishida; Shigeo Tanabe; Ippei Nojima
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Attentional bias on motor control: is motor inhibition influenced by attentional reorienting?

Authors:  Pauline M Hilt; Pasquale Cardellicchio
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-03-08

10.  Effects of explicit knowledge and predictability on auditory distraction and target performance.

Authors:  Caroline Max; Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger; Elyse Sussman
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.997

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.