Literature DB >> 21394512

Testing chromosomal phylogenies and inversion breakpoint reuse in Drosophila. The martensis cluster revisited.

Carlos F Prada1, Alejandra Delprat, Alfredo Ruiz.   

Abstract

The chromosomal relationships of the four martensis cluster species are among the most complex and intricate within the entire Drosophila repleta group, due to the so-called sharing of inversions. Here, we have revised these relationships using comparative mapping of bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones on the salivary gland chromosomes. A physical map of chromosome 2 of Drosophila uniseta (one of the cluster members) was generated by in situ hybridization of 82 BAC clones from the physical map of the Drosophila buzzatii genome (an outgroup that represents the ancestral arrangement). By comparing the marker positions, we determined the number, order, and orientation of conserved chromosomal segments between chromosome 2 of D. buzzatii and D. uniseta. GRIMM software was used to infer that a minimum of five chromosomal inversions are necessary to transform the chromosome 2 of D. buzzatii into that of D. uniseta. Two of these inversions have been overlooked in previous cytological analyses. The five fixed inversions entail two breakpoint reuses because only nine syntenic segments and eight interruptions were observed. We tested for the presence of the five inversions fixed in D. uniseta in the other three species of the martensis cluster by in situ hybridization of eight breakpoint-bearing BAC clones. The results shed light on the chromosomal phylogeny of the martensis cluster, yet leave a number of questions open.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21394512     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-011-9195-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  59 in total

1.  The relationship between allozyme and chromosomal polymorphism inferred from nucleotide variation at the Acph-1 gene region of Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  A Navarro-Sabaté; M Aguadé; C Segarra
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Generation of a widespread Drosophila inversion by a transposable element.

Authors:  M Cáceres; J M Ranz; A Barbadilla; M Long; A Ruiz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Molecular evolution and phylogeny of the buzzatii complex (Drosophila repleta group): a maximum-likelihood approach.

Authors:  F Rodríguez-Trelles; L Alarcón; A Fontdevila
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps.

Authors:  William J Murphy; Denis M Larkin; Annelie Everts-van der Wind; Guillaume Bourque; Glenn Tesler; Loretta Auvil; Jonathan E Beever; Bhanu P Chowdhary; Francis Galibert; Lisa Gatzke; Christophe Hitte; Stacey N Meyers; Denis Milan; Elaine A Ostrander; Greg Pape; Heidi G Parker; Terje Raudsepp; Margarita B Rogatcheva; Lawrence B Schook; Loren C Skow; Michael Welge; James E Womack; Stephen J O'brien; Pavel A Pevzner; Harris A Lewin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  J M Ranz; F Casals; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Testing chromosomal phylogenies and inversion breakpoint reuse in Drosophila.

Authors:  Josefa González; Ferran Casals; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Evolutionary cytogenetics of the Drosophila buzzatii species complex.

Authors:  A Ruiz; M Wasserman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Temporal patterns of fruit fly (Drosophila) evolution revealed by mutation clocks.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Sankar Subramanian; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  The population genomics of trans-specific inversion polymorphisms in Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Bradley J White; Changde Cheng; Djibril Sangaré; Neil F Lobo; Frank H Collins; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  High-resolution comparative mapping among man, cattle and mouse suggests a role for repeat sequences in mammalian genome evolution.

Authors:  Laurent Schibler; Anne Roig; Marie-Françoise Mahe; Pascal Laurent; Hélène Hayes; François Rodolphe; Edmond P Cribiu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  Gene alterations at Drosophila inversion breakpoints provide prima facie evidence for natural selection as an explanation for rapid chromosomal evolution.

Authors:  Yolanda Guillén; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  Chromosomal evolution in the Drosophila cardini group (Diptera: Drosophilidae): photomaps and inversion analysis.

Authors:  Juliana Cordeiro; Daniela Cristina De Toni; Gisele de Souza da Silva; Vera Lucia da Silva Valente
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 1.082

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.