Literature DB >> 15930498

A BAC-based physical map of the Drosophila buzzatii genome.

Josefa González1, Michael Nefedov, Ian Bosdet, Ferran Casals, Oriol Calvete, Alejandra Delprat, Heesun Shin, Readman Chiu, Carrie Mathewson, Natasja Wye, Roger A Hoskins, Jacqueline E Schein, Pieter de Jong, Alfredo Ruiz.   

Abstract

Large-insert genomic libraries facilitate cloning of large genomic regions, allow the construction of clone-based physical maps, and provide useful resources for sequencing entire genomes. Drosophila buzzatii is a representative species of the repleta group in the Drosophila subgenus, which is being widely used as a model in studies of genome evolution, ecological adaptation, and speciation. We constructed a Bacterial Artificial Chromosome (BAC) genomic library of D. buzzatii using the shuttle vector pTARBAC2.1. The library comprises 18,353 clones with an average insert size of 152 kb and an approximately 18x expected representation of the D. buzzatii euchromatic genome. We screened the entire library with six euchromatic gene probes and estimated the actual genome representation to be approximately 23x. In addition, we fingerprinted by restriction digestion and agarose gel electrophoresis a sample of 9555 clones, and assembled them using FingerPrint Contigs (FPC) software and manual editing into 345 contigs (mean of 26 clones per contig) and 670 singletons. Finally, we anchored 181 large contigs (containing 7788 clones) to the D. buzzatii salivary gland polytene chromosomes by in situ hybridization of 427 representative clones. The BAC library and a database with all the information regarding the high coverage BAC-based physical map described in this paper are available to the research community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15930498      PMCID: PMC1142479          DOI: 10.1101/gr.3263105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  27 in total

1.  A modular, positive selection bacterial artificial chromosome vector with multiple cloning sites.

Authors:  E Frengen; D Weichenhan; B Zhao; K Osoegawa; M van Geel; P J de Jong
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 5.736

2.  A BAC-based physical map of the major autosomes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R A Hoskins; C R Nelson; B P Berman; T R Laverty; R A George; L Ciesiolka; M Naeemuddin; A D Arenson; J Durbin; R G David; P E Tabor; M R Bailey; D R DeShazo; J Catanese; A Mammoser; K Osoegawa; P J de Jong; S E Celniker; R A Gibbs; G M Rubin; S E Scherer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  J M Ranz; F Casals; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  A bacterial artificial chromosome library for sequencing the complete human genome.

Authors:  K Osoegawa; A G Mammoser; C Wu; E Frengen; C Zeng; J J Catanese; P J de Jong
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Toward a physical map of Drosophila buzzatii. Use of randomly amplified polymorphic dna polymorphisms and sequence-tagged site landmarks.

Authors:  H Laayouni; M Santos; A Fontdevila
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Whole arm inversions of chromosome 4 in Drosophila species.

Authors:  L Podemski; C Ferrer; J Locke
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Contigs built with fingerprints, markers, and FPC V4.7.

