Literature DB >> 22296923

Gene alterations at Drosophila inversion breakpoints provide prima facie evidence for natural selection as an explanation for rapid chromosomal evolution.

Yolanda Guillén1, Alfredo Ruiz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal inversions have been pervasive during the evolution of the genus Drosophila, but there is significant variation between lineages in the rate of rearrangement fixation. D. mojavensis, an ecological specialist adapted to a cactophilic niche under extreme desert conditions, is a chromosomally derived species with ten fixed inversions, five of them not present in any other species.
RESULTS: In order to explore the causes of the rapid chromosomal evolution in D. mojavensis, we identified and characterized all breakpoints of seven inversions fixed in chromosome 2, the most dynamic one. One of the inversions presents unequivocal evidence for its generation by ectopic recombination between transposon copies and another two harbor inverted duplications of non-repetitive DNA at the two breakpoints and were likely generated by staggered single-strand breaks and repair by non-homologous end joining. Four out of 14 breakpoints lay in the intergenic region between preexisting duplicated genes, suggesting an adaptive advantage of separating previously tightly linked duplicates. Four out of 14 breakpoints are associated with transposed genes, suggesting these breakpoints are fragile regions. Finally two inversions contain novel genes at their breakpoints and another three show alterations of genes at breakpoints with potential adaptive significance.
CONCLUSIONS: D. mojavensis chromosomal inversions were generated by multiple mechanisms, an observation that does not provide support for increased mutation rate as explanation for rapid chromosomal evolution. On the other hand, we have found a number of gene alterations at the breakpoints with putative adaptive consequences that directly point to natural selection as the cause of D. mojavensis rapid chromosomal evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22296923      PMCID: PMC3355041          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


  93 in total

1.  Generation of a widespread Drosophila inversion by a transposable element.

Authors:  M Cáceres; J M Ranz; A Barbadilla; M Long; A Ruiz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps.

Authors:  William J Murphy; Denis M Larkin; Annelie Everts-van der Wind; Guillaume Bourque; Glenn Tesler; Loretta Auvil; Jonathan E Beever; Bhanu P Chowdhary; Francis Galibert; Lisa Gatzke; Christophe Hitte; Stacey N Meyers; Denis Milan; Elaine A Ostrander; Greg Pape; Heidi G Parker; Terje Raudsepp; Margarita B Rogatcheva; Lawrence B Schook; Loren C Skow; Michael Welge; James E Womack; Stephen J O'brien; Pavel A Pevzner; Harris A Lewin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Response of two heat shock genes to selection for knockdown heat resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  G McColl; A A Hoffmann; S W McKechnie
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Allelic and ectopic recombination between Ty elements in yeast.

Authors:  M Kupiec; T D Petes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  J M Ranz; F Casals; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Testing chromosomal phylogenies and inversion breakpoint reuse in Drosophila.

Authors:  Josefa González; Ferran Casals; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Thermoprotection of synaptic transmission in a Drosophila heat shock factor mutant is accompanied by increased expression of Hsp83 and DnaJ-1.

Authors:  Scott J Neal; Shanker Karunanithi; Adrienne Best; Anthony Ken-Choy So; Robert M Tanguay; Harold L Atwood; J Timothy Westwood
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 3.107

8.  Revisiting the Impact of Inversions in Evolution: From Population Genetic Markers to Drivers of Adaptive Shifts and Speciation?

Authors:  Ary A Hoffmann; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 13.915

9.  Temporal patterns of fruit fly (Drosophila) evolution revealed by mutation clocks.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Sankar Subramanian; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  ReAS: Recovery of ancestral sequences for transposable elements from the unassembled reads of a whole genome shotgun.

Authors:  Ruiqiang Li; Jia Ye; Songgang Li; Jing Wang; Yujun Han; Chen Ye; Jian Wang; Huanming Yang; Jun Yu; Gane Ka-Shu Wong; Jun Wang
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  17 in total

1.  A molecular perspective on a complex polymorphic inversion system with cytological evidence of multiply reused breakpoints.

