Literature DB >> 30421944

Monitoring prediction errors facilitates cognition in action.

John Plass1, Simon Choi1, Satoru Suzuki1, Marcia Grabowecky1.   

Abstract

Cognition in action requires strategic allocation of attention between internal processes and the sensory environment. We hypothesized that this resource allocation could be facilitated by mechanisms that predict sensory results of self-generated actions. Sensory signals conforming to predictions would be safely ignored to facilitate focus on internally generated content, whereas those violating predictions would draw attention for additional scrutiny. During a visual-verbal serial digit-recall task, we varied the temporal relationship between task-irrelevant keypresses and auditory distractors so that the distractors were either temporally coupled or decoupled with keypresses. Consistent with our hypothesis, distractors were more likely to interfere with target maintenance and intrude into working memory when they were decoupled from keypresses, thereby violating action-based sensory predictions. Interference was maximal when sounds preceded keypresses, suggesting that stimuli were most distracting when their timing was inconsistent with expected action-sensation contingencies. In a follow-up experiment, neither auditory nor visual cues to distractor timing produced similar effects, suggesting a unique action-based mechanism. These results suggest that action-based sensory predictions are used to dynamically optimize attentional allocation during cognition in action. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30421944      PMCID: PMC6511482          DOI: 10.1037/xge0000519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  41 in total

Review 1.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Action effect anticipation: neurophysiological basis and functional consequences.

Authors:  Florian Waszak; Pedro Cardoso-Leite; Gethin Hughes
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Internalized timing of isochronous sounds is represented in neuromagnetic β oscillations.

Authors:  Takako Fujioka; Laurel J Trainor; Edward W Large; Bernhard Ross
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cognitive control of auditory distraction: impact of task difficulty, foreknowledge, and working memory capacity supports duplex-mechanism account.

Authors:  Robert W Hughes; Mark J Hurlstone; John E Marsh; François Vachon; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Internal models for motor control.

Authors:  M Kawato; D Wolpert
Journal:  Novartis Found Symp       Date:  1998

6.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Contrasting effects of changing rhythm and content on auditory distraction in immediate memory.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; C Philip Beaman
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2014-12-08

8.  Temporal orienting of attention is interfered by concurrent working memory updating.

Authors:  Mariagrazia Capizzi; Angel Correa; Daniel Sanabria
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Noise, unattended speech and short-term memory.

Authors:  P Salamé; A Baddeley
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Free-energy and the brain.

Authors:  Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Synthese       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 2.908

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.