Literature DB >> 22929652

Stability of echogenic liposomes as a blood pool ultrasound contrast agent in a physiologic flow phantom.

Kirthi Radhakrishnan1, Kevin J Haworth, Shao-Ling Huang, Melvin E Klegerman, David D McPherson, Christy K Holland.   

Abstract

Echogenic liposomes (ELIP) are multifunctional ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) with a lipid shell encapsulating both air and an aqueous core. ELIP are being developed for molecular imaging and image-guided therapeutic delivery. Stability of the echogenicity of ELIP in physiologic conditions is crucial to their successful translation to clinical use. In this study, we determined the effects of the surrounding media's dissolved air concentration, temperature transition and hydrodynamic pressure on the echogenicity of a chemically modified formulation of ELIP to promote stability and echogenicity. ELIP samples were diluted in porcine plasma or whole blood and pumped through a pulsatile flow system with adjustable hydrodynamic pressures and temperature. B-mode images were acquired using a clinical diagnostic scanner every 5 s for a total duration of 75 s. Echogenicity in porcine plasma was assessed as a function of total dissolved gas saturation. ELIP were added to plasma at room temperature (22 °C) or body temperature (37 °C) and pumped through a system maintained at 22 °C or 37 °C to study the effect of temperature transitions on ELIP echogenicity. Echogenicity at normotensive (120/80 mmHg) and hypertensive pressures (145/90 mmHg) was measured. ELIP were echogenic in plasma and whole blood at body temperature under normotensive to hypertensive pressures. Warming of samples from room temperature to body temperature did not alter echogenicity. However, in plasma cooled rapidly from body temperature to room temperature or in degassed plasma, ELIP lost echogenicity within 20 s at 120/80 mmHg. The stability of echogenicity of a modified ELIP formulation was determined in vitro at body temperature, physiologic gas concentration and throughout the physiologic pressure range. However, proper care should be taken to ensure that ELIP are not cooled rapidly from body temperature to room temperature as they will lose their echogenic properties. Further in vivo investigations will be needed to evaluate the optimal usage of ELIP as blood pool contrast agents.
Copyright © 2012 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22929652      PMCID: PMC4919816          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  64 in total

1.  Pressure dependence of subharmonic signals from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  W T Shi; F Forsberg; J S Raichlen; L Needleman; B B Goldberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Bolus versus continuous infusion of microbubble contrast agent for liver US: initial experience.

Authors:  Masahiro Okada; Christian W Hoffmann; Karl J Wolf; Thomas Albrecht
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  In vivo pressure estimation using subharmonic contrast microbubble signals: proof of concept.

Authors:  Flemming Forsberg; Ji-Bin Liu; William T Shi; Junji Furuse; Masafumi Shimizu; Barry B Goldberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 4.  Neutrophil kinetics and lung injury.

Authors:  J C Hogg
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Study of the patency of small arterial branches after stent placement with an experimental in vivo model.

Authors:  Osamu Masuo; Tomoaki Terada; Gary Walker; Mitsuharu Tsuura; Hiroyuki Matsumoto; Kazuo Tohya; Michio Kimura; Kunio Nakai; Toru Itakura
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Effect of anesthesia carrier gas on in vivo circulation times of ultrasound microbubble contrast agents in rats.

Authors:  Lee Mullin; Ryan Gessner; James Kwan; Mehmet Kaya; Mark A Borden; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Pulsatile pressure affects the disappearance of echocardiographic contrast agents.

Authors:  L R Padial; M H Chen; C Vuille; J L Guerrero; A E Weyman; M H Picard
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.251

8.  Ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis with tPA-loaded echogenic liposomes.

Authors:  George J Shaw; Jason M Meunier; Shao-Ling Huang; Christopher J Lindsell; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.944

9.  Interactions of liposomes with serum proteins.

Authors:  F Bonté; R L Juliano
Journal:  Chem Phys Lipids       Date:  1986 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.329

10.  Delivery of stem cells to porcine arterial wall with echogenic liposomes conjugated to antibodies against CD34 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1.

Authors:  Stephanie M Herbst; Melvin E Klegerman; Hyunggun Kim; Jiangbo Qi; Harnath Shelat; Michael Wassler; Melanie R Moody; Chen-Min Yang; Xinyi Ge; Yuejiao Zou; Jonathan A Kopechek; Fred J Clubb; Duane C Kraemer; Shaoling Huang; Christy K Holland; David D McPherson; Yong-Jian Geng
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic potential of ultrasound microbubbles in gastrointestinal oncology: recent advances and future prospects.

Authors:  Tatiana D Khokhlova; Yasser Haider; Joo Ha Hwang
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.409

2.  Sequential HIFU heating and nanobubble encapsulation provide efficient drug penetration from stealth and temperature sensitive liposomes in colon cancer.

Authors:  Joshua VanOsdol; Kalyani Ektate; Selvarani Ramasamy; Danny Maples; Willie Collins; Jerry Malayer; Ashish Ranjan
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  Loss of gas from echogenic liposomes exposed to pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  Jason L Raymond; Ying Luan; Tao Peng; Shao-Ling Huang; David D McPherson; Michel Versluis; Nico de Jong; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Effect of Temperature on the Size Distribution, Shell Properties, and Stability of Definity®.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Nathaniel J Smith; Jason L Raymond; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Cavitation thresholds of contrast agents in an in vitro human clot model exposed to 120-kHz ultrasound.

Authors:  Matthew J Gruber; Kenneth B Bader; Christy K Holland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Nitric oxide pretreatment enhances atheroma component highlighting in vivo with intercellular adhesion molecule-1-targeted echogenic liposomes.

Authors:  Patrick H Kee; Hyunggun Kim; Shaoling Huang; Susan T Laing; Melanie R Moody; Deborah Vela; Melvin E Klegerman; David D McPherson
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Relationship between cavitation and loss of echogenicity from ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Kirthi Radhakrishnan; Kenneth B Bader; Kevin J Haworth; Jonathan A Kopechek; Jason L Raymond; Shao-Ling Huang; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Loss of echogenicity and onset of cavitation from echogenic liposomes: pulse repetition frequency independence.

Authors:  Kirthi Radhakrishnan; Kevin J Haworth; Tao Peng; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Clot retraction affects the extent of ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis in an ex vivo porcine thrombosis model.

Authors:  Jonathan T Sutton; Nikolas M Ivancevich; Stephen R Perrin; Deborah C Vela; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 10.  Current status and prospects for microbubbles in ultrasound theranostics.

Authors:  K Heath Martin; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2013-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.