Yolanda Guillén1, Alfredo Ruiz. 1. Departament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chromosomal inversions have been pervasive during the evolution of the genus Drosophila, but there is significant variation between lineages in the rate of rearrangement fixation. D. mojavensis, an ecological specialist adapted to a cactophilic niche under extreme desert conditions, is a chromosomally derived species with ten fixed inversions, five of them not present in any other species. RESULTS: In order to explore the causes of the rapid chromosomal evolution in D. mojavensis, we identified and characterized all breakpoints of seven inversions fixed in chromosome 2, the most dynamic one. One of the inversions presents unequivocal evidence for its generation by ectopic recombination between transposon copies and another two harbor inverted duplications of non-repetitive DNA at the two breakpoints and were likely generated by staggered single-strand breaks and repair by non-homologous end joining. Four out of 14 breakpoints lay in the intergenic region between preexisting duplicated genes, suggesting an adaptive advantage of separating previously tightly linked duplicates. Four out of 14 breakpoints are associated with transposed genes, suggesting these breakpoints are fragile regions. Finally two inversions contain novel genes at their breakpoints and another three show alterations of genes at breakpoints with potential adaptive significance. CONCLUSIONS: D. mojavensis chromosomal inversions were generated by multiple mechanisms, an observation that does not provide support for increased mutation rate as explanation for rapid chromosomal evolution. On the other hand, we have found a number of gene alterations at the breakpoints with putative adaptive consequences that directly point to natural selection as the cause of D. mojavensis rapid chromosomal evolution.
BACKGROUND: Chromosomal inversions have been pervasive during the evolution of the genus Drosophila, but there is significant variation between lineages in the rate of rearrangement fixation. D. mojavensis, an ecological specialist adapted to a cactophilic niche under extreme desert conditions, is a chromosomally derived species with ten fixed inversions, five of them not present in any other species. RESULTS: In order to explore the causes of the rapid chromosomal evolution in D. mojavensis, we identified and characterized all breakpoints of seven inversions fixed in chromosome 2, the most dynamic one. One of the inversions presents unequivocal evidence for its generation by ectopic recombination between transposon copies and another two harbor inverted duplications of non-repetitive DNA at the two breakpoints and were likely generated by staggered single-strand breaks and repair by non-homologous end joining. Four out of 14 breakpoints lay in the intergenic region between preexisting duplicated genes, suggesting an adaptive advantage of separating previously tightly linked duplicates. Four out of 14 breakpoints are associated with transposed genes, suggesting these breakpoints are fragile regions. Finally two inversions contain novel genes at their breakpoints and another three show alterations of genes at breakpoints with potential adaptive significance. CONCLUSIONS:D. mojavensis chromosomal inversions were generated by multiple mechanisms, an observation that does not provide support for increased mutation rate as explanation for rapid chromosomal evolution. On the other hand, we have found a number of gene alterations at the breakpoints with putative adaptive consequences that directly point to natural selection as the cause of D. mojavensis rapid chromosomal evolution.
Authors: William J Murphy; Denis M Larkin; Annelie Everts-van der Wind; Guillaume Bourque; Glenn Tesler; Loretta Auvil; Jonathan E Beever; Bhanu P Chowdhary; Francis Galibert; Lisa Gatzke; Christophe Hitte; Stacey N Meyers; Denis Milan; Elaine A Ostrander; Greg Pape; Heidi G Parker; Terje Raudsepp; Margarita B Rogatcheva; Lawrence B Schook; Loren C Skow; Michael Welge; James E Womack; Stephen J O'brien; Pavel A Pevzner; Harris A Lewin Journal: Science Date: 2005-07-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Scott J Neal; Shanker Karunanithi; Adrienne Best; Anthony Ken-Choy So; Robert M Tanguay; Harold L Atwood; J Timothy Westwood Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2006-04-04 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Cheng-Ruei Lee; Baosheng Wang; Julius P Mojica; Terezie Mandáková; Kasavajhala V S K Prasad; Jose Luis Goicoechea; Nadeesha Perera; Uffe Hellsten; Hope N Hundley; Jenifer Johnson; Jane Grimwood; Kerrie Barry; Stephen Fairclough; Jerry W Jenkins; Yeisoo Yu; Dave Kudrna; Jianwei Zhang; Jayson Talag; Wolfgang Golser; Kathryn Ghattas; M Eric Schranz; Rod Wing; Martin A Lysak; Jeremy Schmutz; Daniel S Rokhsar; Thomas Mitchell-Olds Journal: Nat Ecol Evol Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 15.460
Authors: Juliana Cordeiro; Daniela Cristina De Toni; Gisele de Souza da Silva; Vera Lucia da Silva Valente Journal: Genetica Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 1.082
Authors: Sigbjørn Lien; Ben F Koop; Simen R Sandve; Jason R Miller; Matthew P Kent; Torfinn Nome; Torgeir R Hvidsten; Jong S Leong; David R Minkley; Aleksey Zimin; Fabian Grammes; Harald Grove; Arne Gjuvsland; Brian Walenz; Russell A Hermansen; Kris von Schalburg; Eric B Rondeau; Alex Di Genova; Jeevan K A Samy; Jon Olav Vik; Magnus D Vigeland; Lis Caler; Unni Grimholt; Sissel Jentoft; Dag Inge Våge; Pieter de Jong; Thomas Moen; Matthew Baranski; Yniv Palti; Douglas R Smith; James A Yorke; Alexander J Nederbragt; Ave Tooming-Klunderud; Kjetill S Jakobsen; Xuanting Jiang; Dingding Fan; Yan Hu; David A Liberles; Rodrigo Vidal; Patricia Iturra; Steven J M Jones; Inge Jonassen; Alejandro Maass; Stig W Omholt; William S Davidson Journal: Nature Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Yolanda Guillén; Núria Rius; Alejandra Delprat; Anna Williford; Francesc Muyas; Marta Puig; Sònia Casillas; Miquel Ràmia; Raquel Egea; Barbara Negre; Gisela Mir; Jordi Camps; Valentí Moncunill; Francisco J Ruiz-Ruano; Josefa Cabrero; Leonardo G de Lima; Guilherme B Dias; Jeronimo C Ruiz; Aurélie Kapusta; Jordi Garcia-Mas; Marta Gut; Ivo G Gut; David Torrents; Juan P Camacho; Gustavo C S Kuhn; Cédric Feschotte; Andrew G Clark; Esther Betrán; Antonio Barbadilla; Alfredo Ruiz Journal: Genome Biol Evol Date: 2014-12-31 Impact factor: 3.416