Literature DB >> 29959616

Item-specific processing reduces false recognition in older and younger adults: Separating encoding and retrieval using signal detection and the diffusion model.

Mark J Huff1, Andrew J Aschenbrenner2.   

Abstract

Our study examined processing effects in improving memory accuracy in older and younger adults. Specifically, we evaluated the effectiveness of item-specific and relational processing instructions relative to a read-only control task on correct and false recognition in younger and older adults using a categorized-list paradigm. In both age groups, item-specific and relational processing improved correct recognition versus a read-only control task, and item-specific encoding decreased false recognition relative to both the relational and read-only groups. This pattern was found in older adults despite overall elevated rates of false recognition. We then applied signal-detection and diffusion-modeling analyses, which separately utilized recognition responses and the latencies to those responses to estimate contributions of encoding and monitoring processes on recognition decisions. Converging evidence from both analyses demonstrated that item-specific processing benefits to memory accuracy were due to improvements of both encoding (estimates of d' and drift rate) and monitoring (estimates of lambda and boundary separation) processes, and, importantly, occurred similarly in both younger and older adults. Thus, older and younger adults showed similar encoding-based and test-based benefits of item-specific processing to enhance memory accuracy.

Keywords:  Diffusion modeling; Distinctiveness; Item-specific processing; Relational processing; Signal detection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29959616     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-018-0837-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  44 in total

1.  Source attributions and false memories: a test of the demand characteristics account.

Authors:  J M Lampinen; J S Neuschatz; D G Payne
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

2.  False memories and the DRM paradigm: effects of imagery, list, and test type.

Authors:  Merrin Creath Oliver; Rebecca Brooke Bays; Karen M Zabrucky
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2016

3.  Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type.

Authors:  D H Spieler; D A Balota; M E Faust
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The effect of forced recall on illusory recollection in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Michelle L Meade; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2006

5.  The influence of distinctive processing manipulations on older adults' false memory.

Authors:  Karin M Butler; Mark A McDaniel; David P McCabe; Courtney C Dornburg
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2009-07-29

6.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Using diffusion models to understand clinical disorders.

Authors:  Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff; Michael W Vasey; Gail McKoon
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.223

8.  The ironic effect of guessing: increased false memory for mediated lists in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Jennifer H Coane; Mark J Huff; Keith A Hutchison
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2015-09-22

9.  Why do pictures, but not visual words, reduce older adults' false memories?

Authors:  Rebekah E Smith; R Reed Hunt; Kathryn R Dunlap
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-07-27

10.  Effects of distinctive encoding on correct and false memory: a meta-analytic review of costs and benefits and their origins in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Glen E Bodner; Jonathan M Fawcett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04
View more
  4 in total

1.  Age differences in diffusion model parameters: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maximilian Theisen; Veronika Lerche; Mischa von Krause; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-06-13

2.  Reducing False Recognition in the Deese-Roediger/McDermott Paradigm: Related Lures Reveal How Distinctive Encoding Improves Encoding and Monitoring Processes.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Glen E Bodner; Matthew R Gretz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-20

3.  Are age differences in recognition-based retrieval monitoring an epiphenomenon of age differences in memory?

Authors:  Christopher Hertzog; Taylor Curley; John Dunlosky
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2021-04-01

4.  Disentangling the Effects of Processing Speed on the Association between Age Differences and Fluid Intelligence.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Schubert; Dirk Hagemann; Christoph Löffler; Gidon T Frischkorn
Journal:  J Intell       Date:  2019-12-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.