Literature DB >> 28190038

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory.

Enmanuelle Pardilla-Delgado1, Jessica D Payne2.   

Abstract

The Deese, Roediger and McDermott (DRM) task is a false memory paradigm in which subjects are presented with lists of semantically related words (e.g., nurse, hospital, etc.) at encoding. After a delay, subjects are asked to recall or recognize these words. In the recognition memory version of the task, subjects are asked whether they remember previously presented words, as well as related (but never presented) critical lure words ('doctor'). Typically, the critical word is recognized with high probability and confidence. This false memory effect has been robustly demonstrated across short (e.g., immediate, 20 min) and long (e.g., 1, 7, 60 d) delays between encoding and memory testing. A strength of using this task to study false memory is its simplicity and short duration. If encoding and retrieval components of the task occur in the same session, the entire task can take as little as 2 - 30 min. However, although the DRM task is widely considered a 'false memory' paradigm, some researchers consider DRM illusions to be based on the activation of semantic memory networks in the brain, and argue that such semantic gist-based false memory errors may actually be useful in some scenarios (e.g., remembering the forest for the trees; remembering that a word list was about "doctors", even though the actual word "doctor" was never presented for study). Remembering the gist of experience (instead of or along with individual details) is arguably an adaptive process and this task has provided a great deal of knowledge about the constructive, adaptive nature of memory. Therefore, researchers should use caution when discussing the overall reach and implications of their experiments when using this task to study 'false memory', as DRM memory errors may not adequately reflect false memories in the real world, such as false memory in eyewitness testimony, or false memories of sexual abuse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28190038      PMCID: PMC5407674          DOI: 10.3791/54793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  46 in total

1.  Factors that determine false recall: a multiple regression analysis.

Authors:  H L Roediger; J M Watson; K B McDermott; D A Gallo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: effects of retention interval and level of processing.

Authors:  A Thapar; K B McDermott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-04

3.  Are covert verbal responses mediating false implicit memory?

Authors:  Martin Lövdén; Mikael Johansson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

4.  False recognition with the Deese-Roediger-McDermott-Reid-Solso procedure: a quantitative summary.

Authors:  Stuart J McKelvie
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2004-06

5.  Comparing decay rates for accurate and false memories in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Jorie M Colbertr; Dawn M McBride
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

6.  From a passing thought to a false memory in 2 minutes: Confusing real and illusory events.

Authors:  J D Read
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-03

7.  Reduced false memory after sleep.

Authors:  Kimberly M Fenn; David A Gallo; Daniel Margoliash; Henry L Roediger; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  The relationship between DRM and misinformation false memories.

Authors:  Bi Zhu; Chuansheng Chen; Elizabeth F Loftus; Chongde Lin; Qi Dong
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-08

9.  Neural activity during encoding predicts false memories created by misinformation.

Authors:  Yoko Okado; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  True and false memories in maltreated children.

Authors:  Mark L Howe; Dante Cicchetti; Sheree L Toth; Beth M Cerrito
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct
View more
  5 in total

1.  Theta Activity During Encoding Interacts With NREM Sleep Oscillations to Predict Memory Generalization.

Authors:  Tamara Gibson; Zachariah R Cross; Alex Chatburn
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 2.  Emotion Processing Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease: An Overview of Behavioral Findings, Systems Neural Correlates, and Underlying Neural Biology.

Authors:  Shefali Chaudhary; Simon Zhornitsky; Herta H Chao; Christopher H van Dyck; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.632

3.  The Trajectory of Targets and Critical Lures in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott Paradigm: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Patricia I Coburn; Kirandeep K Dogra; Iarenjit K Rai; Daniel M Bernstein
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-03

4.  The role of KIBRA in reconstructive episodic memory.

Authors:  Armin Zlomuzica; Friederike Preusser; Susanna Roberts; Marcella L Woud; Kathryn J Lester; Ekrem Dere; Thalia C Eley; Jürgen Margraf
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 6.354

5.  Virtual environments as memory training devices in navigational tasks for older adults.

Authors:  Ismini E Lokka; Arzu Çöltekin; Jan Wiener; Sara I Fabrikant; Christina Röcke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.