Literature DB >> 20921097

False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion.

David A Gallo1.   

Abstract

This article reviews research using the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) associative memory illusion, whereby people falsely remember words that were not presented. This illusion has broadly influenced basic theories of memory in cognitive psychology and neuroscience and naturally raises the question as to how these theories apply to more complex autobiographical memories. Some applicability is evident from research linking individual differences in the DRM illusion to false autobiographical memories (e.g., misremembering public events) and fantastic autobiographical beliefs (e.g., memories from past lives). But which aspects generalize? Here it is argued that a process-oriented approach is needed in order to answer this question. Many productive years of DRM research indicate that multiple and often opposing psychological processes cause even the most basic false memories. In light of these discoveries, more researchers need to use methods that isolate these component processes if the goal is to understand false memories both in the lab and in life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20921097     DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.7.833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  124 in total

1.  Factors that determine false recall: a multiple regression analysis.

Authors:  H L Roediger; J M Watson; K B McDermott; D A Gallo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  Are covert verbal responses mediating false implicit memory?

Authors:  Martin Lövdén; Mikael Johansson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

3.  Recollection rejection: false-memory editing in children and adults.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; V F Reyna; Ron Wright; A H Mojardin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Age differences in veridical and false recall are not inevitable: the role of frontal lobe function.

Authors:  Karin M Butler; Mark A McDaniel; Courtney C Dornburg; Amanda L Price; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

5.  Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory.

Authors:  Scott D Slotnick; Chad S Dodson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-01

6.  Divided attention during retrieval suppresses false recognition in confabulation.

Authors:  Elisa Ciaramelli; Simona Ghetti; Marco Borsotti
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Reduced false memory after sleep.

Authors:  Kimberly M Fenn; David A Gallo; Daniel Margoliash; Henry L Roediger; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Invariance in automatic influences of memory: toward a user's guide for the process-dissociation procedure.

Authors:  L L Jacoby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  "If I had said it I would have remembered it": reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic.

Authors:  C S Dodson; D L Schacter
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

Review 10.  Developmental reversals in false memory: a review of data and theory.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; V F Reyna; S J Ceci
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  82 in total

1.  Age-related differences in prefrontal cortex activity during retrieval monitoring: testing the compensation and dysfunction accounts.

Authors:  Ian M McDonough; Jessica T Wong; David A Gallo
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  "Identify-to-reject": a specific strategy to avoid false memories in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Paula Carneiro; Angel Fernandez; Emiliano Diez; Leonel Garcia-Marques; Tânia Ramos; Mário B Ferreira
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

3.  Fuzzy-Trace Theory and Lifespan Cognitive Development.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2015-12-01

4.  Categorical and associative relations increase false memory relative to purely associative relations.

Authors:  Jennifer H Coane; Dawn M McBride; Miia-Liisa Termonen; J Cooper Cutting
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

5.  Neural mechanisms of reactivation-induced updating that enhance and distort memory.

Authors:  Peggy L St Jacques; Christopher Olm; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Retrieval Expectations Affect False Recollection: Insights from a Criterial Recollection Task.

Authors:  David A Gallo
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-08-01

Review 7.  Theoretical and forensic implications of developmental studies of the DRM illusion.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; V F Reyna; E Zember
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

8.  The role of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in individual differences in long-term memory capacity.

Authors:  Christian Montag; Andrea Felten; Sebastian Markett; Luise Fischer; Katja Winkel; Andrew Cooper; Martin Reuter
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.444

9.  The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory.

Authors:  Enmanuelle Pardilla-Delgado; Jessica D Payne
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Divergent thinking and constructing episodic simulations.

Authors:  Donna Rose Addis; Ling Pan; Regina Musicaro; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2014-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.