Authors:  C Soderlund; S Humphray; A Dunham; L French
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Chromosomal elements evolve at different rates in the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Josefa González; José María Ranz; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M D Adams; S E Celniker; R A Holt; C A Evans; J D Gocayne; P G Amanatides; S E Scherer; P W Li; R A Hoskins; R F Galle; R A George; S E Lewis; S Richards; M Ashburner; S N Henderson; G G Sutton; J R Wortman; M D Yandell; Q Zhang; L X Chen; R C Brandon; Y H Rogers; R G Blazej; M Champe; B D Pfeiffer; K H Wan; C Doyle; E G Baxter; G Helt; C R Nelson; G L Gabor; J F Abril; A Agbayani; H J An; C Andrews-Pfannkoch; D Baldwin; R M Ballew; A Basu; J Baxendale; L Bayraktaroglu; E M Beasley; K Y Beeson; P V Benos; B P Berman; D Bhandari; S Bolshakov; D Borkova; M R Botchan; J Bouck; P Brokstein; P Brottier; K C Burtis; D A Busam; H Butler; E Cadieu; A Center; I Chandra; J M Cherry; S Cawley; C Dahlke; L B Davenport; P Davies; B de Pablos; A Delcher; Z Deng; A D Mays; I Dew; S M Dietz; K Dodson; L E Doup; M Downes; S Dugan-Rocha; B C Dunkov; P Dunn; K J Durbin; C C Evangelista; C Ferraz; S Ferriera; W Fleischmann; C Fosler; A E Gabrielian; N S Garg; W M Gelbart; K Glasser; A Glodek; F Gong; J H Gorrell; Z Gu; P Guan; M Harris; N L Harris; D Harvey; T J Heiman; J R Hernandez; J Houck; D Hostin; K A Houston; T J Howland; M H Wei; C Ibegwam; M Jalali; F Kalush; G H Karpen; Z Ke; J A Kennison; K A Ketchum; B E Kimmel; C D Kodira; C Kraft; S Kravitz; D Kulp; Z Lai; P Lasko; Y Lei; A A Levitsky; J Li; Z Li; Y Liang; X Lin; X Liu; B Mattei; T C McIntosh; M P McLeod; D McPherson; G Merkulov; N V Milshina; C Mobarry; J Morris; A Moshrefi; S M Mount; M Moy; B Murphy; L Murphy; D M Muzny; D L Nelson; D R Nelson; K A Nelson; K Nixon; D R Nusskern; J M Pacleb; M Palazzolo; G S Pittman; S Pan; J Pollard; V Puri; M G Reese; K Reinert; K Remington; R D Saunders; F Scheeler; H Shen; B C Shue; I Sidén-Kiamos; M Simpson; M P Skupski; T Smith; E Spier; A C Spradling; M Stapleton; R Strong; E Sun; R Svirskas; C Tector; R Turner; E Venter; A H Wang; X Wang; Z Y Wang; D A Wassarman; G M Weinstock; J Weissenbach; S M Williams; K C Worley; D Wu; S Yang; Q A Yao; J Ye; R F Yeh; J S Zaveri; M Zhan; G Zhang; Q Zhao; L Zheng; X H Zheng; F N Zhong; W Zhong; X Zhou; S Zhu; X Zhu; H O Smith; R A Gibbs; E W Myers; G M Rubin; J C Venter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The transposable elements of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatin: a genomics perspective.

Authors:  Joshua S Kaminker; Casey M Bergman; Brent Kronmiller; Joseph Carlson; Robert Svirskas; Sandeep Patel; Erwin Frise; David A Wheeler; Suzanna E Lewis; Gerald M Rubin; Michael Ashburner; Susan E Celniker
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-12-23       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  15 in total

1.  The 19 genomes of Drosophila: a BAC library resource for genus-wide and genome-scale comparative evolutionary research.

Authors:  Xiang Song; Jose Luis Goicoechea; Jetty S S Ammiraju; Meizhong Luo; Ruifeng He; Jinke Lin; So-Jeong Lee; Nicholas Sisneros; Tom Watts; David A Kudrna; Wolfgang Golser; Elizabeth Ashley; Kristi Collura; Michele Braidotti; Yeisoo Yu; Luciano M Matzkin; Bryant F McAllister; Therese Ann Markow; Rod A Wing
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Dense gene physical maps of the non-model species Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  Dorcas J Orengo; Eva Puerma; Montserrat Papaceit; Carmen Segarra; Montserrat Aguadé
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Testing chromosomal phylogenies and inversion breakpoint reuse in Drosophila.

Authors:  Josefa González; Ferran Casals; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Cotton genome mapping with new microsatellites from Acala 'Maxxa' BAC-ends.

Authors:  James E Frelichowski; Michael B Palmer; Dorrie Main; Jeffrey P Tomkins; Roy G Cantrell; David M Stelly; John Yu; Russell J Kohel; Mauricio Ulloa
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  Gene alterations at Drosophila inversion breakpoints provide prima facie evidence for natural selection as an explanation for rapid chromosomal evolution.

Authors:  Yolanda Guillén; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Testing chromosomal phylogenies and inversion breakpoint reuse in Drosophila. The martensis cluster revisited.

Authors:  Carlos F Prada; Alejandra Delprat; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  The transposon Galileo generates natural chromosomal inversions in Drosophila by ectopic recombination.

Authors:  Alejandra Delprat; Bàrbara Negre; Marta Puig; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A transgenomic cytogenetic sorghum (Sorghum propinquum) bacterial artificial chromosome fluorescence in situ hybridization map of maize (Zea mays L.) pachytene chromosome 9, evidence for regions of genome hyperexpansion.

Authors:  F Ina E Amarillo; Hank W Bass
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Concurrent Duplication of Drosophila Cid and Cenp-C Genes Resulted in Accelerated Evolution and Male Germline-Biased Expression of the New Copies.

Authors:  José R Teixeira; Guilherme B Dias; Marta Svartman; Alfredo Ruiz; Gustavo C S Kuhn
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  A BAC-based physical map of the Hessian fly genome anchored to polytene chromosomes.

Authors:  Rajat Aggarwal; Thiago R Benatti; Navdeep Gill; Chaoyang Zhao; Ming-Shun Chen; John P Fellers; Brandon J Schemerhorn; Jeff J Stuart
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.