Literature DB >> 2288089

The imprecision of stereopsis.

S P McKee1, D M Levi, S F Bowne.   

Abstract

In comparison to lateral judgments of distance, stereoscopic judgments are not precise. Although stereoacuity thresholds for targets presented in the fixation plane can equal the best thresholds for the monocular hyperacuities, i.e. a few sec arc, the increment thresholds for disparity are substantially larger than the increment thresholds for lateral separation (width). We measured the minimum detectable change in the three-dimensional distance separating two features, one presented in the fixation plane, and the other some distance in front of it, i.e. with a significant standing disparity between the two features. For briefly-presented targets (150 msec), the Weber fraction for disparity was 10-20% over the range from 1 to 20 min arc, while the Weber fraction for width was only 2-3% under comparable conditions. The disparity thresholds were substantially improved for a longer duration target (1000 msec), but they were still a factor of two worse than the monocular width thresholds. In a related experiment, the vernier acuity for a standard vernier target was profoundly degraded by pairing the offset upper line presented to one eye with a disparate line in the other eye; the vernier threshold was elevated for disparities ranging from 3 to 30 min arc. This finding shows that the more precise monocular signals are actively suppressed in fused or partially-fused stereoscopic images.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2288089     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90158-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  32 in total

1.  Planar motion permits perception of metric structure in stereopsis.

Authors:  J S Lappin; S R Love
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-01

2.  Importance of binocular vision in foot placement accuracy when stepping onto a floor-based target during gait initiation.

Authors:  Graham J Chapman; Andy Scally; John G Buckley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Natural-scene statistics predict how the figure-ground cue of convexity affects human depth perception.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Charless C Fowlkes; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Eye-hand coordination while pointing rapidly under risk.

Authors:  Anna Ma-Wyatt; Martin Stritzke; Julia Trommershäuser
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Hysteresis, cooperativity, and depth averaging in dynamic random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  B L Anderson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-06

6.  Systematic distortions of perceptual stability investigated using immersive virtual reality.

Authors:  Lili Tcheang; Stuart J Gilson; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Stereo sensitivity depends on stereo matching.

Authors:  Suzanne P McKee; Preeti Verghese; Bart Farell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The wallpaper illusion explained.

Authors:  Suzanne P McKee; Preeti Verghese; Anna Ma-Wyatt; Yury Petrov
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Physiology of suppression in strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  R Harrad; F Sengpiel; C Blakemore
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Angular declination and the dynamic perception of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; John W Philbeck; Philip W Wirtz; David Chichka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.