Literature DB >> 15845248

Systematic distortions of perceptual stability investigated using immersive virtual reality.

Lili Tcheang1, Stuart J Gilson, Andrew Glennerster.   

Abstract

Using an immersive virtual reality system, we measured the ability of observers to detect the rotation of an object when its movement was yoked to the observer's own translation. Most subjects had a large bias such that a static object appeared to rotate away from them as they moved. Thresholds for detecting target rotation were similar to those for an equivalent speed discrimination task carried out by static observers, suggesting that visual discrimination is the predominant limiting factor in detecting target rotation. Adding a stable visual reference frame almost eliminated the bias. Varying the viewing distance of the target had little effect, consistent with observers underestimating distance walked. However, accuracy of walking to a briefly presented visual target was high and not consistent with an underestimation of distance walked. We discuss implications for theories of a task-independent representation of visual space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15845248      PMCID: PMC2833395          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  34 in total

1.  Self-motion and the perception of stationary objects.

Authors:  M Wexler; F Panerai; I Lamouret; J Droulez
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A theory of phenomenal geometry and its applications.

Authors:  W C Gogel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-08

3.  The imprecision of stereopsis.

Authors:  S P McKee; D M Levi; S F Bowne
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Terrain influences the accurate judgement of distance.

Authors:  M J Sinai; T L Ooi; Z J He
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Stereoscopic depth constancy depends on the subject's task.

Authors:  A Glennerster; B J Rogers; M F Bradshaw
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions.

Authors:  J W Philbeck; J M Loomis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion.

Authors:  M S Landy; L T Maloney; E B Johnston; M Young
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion?

Authors:  J A Thomson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception.

Authors:  B Rogers; M Graham
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Binocular distance perception.

Authors:  J M Foley
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  17 in total

1.  Inaccurate representation of the ground surface beyond a texture boundary.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Spatial calibration of an optical see-through head-mounted display.

Authors:  Stuart J Gilson; Andrew W Fitzgibbon; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Neural activity underlying the detection of an object movement by an observer during forward self-motion: Dynamic decoding and temporal evolution of directional cortical connectivity.

Authors:  N Kozhemiako; A S Nunes; A Samal; K D Rana; F J Calabro; M S Hämäläinen; S Khan; L M Vaina
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 11.685

4.  Cue combination for 3D location judgements.

Authors:  Ellen Svarverud; Stuart J Gilson; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Experience affects the use of ego-motion signals during 3D shape perception.

Authors:  Anshul Jain; Benjamin T Backus
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Quantitative analysis of accuracy of an inertial/acoustic 6DOF tracking system in motion.

Authors:  Stuart J Gilson; Andrew W Fitzgibbon; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Humans ignore motion and stereo cues in favor of a fictional stable world.

Authors:  Andrew Glennerster; Lili Tcheang; Stuart J Gilson; Andrew W Fitzgibbon; Andrew J Parker
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  How soccer players head the ball: a test of Optic Acceleration Cancellation theory with virtual reality.

Authors:  Peter McLeod; Nick Reed; Stuart Gilson; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Joint representation of depth from motion parallax and binocular disparity cues in macaque area MT.

Authors:  Jacob W Nadler; Daniel Barbash; HyungGoo R Kim; Swati Shimpi; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Visual and non-visual contributions to the perception of object motion during self-motion.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen; Jonathan S Matthis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.