Literature DB >> 17999578

A central capacity limit to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays in working memory.

J Scott Saults1, Nelson Cowan.   

Abstract

If working memory is limited by central capacity (e.g., the focus of attention; N. Cowan, 2001), then storage limits for information in a single modality should apply also to the simultaneous storage of information from different modalities. The authors investigated this by combining a visual-array comparison task with a novel auditory-array comparison task in 5 experiments. Participants were to remember only the visual, only the auditory (unimodal memory conditions), or both arrays (bimodal memory conditions). Experiments 1 and 2 showed significant dual-task tradeoffs for visual but not for auditory capacity. In Experiments 3-5, the authors eliminated modality-specific memory by using postperceptual masks. Dual-task costs occurred for both modalities, and the number of auditory and visual items remembered together was no more than the higher of the unimodal capacities (visual: 3-4 items). The findings suggest a central capacity supplemented by modality- or code-specific storage and point to avenues for further research on the role of processing in central storage. 2007 APA

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17999578      PMCID: PMC2621445          DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  61 in total

1.  A working memory workout: how to expand the focus of serial attention from one to four items in 10 hours or less.

Authors:  Paul Verhaeghen; John Cerella; Chandramallika Basak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Is the focus of attention in working memory expanded through practice?

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The time course of consolidation in visual working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Chunk limits and length limits in immediate recall: a reconciliation.

Authors:  Zhijian Chen; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Rethinking speed theories of cognitive development. Increasing the rate of recall without affecting accuracy.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Emily M Elliott; J Scott Saults; Lara D Nugent; Pinky Bomb; Anna Hismjatullina
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-01

6.  How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis.

Authors:  Akira Miyake; Naomi P Friedman; David A Rettinger; Priti Shah; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-12

7.  Preperceptual images, processing time, and perceptual units in auditory perception.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 8.  Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology.

Authors:  G S Halford; W H Wilson; S Phillips
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 12.579

9.  When do visual and verbal memories conflict? The importance of working-memory load and retrieval.

Authors:  Candice C Morey; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding?

Authors:  Richard J Allen; Alan D Baddeley; Graham J Hitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-05
View more
  72 in total

Review 1.  The focus of attention as observed in visual working memory tasks: making sense of competing claims.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  CNTRICS imaging biomarkers selection: Working memory.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Holly Moore; Derek E Nee; Dara S Manoach; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 3.  Modeling working memory: an interference model of complex span.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Stephan Lewandowsky; Simon Farrell; Christopher Jarrold; Martin Greaves
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

4.  Monkeys have a limited form of short-term memory in audition.

Authors:  Brian H Scott; Mortimer Mishkin; Pingbo Yin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Effects of dizocilpine (MK801) on olfactory span in rats.

Authors:  Dave A MacQueen; Laura Bullard; Mark Galizio
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 6.  Multiple concurrent thoughts: The meaning and developmental neuropsychology of working memory.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  Visual and verbal working memory loads interfere with scene-viewing.

Authors:  Deborah A Cronin; Candace E Peacock; John M Henderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Validation of the human odor span task: effects of nicotine.

Authors:  David A MacQueen; David J Drobes
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Attention to attributes and objects in working memory.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Christopher L Blume; J Scott Saults
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The relationship between working memory capacity and broad measures of cognitive ability in healthy adults and people with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Melissa K Johnson; Robert P McMahon; Benjamin M Robinson; Alexander N Harvey; Britta Hahn; Carly J Leonard; Steven J Luck; James M Gold
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.