Literature DB >> 24807061

Using Implicit Instructional Cues to Influence False Memory Induction.

Laura K Cirelli1, Joël Dickinson, Marie Poirier.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that explicit cues specific to the encoding process (endogenous) or characteristic of the stimuli themselves (exogenous) can be used to direct a reader's attentional resources towards either relational or item-specific information. By directing attention to relational information (and therefore away from item-specific information) the rate of false memory induction can be increased. The purpose of the current study was to investigate if a similar effect would be found by manipulating implicitly endogenous cues. An instructional manipulation was used to influence the perceptual action participants performed on word stimuli during the encoding of DRM list words. Results demonstrated that the instructional conditions that encouraged faster processing also led to an increased rate of false memory induction for semantically related words, supporting the hypothesis that attention was directed towards relational information. This finding supports the impoverished relational processing account of false memory induction. This supports the idea that implicitly endogenous cues, exogenous cues (like font) or explicitly endogenous cues (like training) can direct attentional resources during encoding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24807061     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-014-9301-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  12 in total

1.  Factors that determine false recall: a multiple regression analysis.

Authors:  H L Roediger; J M Watson; K B McDermott; D A Gallo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  Norms for word lists that create false memories.

Authors:  M A Stadler; H L Roediger; K B McDermott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

3.  Why distinctive information reduces false memories: evidence for both impoverished relational-encoding and distinctiveness heuristic accounts.

Authors:  Amanda C G Hege; Chad S Dodson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Item-specific processing reduces false memories.

Authors:  David P McCabe; Alison G Presmanes; Chuck L Robertson; Anderson D Smith
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

5.  The effects of word frequency and similarity on recognition judgments: the role of recollection.

Authors:  Heekyeong Park; Lynne M Reder; Daniel Dickison
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  Models of recognition: a review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Lynne M Reder; Jason Arndt; Heekyeong Park
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

7.  Interactions between endogenous and exogenous attention on cortical visual processing.

Authors:  Joseph B Hopfinger; Vicki M West
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The influence of distinctive processing manipulations on older adults' false memory.

Authors:  Karin M Butler; Mark A McDaniel; David P McCabe; Courtney C Dornburg
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2009-07-29

9.  "If I had said it I would have remembered it": reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic.

Authors:  C S Dodson; D L Schacter
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

10.  Do you 'see' what I 'see'? Differentiation of visual action words.

Authors:  Joël Dickinson; Laura Cirelli; Frank Szeligo
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  The neurocognitive basis of borrowed context information.

Authors:  Meagan O'Neill; Rachel A Diana
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 4.027

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.