Literature DB >> 18472123

How soccer players head the ball: a test of Optic Acceleration Cancellation theory with virtual reality.

Peter McLeod1, Nick Reed, Stuart Gilson, Andrew Glennerster.   

Abstract

We measured the movements of soccer players heading a football in a fully immersive virtual reality environment. In mid-flight the ball's trajectory was altered from its normal quasi-parabolic path to a linear one, producing a jump in the rate of change of the angle of elevation of gaze (alpha) from player to ball. One reaction time later the players adjusted their speed so that the rate of change of alpha increased when it had been reduced and reduced it when it had been increased. Since the result of the player's movement was to regain a value of the rate of change close to that before the disturbance, the data suggest that the players have an expectation of, and memory for, the pattern that the rate of change of alpha will follow during the flight. The results support the general claim that players intercepting balls use servo control strategies and are consistent with the particular claim of Optic Acceleration Cancellation theory that the servo strategy is to allow alpha to increase at a steadily decreasing rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18472123      PMCID: PMC2833397          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  Adaptation to visual feedback delays in a human manual tracking task.

Authors:  A J Foulkes; R C Miall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Controlled variables: psychology as the center fielder views it.

Authors:  R S Marken
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2001

3.  Toward a unified fielder theory: what we do not yet know about how people run to catch a ball.

Authors:  P McLeod; N Reed; Z Dienes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  A linear optical trajectory informs the fielder where to run to the side to catch fly balls.

Authors:  Dennis M Shaffer; Michael K McBeath; Windy L Roy; Scott M Krauchunas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Psychophysics: how fielders arrive in time to catch the ball.

Authors:  Peter McLeod; Nick Reed; Zoltan Dienes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Optical acceleration cancellation: a viable interception strategy?

Authors:  L A Rozendaal; A J Knoek van Soest
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  The optic trajectory is not a lot of use if you want to catch the ball.

Authors:  Peter McLeod; Nick Reed; Zoltan Dienes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The information for catching fly balls: judging and intercepting virtual balls in a CAVE.

Authors:  Frank T J M Zaal; Claire F Michaels
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The generalized optic acceleration cancellation theory of catching.

Authors:  Peter McLeod; Nick Reed; Zoltan Dienes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Quantitative analysis of accuracy of an inertial/acoustic 6DOF tracking system in motion.

Authors:  Stuart J Gilson; Andrew W Fitzgibbon; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  10 in total

1.  Base on balls for the Chapman strategy: reassessing Brouwer, Brenner, and Smeets (2002).

Authors:  Frank T J M Zaal; Raoul M Bongers; Gert-Jan Pepping; Reinoud J Bootsma
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Eye movements and manual interception of ballistic trajectories: effects of law of motion perturbations and occlusions.

Authors:  Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti; Gianfranco Bosco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  On-line and model-based approaches to the visual control of action.

Authors:  Huaiyong Zhao; William H Warren
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Catching fly balls in virtual reality: a critical test of the outfielder problem.

Authors:  Philip W Fink; Patrick S Foo; William H Warren
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Catching what we can't see: manual interception of occluded fly-ball trajectories.

Authors:  Gianfranco Bosco; Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Recognition of tennis serve performed by a digital player: comparison among polygon, shadow, and stick-figure models.

Authors:  Hirofumi Ida; Kazunobu Fukuhara; Motonobu Ishii
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Keeping your eyes continuously on the ball while running for catchable and uncatchable fly balls.

Authors:  Dees B W Postma; A Rob den Otter; Frank T J M Zaal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Assessing Visual Exploratory Activity of Athletes in Virtual Reality Using Head Motion Characteristics.

Authors:  Markus Wirth; Sebastian Kohl; Stefan Gradl; Rosanna Farlock; Daniel Roth; Bjoern M Eskofier
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  When a Fly Ball Is Out of Reach: Catchability Judgments Are Not Based on Optical Acceleration Cancelation.

Authors:  Dees B W Postma; Joanne Smith; Gert-Jan Pepping; Steven van Andel; Frank T J M Zaal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-07

10.  No free lunch in ball catching: A comparison of Cartesian and angular representations for control.

Authors:  Sebastian Höfer; Jörg Raisch; Marc Toussaint; Oliver Brock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.