Literature DB >> 17091288

External postural perturbations induce multiple anticipatory postural adjustments when subjects cannot pre-select their stepping foot.

Jesse V Jacobs1, Fay B Horak.   

Abstract

Previous research on human balance recovery suggests that, prior to an externally triggered postural perturbation, healthy subjects can pre-select their postural response based on the environmental context, but it is unclear whether this pre-selection includes the selection of a stepping leg when performing compensatory steps. We sought to determine how pre-selecting a stepping limb affects the compensatory steps and stability of young, healthy subjects when responding to postural perturbations. Nine healthy subjects (24-37 years of age) stepped in response to backward translations of a platform under their feet when, prior to the perturbations, the subjects either knew whether they were to step with their left or right leg to a visual target (the Predictable condition) or did not know whether to step with their left or right leg until one of two targets appeared at perturbation onset (the Unpredictable condition). The Unpredictable condition also included randomly inserted trials of toes-up rotations and backward translations without targets (catch trials). The results showed that, in the Predictable condition, the subjects consistently exhibited one anticipatory postural adjustment (APA; a lateral weight shift toward the stance limb) before stepping accurately to the target with the correct leg. In the Unpredictable condition, the subjects either (1) exhibited multiple APAs, late step onsets, and forward center-of-mass (CoM) displacements that were farther beyond their base of support, or (2) exhibited an early step with only one APA and kept their CoM closer to the base of support, but also stepped more often with the incorrect leg. Thus, when the subjects had to select a stepping leg at perturbation onset, they either became more unstable and used multiple APAs to delay stepping in order to provide enough time to select the correct stepping leg, or they stepped earlier to remain stable but often stepped with the incorrect leg. In addition, responses to catch trials in the Unpredictable condition included distorted step placements that resembled steps to anticipated targets, despite allowing the subjects to step with a leg of their choice and to a location of their choice. Lastly, the subjects' voluntary stepping latencies to visual targets presented without perturbations were twice as long as their stepping latencies to the backward platform translations. Therefore, healthy subjects appear to pre-select their stepping limb, even when the perturbation characteristics are unpredictable, because relying on visual input provided at perturbation onset requires a delayed response that leads to greater instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17091288     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0763-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Environmental constraints on foot trajectory reveal the capacity for modulation of anticipatory postural adjustments during rapid triggered stepping reactions.

Authors:  John L Zettel; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Can stabilizing features of rapid triggered stepping reactions be modulated to meet environmental constraints?

Authors:  John L Zettel; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Resolving conflicts in task demands during balance recovery: does holding an object inhibit compensatory grasping?

Authors:  Hamid Bateni; Aleksandra Zecevic; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Initiation of rapid reach-and-grasp balance reactions: is a pre-formed visuospatial map used in controlling the initial arm trajectory?

Authors:  Mohammad Ghafouri; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Direction-specific postural instability in subjects with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Fay B Horak; Diana Dimitrova; John G Nutt
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.330

6.  Redirection of gaze and switching of attention during rapid stepping reactions evoked by unpredictable postural perturbation.

Authors:  John L Zettel; Andrea Holbeche; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Parkinson's disease impairs the ability to change set quickly.

Authors:  R K Chong; F B Horak; M H Woollacott
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 3.181

8.  Triggering of protective stepping for the control of human balance: age and contextual dependence.

Authors:  Mark W Rogers; Lois D Hedman; Marjorie E Johnson; Kathy M Martinez; Marie-Laure Mille
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-04

9.  Postural inflexibility in parkinsonian subjects.

Authors:  F B Horak; J G Nutt; L M Nashner
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.181

10.  Abnormal force patterns for multidirectional postural responses in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Diana Dimitrova; John Nutt; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  33 in total

1.  Cortical activity differs between position- and force-control knee extension tasks.

Authors:  Peter C Poortvliet; Kylie J Tucker; Simon Finnigan; Dion Scott; Paul Sowman; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Cortical control of postural responses.

Authors:  J V Jacobs; F B Horak
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Changes in the activity of the cerebral cortex relate to postural response modification when warned of a perturbation.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Katsuo Fujiwara; Hidehito Tomita; Naoe Furune; Kenji Kunita; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Errors in postural preparation lead to increased choice reaction times for step initiation in older adults.

Authors:  Rajal G Cohen; John G Nutt; Fay B Horak
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 5.  Online adjustments of leg movements in healthy young and old.

Authors:  Zrinka Potocanac; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Postural adjustment errors reveal deficits in inhibition during lateral step initiation in older adults.

Authors:  Patrick J Sparto; Susan I Fuhrman; Mark S Redfern; J Richard Jennings; Subashan Perera; Robert D Nebes; Joseph M Furman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Postural adjustment errors during lateral step initiation in older and younger adults.

Authors:  Patrick J Sparto; Susan I Fuhrman; Mark S Redfern; Subashan Perera; J Richard Jennings; Alia A Alghwiri; Joseph M Furman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  EEG measures reveal dual-task interference in postural performance in young adults.

Authors:  C Elaine Little; Marjorie Woollacott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Lateral stepping for postural correction in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Laurie A King; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 10.  Delaying mobility disability in people with Parkinson disease using a sensorimotor agility exercise program.

Authors:  Laurie A King; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-02-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.