Literature DB >> 11848606

Retrieval conditions and false recognition: testing the distinctiveness heuristic.

D L Schacter1, D L Cendan, C S Dodson, E R Clifford.   

Abstract

High levels of false recognition are observed after people study lists of semantic associates that all converge on a nonpresented lure word. In previous experiments, we have found that orienting participants to encode distinctive information about study list items by presenting them as pictures as opposed to words produces marked reductions in false recognition. We have suggested that these reductions reflect the operation of a distinctiveness heuristic: Participants demand access to detailed pictorial information in order to support a positive recognition decision. The present experiments provide additional evidence on this point and allow us to distinguish between the distinctiveness heuristic account and an alternative account based on the impoverished encoding of relational information that occurs when one is studying pictures. In Experiment 1, even when only half of the items in a study list were presented as pictures, a general suppression of false recognition was observed that could be attributable to impoverished encoding of relational information. Experiment 2 provided a critical test of the distinctiveness heuristic account: We manipulated test instructions and found that differences in false recognition rates between picture and word encoding were attenuated in a retrieval condition that did not encourage reliance on a distinctiveness heuristic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11848606     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  8 in total

1.  Metacognition and memory for nonoccurrence.

Authors:  C M Rotello
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1999-01

2.  Illusory memories in amnesic patients: conceptual and perceptual false recognition.

Authors:  D L Schacter; M Verfaellie; M D Anes
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  FALSE RECOGNITION PRODUCED BY IMPLICIT VERBAL RESPONSES.

Authors:  B J UNDERWOOD
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-07

4.  On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.

Authors:  J DEESE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-07

5.  Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; D E Huber; K Marinelli
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 7.  The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory.

Authors:  D L Schacter; K A Norman; W Koutstaal
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  "If I had said it I would have remembered it": reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic.

Authors:  C S Dodson; D L Schacter
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03
  8 in total
  22 in total

1.  The effects of emotional content and aging on false memories.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kensinger; Suzanne Corkin
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  "Identify-to-reject": a specific strategy to avoid false memories in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Paula Carneiro; Angel Fernandez; Emiliano Diez; Leonel Garcia-Marques; Tânia Ramos; Mário B Ferreira
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

Review 3.  False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion.

Authors:  David A Gallo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

4.  How Does Distinctive Processing Reduce False Recall?

Authors:  R Reed Hunt; Rebekah E Smith; Kathryn R Dunlap
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Item-specific processing reduces false memories.

Authors:  David P McCabe; Alison G Presmanes; Chuck L Robertson; Anderson D Smith
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

6.  The modality effect in false recognition: evidence for test-based monitoring.

Authors:  Benton H Pierce; David A Gallo; Jonathan A Weiss; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-12

7.  Speeded retrieval abolishes the false-memory suppression effect: evidence for the distinctiveness heuristic.

Authors:  Chad S Dodson; Amanda C G Hege
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

8.  Falsely recalled items are rich in item-specific information.

Authors:  Daniel J Burns; Carin L Jenkins; Erica E Dean
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

9.  Can false memories be corrected by feedback in the DRM paradigm?

Authors:  Melissa D McConnell; R Reed Hunt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

10.  Generation and mnemonic encoding induce a mirror effect in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Raymond W Guntre; Glen E Bodner; Tanjeem Azad
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.