Literature DB >> 15875978

Item-specific processing reduces false memories.

David P McCabe1, Alison G Presmanes, Chuck L Robertson, Anderson D Smith.   

Abstract

We examined the effect of item-specific and relational encoding instructions on false recognition in two experiments in which the DRM paradigm was used (Deese, 1959; Roediger & McDermott, 1995). Type of encoding (item-specific or relational) was manipulated between subjects in Experiment 1 and within subjects in Experiment 2. Decision-based explanations (e.g., the distinctiveness heuristic) predict reductions in false recognition in between-subjects designs, but not in within-subjects designs, because they are conceptualized as global shifts in decision criteria. Memory-based explanations predict reductions in false recognition in both designs, resulting from enhanced recollection of item-specific details. False recognition was reduced following item-specific encoding instructions in both experiments, favoring a memory-based explanation. These results suggest that providing unique cues for the retrieval of individual studied items results in enhanced discrimination between those studied items and critical lures. Conversely, enhancing the similarity of studied items results in poor discrimination among items within a particular list theme. These results are discussed in terms of the item-specific/ relational framework (Hunt & McDaniel, 1993).

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15875978     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  15 in total

Review 1.  Toward a psychology of memory accuracy.

Authors:  A Koriat; M Goldsmith; A Pansky
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Norms for word lists that create false memories.

Authors:  M A Stadler; H L Roediger; K B McDermott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

3.  Older adults encode--but do not always use--perceptual details: intentional versus unintentional effects of detail on memory judgments.

Authors:  Wilma Koutstaal
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-03

4.  On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.

Authors:  J DEESE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-07

5.  The subtlety of distinctiveness: What von Restorff really did.

Authors:  R R Hunt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-03

6.  Retrieval conditions and false recognition: testing the distinctiveness heuristic.

Authors:  D L Schacter; D L Cendan; C S Dodson; E R Clifford
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

7.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

Review 8.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Truth and character: sources that older adults can remember.

Authors:  Tamara A Rahhal; Cynthia P May; Lynn Hasher
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-03

10.  "If I had said it I would have remembered it": reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic.

Authors:  C S Dodson; D L Schacter
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03
View more
  26 in total

1.  "Identify-to-reject": a specific strategy to avoid false memories in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Paula Carneiro; Angel Fernandez; Emiliano Diez; Leonel Garcia-Marques; Tânia Ramos; Mário B Ferreira
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

Review 2.  False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion.

Authors:  David A Gallo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

3.  How Does Distinctive Processing Reduce False Recall?

Authors:  R Reed Hunt; Rebekah E Smith; Kathryn R Dunlap
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Falsely recalled items are rich in item-specific information.

Authors:  Daniel J Burns; Carin L Jenkins; Erica E Dean
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

5.  Generation and mnemonic encoding induce a mirror effect in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Raymond W Guntre; Glen E Bodner; Tanjeem Azad
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

6.  The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory.

Authors:  Enmanuelle Pardilla-Delgado; Jessica D Payne
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Item-specific processing reduces false recognition in older and younger adults: Separating encoding and retrieval using signal detection and the diffusion model.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Andrew J Aschenbrenner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-11

8.  Positive and negative affect, depression, and cognitive processes in the Cognition in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (Co-STAR) Trial.

Authors:  Suzanne C Danhauer; Claudine Legault; Hanna Bandos; Kelley Kidwell; Joseph Costantino; Leslie Vaughan; Nancy E Avis; Steve Rapp; Laura H Coker; Michelle Naughton; Cecile Naylor; Antonio Terracciano; Sally Shumaker
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2012-12-14

9.  Using Implicit Instructional Cues to Influence False Memory Induction.

Authors:  Laura K Cirelli; Joël Dickinson; Marie Poirier
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-10

10.  The costs and benefits of testing and guessing on recognition memory.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; David A Balota; Keith A Hutchison
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.