Literature DB >> 12136017

Chromosomal elements evolve at different rates in the Drosophila genome.

Josefa González1, José María Ranz, Alfredo Ruiz.   

Abstract

Recent results indicate that the rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila is the highest found so far in any eukaryote. This conclusion is based chiefly on the comparative mapping analysis of a single chromosomal element (Muller's element E) in two species, D. melanogaster and D. repleta, representing the two farthest lineages within the genus (the Sophophora and Drosophila subgenera, respectively). We have extended the analysis to two other chromosomal elements (Muller's elements A and D) and tested for differences in rate of evolution among chromosomes. With this purpose, detailed physical maps of chromosomes X and 4 of D. repleta were constructed by in situ hybridization of 145 DNA probes (gene clones, cosmids, and P1 phages) and their gene arrangements compared with those of the homologous chromosomes X and 3L of D. melanogaster. Both chromosomal elements have been extensively reshuffled over their entire length. The number of paracentric inversions fixed has been estimated as 118 +/- 17 for element A and 56 +/- 8 for element D. Comparison with previous data for elements E and B shows that there are fourfold differences in evolution rate among chromosomal elements, with chromosome X exhibiting the highest rate of rearrangement. Combining all results, we estimated that 393 paracentric inversions have been fixed in the whole genome since the divergence between D. repleta and D. melanogaster. This amounts to an average rate of 0.053 disruptions/Mb/myr, corroborating the high rate of rearrangement in the genus Drosophila.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12136017      PMCID: PMC1462194     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  87 in total

1.  An abundance of X-linked genes expressed in spermatogonia.

Authors:  P J Wang; J R McCarrey; F Yang; D C Page
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Generation of a widespread Drosophila inversion by a transposable element.

Authors:  M Cáceres; J M Ranz; A Barbadilla; M Long; A Ruiz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  corkscrew encodes a putative protein tyrosine phosphatase that functions to transduce the terminal signal from the receptor tyrosine kinase torso.

Authors:  L A Perkins; I Larsen; N Perrimon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-07-24       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Plant comparative genetics after 10 years.

Authors:  M D Gale; K M Devos
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  J M Ranz; F Casals; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 6.  Trinucleotide repeats associated with human disease.

Authors:  M Mitas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Location of the LSP-1 Genes in Drosophila Species by IN SITU Hybridization.

Authors:  H W Brock; D B Roberts
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Evolutionary cytogenetics of the Drosophila buzzatii species complex.

Authors:  A Ruiz; M Wasserman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Four heat shock proteins of Drosophila melanogaster coded within a 12-kilobase region in chromosome subdivision 67B.

Authors:  V Corces; R Holmgren; R Freund; R Morimoto; M Meselson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Synteny conservation and chromosome rearrangements during mammalian evolution.

Authors:  J Ehrlich; D Sankoff; J H Nadeau
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  25 in total

1.  Hierarchical scaffolding with Bambus.

Authors:  Mihai Pop; Daniel S Kosack; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  A physical map for an Asian malaria mosquito, Anopheles stephensi.

Authors:  Maria V Sharakhova; Ai Xia; Zhijian Tu; Yogesh S Shouche; Maria F Unger; Igor V Sharakhov
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  A genomic comparison of faster-sex, faster-X, and faster-male evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Heidi Musters; Melanie A Huntley; Rama S Singh
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Dense gene physical maps of the non-model species Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  Dorcas J Orengo; Eva Puerma; Montserrat Papaceit; Carmen Segarra; Montserrat Aguadé
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Testing chromosomal phylogenies and inversion breakpoint reuse in Drosophila.

Authors:  Josefa González; Ferran Casals; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Conservation of regulatory sequences and gene expression patterns in the disintegrating Drosophila Hox gene complex.

Authors:  Bárbara Negre; Sònia Casillas; Magali Suzanne; Ernesto Sánchez-Herrero; Michael Akam; Michael Nefedov; Antonio Barbadilla; Pieter de Jong; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Genome landscape and evolutionary plasticity of chromosomes in malaria mosquitoes.

Authors:  Ai Xia; Maria V Sharakhova; Scotland C Leman; Zhijian Tu; Jeffrey A Bailey; Christopher D Smith; Igor V Sharakhov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Duplicative and conservative transpositions of larval serum protein 1 genes in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  Josefa González; Ferran Casals; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Chromosomal rearrangement inferred from comparisons of 12 Drosophila genomes.

Authors:  Arjun Bhutkar; Stephen W Schaeffer; Susan M Russo; Mu Xu; Temple F Smith; William M Gelbart
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Rates and patterns of chromosomal evolution in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. miranda.

Authors:  Carolina Bartolomé; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.