Literature DB >> 11157786

How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila.

J M Ranz1, F Casals, A Ruiz.   

Abstract

During the evolution of the genus Drosophila, the molecular organization of the major chromosomal elements has been repeatedly rearranged via the fixation of paracentric inversions. Little detailed information is available, however, on the extent and effect of these changes at the molecular level. In principle, a full description of the rate and pattern of change could reveal the limits, if any, to which the eukaryotic genome can accommodate reorganizations. We have constructed a high-density physical map of the largest chromosomal element in Drosophila repleta (chromosome 2) and compared the order and distances between the markers with those on the homologous chromosomal element (3R) in Drosophila melanogaster. The two species belong to different subgenera (Drosophila and Sophophora, respectively), which diverged 40-62 million years (Myr) ago and represent, thus, the farthest lineages within the Drosophila genus. The comparison reveals extensive reshuffling of gene order from centromere to telomere. Using a maximum likelihood method, we estimate that 114 +/- 14 paracentric inversions have been fixed in this chromosomal element since the divergence of the two species, that is, 0.9-1.4 inversions fixed per Myr. Comparison with available rates of chromosomal evolution, taking into account genome size, indicates that the Drosophila genome shows the highest rate found so far in any eukaryote. Twenty-one small segments (23-599 kb) comprising at least two independent (nonoverlapping) markers appear to be conserved between D. melanogaster and D. repleta. These results are consistent with the random breakage model and do not provide significant evidence of functional constraint of any kind. They support the notion that the Drosophila genome is extraordinarily malleable and has a modular organization. The high rate of chromosomal change also suggests a very limited transferability of the positional information from the Drosophila genome to other insects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11157786      PMCID: PMC311025          DOI: 10.1101/gr.162901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  58 in total

1.  Genome mapping in capsicum and the evolution of genome structure in the solanaceae.

Authors:  K D Livingstone; V K Lackney; J R Blauth; R van Wijk; M K Jahn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Generation of a widespread Drosophila inversion by a transposable element.

Authors:  M Cáceres; J M Ranz; A Barbadilla; M Long; A Ruiz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  DNA sequence evidence for the segmental allotetraploid origin of maize.

Authors:  B S Gaut; J F Doebley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Molecular organization of the Drosophila melanogaster Adh chromosomal region in D. repleta and D. buzzatii, two distantly related species of the Drosophila subgenus.

Authors:  J González; E Betrán; M Ashburner; A Ruiz
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Construction and characterization of bacterial artificial chromosome libraries from the silkworm, Bombyx mori.

Authors:  C Wu; S Asakawa; N Shimizu; S Kawasaki; Y Yasukochi
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1999-06

6.  Comparative mapping of cosmids and gene clones from a 1.6 Mb chromosomal region of Drosophila melanogaster in three species of the distantly related subgenus Drosophila.

Authors:  J M Ranz; M Cáceres; A Ruiz
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 7.  Comparative genome mapping in the sequence-based era: early experience with human chromosome 7.

Authors:  J W Thomas; T J Summers; S Q Lee-Lin; V V Maduro; J R Idol; S D Mastrian; J F Ryan; D C Jamison; E D Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 8.  The promise of comparative genomics in mammals.

