Literature DB >> 17028333

Testing chromosomal phylogenies and inversion breakpoint reuse in Drosophila.

Josefa González1, Ferran Casals, Alfredo Ruiz.   

Abstract

A combination of cytogenetic and bioinformatic procedures was used to test the chromosomal phylogeny relating Drosophila buzzatii with D. repleta. Chromosomes X and 2, harboring most of the inversions fixed between these two species, were analyzed. First, chromosomal segments conserved during the divergence of the two species were identified by comparative in situ hybridization to the D. repleta chromosomes of 180 BAC clones from a BAC-based physical map of the D. buzzatii genome. These conserved segments were precisely delimited with the aid of clones containing inversion breakpoints. Then GRIMM software was used to estimate the minimum number of rearrangements necessary to transform one genome into the other and identify all possible rearrangement scenarios. Finally, the most plausible inversion trajectory was tested by hybridizing 12 breakpoint-bearing BAC clones to the chromosomes of seven other species in the repleta group. The results show that chromosomes X and 2 of D. buzzatii and D. repleta differ by 12 paracentric inversions. Nine of them are fixed in chromosome 2 and entail two breakpoint reuses. Our results also show that the cytological relationship between D. repleta and D. mercatorum is closer than that between D. repleta and D. peninsularis, and we propose that the phylogenetic relationships in this lineage of the repleta group be reconsidered. We also estimated the rate of rearrangement between D. repleta and D. buzzatii and conclude that rates within the genus Drosophila vary substantially between lineages, even within a single species group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17028333      PMCID: PMC1775012          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.062612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  61 in total

1.  Generation of a widespread Drosophila inversion by a transposable element.

Authors:  M Cáceres; J M Ranz; A Barbadilla; M Long; A Ruiz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Unusual haplotype structure at the proximal breakpoint of In(2L)t in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P Andolfatto; J D Wall; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome.

Authors:  E S Lander; L M Linton; B Birren; C Nusbaum; M C Zody; J Baldwin; K Devon; K Dewar; M Doyle; W FitzHugh; R Funke; D Gage; K Harris; A Heaford; J Howland; L Kann; J Lehoczky; R LeVine; P McEwan; K McKernan; J Meldrim; J P Mesirov; C Miranda; W Morris; J Naylor; C Raymond; M Rosetti; R Santos; A Sheridan; C Sougnez; Y Stange-Thomann; N Stojanovic; A Subramanian; D Wyman; J Rogers; J Sulston; R Ainscough; S Beck; D Bentley; J Burton; C Clee; N Carter; A Coulson; R Deadman; P Deloukas; A Dunham; I Dunham; R Durbin; L French; D Grafham; S Gregory; T Hubbard; S Humphray; A Hunt; M Jones; C Lloyd; A McMurray; L Matthews; S Mercer; S Milne; J C Mullikin; A Mungall; R Plumb; M Ross; R Shownkeen; S Sims; R H Waterston; R K Wilson; L W Hillier; J D McPherson; M A Marra; E R Mardis; L A Fulton; A T Chinwalla; K H Pepin; W R Gish; S L Chissoe; M C Wendl; K D Delehaunty; T L Miner; A Delehaunty; J B Kramer; L L Cook; R S Fulton; D L Johnson; P J Minx; S W Clifton; T Hawkins; E Branscomb; P Predki; P Richardson; S Wenning; T Slezak; N Doggett; J F Cheng; A Olsen; S Lucas; C Elkin; E Uberbacher; M Frazier; R A Gibbs; D M Muzny; S E Scherer; J B Bouck; E J Sodergren; K C Worley; C M Rives; J H Gorrell; M L Metzker; S L Naylor; R S Kucherlapati; D L Nelson; G M Weinstock; Y Sakaki; A Fujiyama; M Hattori; T Yada; A Toyoda; T Itoh; C Kawagoe; H Watanabe; Y Totoki; T Taylor; J Weissenbach; R Heilig; W Saurin; F Artiguenave; P Brottier; T Bruls; E Pelletier; C Robert; P Wincker; D R Smith; L Doucette-Stamm; M Rubenfield; K Weinstock; H M Lee; J Dubois; A Rosenthal; M Platzer; G Nyakatura; S Taudien; A Rump; H Yang; J Yu; J Wang; G Huang; J Gu; L Hood; L Rowen; A Madan; S Qin; R W Davis; N A Federspiel; A P Abola; M J Proctor; R M Myers; J Schmutz; M Dickson; J Grimwood; D R Cox; M V Olson; R Kaul; C Raymond; N Shimizu; K Kawasaki; S Minoshima; G A Evans; M Athanasiou; R Schultz; B A Roe; F Chen; H Pan; J Ramser; H Lehrach; R Reinhardt; W R McCombie; M de la Bastide; N Dedhia; H Blöcker; K Hornischer; G Nordsiek; R Agarwala; L Aravind; J A Bailey; A Bateman; S Batzoglou; E Birney; P Bork; D G Brown; C B Burge; L Cerutti; H C Chen; D Church; M Clamp; R R Copley; T Doerks; S R Eddy; E E Eichler; T S Furey; J Galagan; J G Gilbert; C Harmon; Y Hayashizaki; D Haussler; H Hermjakob; K Hokamp; W Jang; L S Johnson; T A Jones; S Kasif; A Kaspryzk; S Kennedy; W J Kent; P Kitts; E V Koonin; I Korf; D Kulp; D Lancet; T M Lowe; A McLysaght; T Mikkelsen; J V Moran; N Mulder; V J Pollara; C P Ponting; G Schuler; J Schultz; G Slater; A F Smit; E Stupka; J Szustakowki; D Thierry-Mieg; J Thierry-Mieg; L Wagner; J Wallis; R Wheeler; A Williams; Y I Wolf; K H Wolfe; S P Yang; R F Yeh; F Collins; M S Guyer; J Peterson; A Felsenfeld; K A Wetterstrand; A Patrinos; M J Morgan; P de Jong; J J Catanese; K Osoegawa; H Shizuya; S Choi; Y J Chen; J Szustakowki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  It takes two transposons to tango: transposable-element-mediated chromosomal rearrangements.

