Literature DB >> 17910191

Generation and mnemonic encoding induce a mirror effect in the DRM paradigm.

Raymond W Guntre1, Glen E Bodner, Tanjeem Azad.   

Abstract

Encoding tasks that increase memory accuracy are appealing from both practical and theoretical perspectives. Within the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm, we found that generating list words from anagrams (relative to reading) produced a mirror effect: enhanced recognition of studied words coupled with a reduction in false recognition. Signal detection analyses suggest that the increase in correct recognition was due to enhanced item-specific encoding of the list words, whereas the reduction in false recognition was due to enhanced strategic monitoring at test (i.e., a distinctiveness heuristic), rather than to reduced relational encoding at study. Further support for a distinctiveness heuristic account was obtained using both "theme judgment" instructions and within-group conditions. In our final experiment, we replicated this mirror effect using a purely mnemonic (self-referential) encoding task, showing that extra perceptual cues are not necessary to induce participants to adopt a successful memory-improvement strategy at test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17910191     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  32 in total

1.  The effects of a levels-of-processing manipulation on false recall.

Authors:  M G Rhodes; J S Anastasi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

2.  False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: effects of retention interval and level of processing.

Authors:  A Thapar; K B McDermott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-04

3.  Distinctiveness and the recognition mirror effect: evidence for an item-based criterion placement heuristic.

Authors:  Ian G Dobbins; Neal E A Kroll
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Similarity and contrast in memory for relations.

Authors:  I Begg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1978-09

5.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

7.  On the dual effects of repetition on false recognition.

Authors:  A S Benjamin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  "If I had said it I would have remembered it": reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic.

Authors:  C S Dodson; D L Schacter
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

9.  "If I didn't write it, why would I remember it?" Effects of encoding, attention, and practice on accurate and false memory.

Authors:  John G Seamon; Madeleine S Goodkind; Adam D Dumey; Ester Dick; Marla S Aufseeser; Sarah E Strickland; Jeffrey R Woulfin; Nicholas S Fung
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

10.  Inducing and reducing false memories: a Swedish version of the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.

Authors:  Mikael Johansson; Georg Stenberg
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2002-12
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion.

Authors:  David A Gallo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

2.  Separating past and future autobiographical events in memory: evidence for a reality monitoring asymmetry.

Authors:  Ian M McDonough; David A Gallo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-01

3.  Item-specific processing reduces false recognition in older and younger adults: Separating encoding and retrieval using signal detection and the diffusion model.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Andrew J Aschenbrenner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-11

4.  All varieties of encoding variability are not created equal: Separating variable processing from variable tasks.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Glen E Bodner
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Effects of distinctive encoding on correct and false memory: a meta-analytic review of costs and benefits and their origins in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Glen E Bodner; Jonathan M Fawcett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

6.  Reducing False Recognition in the Deese-Roediger/McDermott Paradigm: Related Lures Reveal How Distinctive Encoding Improves Encoding and Monitoring Processes.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Glen E Bodner; Matthew R Gretz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-20

7.  Encoding strategy affects false recall and recognition: Evidence from categorical study material.

Authors:  Justyna Olszewska; Joanna Ulatowska
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-03-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.