Authors:  S J O'Brien; M Menotti-Raymond; W J Murphy; W G Nash; J Wienberg; R Stanyon; N G Copeland; N A Jenkins; J E Womack; J A Marshall Graves
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  stress sensitive B encodes an adenine nucleotide translocase in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Y Q Zhang; J Roote; S Brogna; A W Davis; D A Barbash; D Nash; M Ashburner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M D Adams; S E Celniker; R A Holt; C A Evans; J D Gocayne; P G Amanatides; S E Scherer; P W Li; R A Hoskins; R F Galle; R A George; S E Lewis; S Richards; M Ashburner; S N Henderson; G G Sutton; J R Wortman; M D Yandell; Q Zhang; L X Chen; R C Brandon; Y H Rogers; R G Blazej; M Champe; B D Pfeiffer; K H Wan; C Doyle; E G Baxter; G Helt; C R Nelson; G L Gabor; J F Abril; A Agbayani; H J An; C Andrews-Pfannkoch; D Baldwin; R M Ballew; A Basu; J Baxendale; L Bayraktaroglu; E M Beasley; K Y Beeson; P V Benos; B P Berman; D Bhandari; S Bolshakov; D Borkova; M R Botchan; J Bouck; P Brokstein; P Brottier; K C Burtis; D A Busam; H Butler; E Cadieu; A Center; I Chandra; J M Cherry; S Cawley; C Dahlke; L B Davenport; P Davies; B de Pablos; A Delcher; Z Deng; A D Mays; I Dew; S M Dietz; K Dodson; L E Doup; M Downes; S Dugan-Rocha; B C Dunkov; P Dunn; K J Durbin; C C Evangelista; C Ferraz; S Ferriera; W Fleischmann; C Fosler; A E Gabrielian; N S Garg; W M Gelbart; K Glasser; A Glodek; F Gong; J H Gorrell; Z Gu; P Guan; M Harris; N L Harris; D Harvey; T J Heiman; J R Hernandez; J Houck; D Hostin; K A Houston; T J Howland; M H Wei; C Ibegwam; M Jalali; F Kalush; G H Karpen; Z Ke; J A Kennison; K A Ketchum; B E Kimmel; C D Kodira; C Kraft; S Kravitz; D Kulp; Z Lai; P Lasko; Y Lei; A A Levitsky; J Li; Z Li; Y Liang; X Lin; X Liu; B Mattei; T C McIntosh; M P McLeod; D McPherson; G Merkulov; N V Milshina; C Mobarry; J Morris; A Moshrefi; S M Mount; M Moy; B Murphy; L Murphy; D M Muzny; D L Nelson; D R Nelson; K A Nelson; K Nixon; D R Nusskern; J M Pacleb; M Palazzolo; G S Pittman; S Pan; J Pollard; V Puri; M G Reese; K Reinert; K Remington; R D Saunders; F Scheeler; H Shen; B C Shue; I Sidén-Kiamos; M Simpson; M P Skupski; T Smith; E Spier; A C Spradling; M Stapleton; R Strong; E Sun; R Svirskas; C Tector; R Turner; E Venter; A H Wang; X Wang; Z Y Wang; D A Wassarman; G M Weinstock; J Weissenbach; S M Williams; K C Worley; D Wu; S Yang; Q A Yao; J Ye; R F Yeh; J S Zaveri; M Zhan; G Zhang; Q Zhao; L Zheng; X H Zheng; F N Zhong; W Zhong; X Zhou; S Zhu; X Zhu; H O Smith; R A Gibbs; E W Myers; G M Rubin; J C Venter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  75 in total

Review 1.  Through a genome, darkly: comparative analysis of plant chromosomal DNA.

Authors:  Graham J King
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  A question of size: the eukaryotic proteome and the problems in defining it.

Authors:  Paul M Harrison; Anuj Kumar; Ning Lang; Michael Snyder; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Hox cluster duplications and the opportunity for evolutionary novelties.

Authors:  Gunte P Wagner; Chris Amemiya; Frank Ruddle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Bayesian estimation of genomic distance.

Authors:  Richard Durrett; Rasmus Nielsen; Thomas L York
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Fragile regions and not functional constraints predominate in shaping gene organization in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  Marcin von Grotthuss; Michael Ashburner; José M Ranz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Genomic rearrangements and the evolution of clusters of locally adaptive loci.

Authors:  Sam Yeaman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Physical and Linkage Maps for Drosophila serrata, a Model Species for Studies of Clinal Adaptation and Sexual Selection.

Authors:  Ann J Stocker; Bosco B Rusuwa; Mark J Blacket; Francesca D Frentiu; Mitchell Sullivan; Bradley R Foley; Scott Beatson; Ary A Hoffmann; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Evolutionary rate analyses of orthologs and paralogs from 12 Drosophila genomes.

Authors:  Andreas Heger; Chris P Ponting
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 9.  Aging genomes: a necessary evil in the logic of life.

Authors:  Jan Vijg
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 4.345

10.  Strong evidence for lineage and sequence specificity of substitution rates and patterns in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Peter F Arndt; Andrew G Clark; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.