Authors:  Y H Gray
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 5.  Molecular mechanisms for constitutional chromosomal rearrangements in humans.

Authors:  L G Shaffer; J R Lupski
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 16.830

6.  How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  J M Ranz; F Casals; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Comparative mapping of cosmids and gene clones from a 1.6 Mb chromosomal region of Drosophila melanogaster in three species of the distantly related subgenus Drosophila.

Authors:  J M Ranz; M Cáceres; A Ruiz
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Molecular characterization of two natural hotspots in the Drosophila buzzatii genome induced by transposon insertions.

Authors:  M Cáceres; M Puig; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Phylogenetic analysis of the repleta species group of the genus Drosophila using multiple sources of characters.

Authors:  C M Durando; R H Baker; W J Etges; W B Heed; M Wasserman; R DeSalle
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.286

10.  Polytene chromosomes as indicators of phylogeny in several species groups of Drosophila.

Authors:  P M O'Grady; R H Baker; C M Durando; W J Etges; R DeSalle
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2001-10-10       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  17 in total

1.  Gene alterations at Drosophila inversion breakpoints provide prima facie evidence for natural selection as an explanation for rapid chromosomal evolution.

Authors:  Yolanda Guillén; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  Testing chromosomal phylogenies and inversion breakpoint reuse in Drosophila. The martensis cluster revisited.

Authors:  Carlos F Prada; Alejandra Delprat; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Segmental duplication, microinversion, and gene loss associated with a complex inversion breakpoint region in Drosophila.

Authors:  Oriol Calvete; Josefa González; Esther Betrán; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  The relevance of chromatin architecture to genome rearrangements in Drosophila.

Authors:  Dynisty Wright; Stephen W Schaeffer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.671

5.  Chromosomal rearrangement inferred from comparisons of 12 Drosophila genomes.

Authors:  Arjun Bhutkar; Stephen W Schaeffer; Susan M Russo; Mu Xu; Temple F Smith; William M Gelbart
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Characterization of the shsp genes in Drosophila buzzatii and association between the frequency of Valine mutations in hsp23 and climatic variables along a longitudinal gradient in Australia.

Authors:  Jane Frydenberg; J Stuart F Barker; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 3.667

7.  Chromosomal evolution in the Drosophila cardini group (Diptera: Drosophilidae): photomaps and inversion analysis.

Authors:  Juliana Cordeiro; Daniela Cristina De Toni; Gisele de Souza da Silva; Vera Lucia da Silva Valente
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  A new chromosomal phylogeny supports the repeated origin of vectorial capacity in malaria mosquitoes of the Anopheles gambiae complex.

Authors:  Maryam Kamali; Ai Xia; Zhijian Tu; Igor V Sharakhov
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  Arm-specific dynamics of chromosome evolution in malaria mosquitoes.

Authors:  Maria V Sharakhova; Ai Xia; Scotland C Leman; Igor V Sharakhov
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Chromosomal plasticity and evolutionary potential in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto: insights from three decades of rare paracentric inversions.

Authors:  Marco Pombi; Beniamino Caputo; Frederic Simard; Maria A Di Deco; Mario Coluzzi; Alessandra della Torre; Carlo Costantini; Nora J Besansky; Vincenzo Petrarca
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.