Authors:  D J Orengo; E Puerma; M Papaceit; C Segarra; M Aguadé
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 2.  How important are transposons for plant evolution?

Authors:  Damon Lisch
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Adaptation of Drosophila subobscura chromosomal inversions to climatic variables: the Balkan natural population of Avala.

Authors:  Goran Zivanovic; Concepció Arenas; Francesc Mestres
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Young inversion with multiple linked QTLs under selection in a hybrid zone.

Authors:  Cheng-Ruei Lee; Baosheng Wang; Julius P Mojica; Terezie Mandáková; Kasavajhala V S K Prasad; Jose Luis Goicoechea; Nadeesha Perera; Uffe Hellsten; Hope N Hundley; Jenifer Johnson; Jane Grimwood; Kerrie Barry; Stephen Fairclough; Jerry W Jenkins; Yeisoo Yu; Dave Kudrna; Jianwei Zhang; Jayson Talag; Wolfgang Golser; Kathryn Ghattas; M Eric Schranz; Rod Wing; Martin A Lysak; Jeremy Schmutz; Daniel S Rokhsar; Thomas Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 15.460

5.  Chromosomal evolution in the Drosophila cardini group (Diptera: Drosophilidae): photomaps and inversion analysis.

Authors:  Juliana Cordeiro; Daniela Cristina De Toni; Gisele de Souza da Silva; Vera Lucia da Silva Valente
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  The Atlantic salmon genome provides insights into rediploidization.

Authors:  Sigbjørn Lien; Ben F Koop; Simen R Sandve; Jason R Miller; Matthew P Kent; Torfinn Nome; Torgeir R Hvidsten; Jong S Leong; David R Minkley; Aleksey Zimin; Fabian Grammes; Harald Grove; Arne Gjuvsland; Brian Walenz; Russell A Hermansen; Kris von Schalburg; Eric B Rondeau; Alex Di Genova; Jeevan K A Samy; Jon Olav Vik; Magnus D Vigeland; Lis Caler; Unni Grimholt; Sissel Jentoft; Dag Inge Våge; Pieter de Jong; Thomas Moen; Matthew Baranski; Yniv Palti; Douglas R Smith; James A Yorke; Alexander J Nederbragt; Ave Tooming-Klunderud; Kjetill S Jakobsen; Xuanting Jiang; Dingding Fan; Yan Hu; David A Liberles; Rodrigo Vidal; Patricia Iturra; Steven J M Jones; Inge Jonassen; Alejandro Maass; Stig W Omholt; William S Davidson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Understanding the pathological manifestations of aromatase excess syndrome: lessons for clinical diagnosis.

Authors:  Makio Shozu; Maki Fukami; Tsutomu Ogata
Journal:  Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-07

8.  Genomics of ecological adaptation in cactophilic Drosophila.

Authors:  Yolanda Guillén; Núria Rius; Alejandra Delprat; Anna Williford; Francesc Muyas; Marta Puig; Sònia Casillas; Miquel Ràmia; Raquel Egea; Barbara Negre; Gisela Mir; Jordi Camps; Valentí Moncunill; Francisco J Ruiz-Ruano; Josefa Cabrero; Leonardo G de Lima; Guilherme B Dias; Jeronimo C Ruiz; Aurélie Kapusta; Jordi Garcia-Mas; Marta Gut; Ivo G Gut; David Torrents; Juan P Camacho; Gustavo C S Kuhn; Cédric Feschotte; Andrew G Clark; Esther Betrán; Antonio Barbadilla; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  The Sclerotinia sclerotiorum mating type locus (MAT) contains a 3.6-kb region that is inverted in every meiotic generation.

Authors:  Periasamy Chitrampalam; Patrik Inderbitzin; Karunakaran Maruthachalam; Bo-Ming Wu; Krishna V Subbarao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A divergent P element and its associated MITE, BuT5, generate chromosomal inversions and are widespread within the Drosophila repleta species group.

Authors:  Nuria Rius; Alejandra Delprat; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.