Literature DB >> 17557125

Cognitive demands and cortical control of human balance-recovery reactions.

B E Maki1, W E McIlroy.   

Abstract

A traditional view has been that balance control occurs at a very automatic level, primarily involving the spinal cord and brainstem; however, there is growing evidence that the cerebral cortex and cognitive processing are involved in controlling specific aspects of balance. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent literature pertaining to the cognitive demands and cortical control of balance-recovery reactions, focussing on five emerging sources of evidence: 1) dual-task studies demonstrating that concurrent performance of cognitive and balance-recovery tasks leads to interference effects; 2) dual-task studies that have examined the temporal dynamics associated with the reallocation of cognitive resources to the balance-recovery task; 3) visual attention studies that have inferred contributions of visual attention based on gaze measurements and/or manipulations to occlude vision; 4) measurements of brain potentials evoked by postural perturbation; and 5) use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to alter contributions from specific cortical areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17557125     DOI: 10.1007/s00702-007-0764-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)        ISSN: 0300-9564            Impact factor:   3.575


  51 in total

1.  Temporal properties of attention sharing consequent to disturbed balance.

Authors:  W E McIlroy; R G Norrie; J D Brooke; D C Bishop; A J Nelson; B E Maki
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-09-29       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Attentional demands and postural recovery: the effects of aging.

Authors:  L A Brown; A Shumway-Cook; M H Woollacott
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Effect of articulatory and mental tasks on postural control.

Authors:  L Yardley; M Gardner; A Leadbetter; N Lavie
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-02-05       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Can stabilizing features of rapid triggered stepping reactions be modulated to meet environmental constraints?

Authors:  John L Zettel; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Introduction to Laplacian montages.

Authors:  Ronald Gordon; Edward J Rzempoluck
Journal:  Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol       Date:  2004-06

6.  Cortical activation following a balance disturbance.

Authors:  S Quant; A L Adkin; W R Staines; W E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Redirection of gaze and switching of attention during rapid stepping reactions evoked by unpredictable postural perturbation.

Authors:  John L Zettel; Andrea Holbeche; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  The role of limb movements in maintaining upright stance: the "change-in-support" strategy.

Authors:  B E Maki; W E McIlroy
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1997-05

9.  Cerebral evoked potentials associated with the compensatory reactions following stance and gait perturbation.

Authors:  V Dietz; J Quintern; W Berger
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1984-09-07       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Mechanically evoked cerebral potentials to sudden ankle dorsiflexion in human subjects during standing.

Authors:  B Dimitrov; T Gavrilenko; P Gatev
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1996-04-26       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  59 in total

1.  The use of peripheral vision to guide perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  Emily C King; Sandra M McKay; Kenneth C Cheng; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Where do we look when we walk on stairs? Gaze behaviour on stairs, transitions, and handrails.

Authors:  Veronica Miyasike-daSilva; Fran Allard; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Processing time of addition or withdrawal of single or combined balance-stabilizing haptic and visual information.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Honeine; Oscar Crisafulli; Stefania Sozzi; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Cortical activity differs between position- and force-control knee extension tasks.

Authors:  Peter C Poortvliet; Kylie J Tucker; Simon Finnigan; Dion Scott; Paul Sowman; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Loss of balance during balance beam walking elicits a multifocal theta band electrocortical response.

Authors:  Amy R Sipp; Joseph T Gwin; Scott Makeig; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Changes in the activity of the cerebral cortex relate to postural response modification when warned of a perturbation.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Katsuo Fujiwara; Hidehito Tomita; Naoe Furune; Kenji Kunita; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Cognition and balance control: does processing of explicit contextual cues of impending perturbations modulate automatic postural responses?

Authors:  Daniel Boari Coelho; Luis Augusto Teixeira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Attentional requirements of postural control in people with spinal cord injury: the effect of dual task.

Authors:  C M Tse; M G Carpenter; T Liu-Ambrose; A E Chisholm; T Lam
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Body sway adaptation to addition but not withdrawal of stabilizing visual information is delayed by a concurrent cognitive task.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Honeine; Oscar Crisafulli; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Postural and cortical responses following visual occlusion in standing and sitting tasks.

Authors:  Kwang Leng Goh; Susan Morris; Wee Lih Lee; Alexander Ring; Tele Tan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.