Literature DB >> 29651754

Learning efficient visual search for stimuli containing diagnostic spatial configurations and color-shape conjunctions.

Eric A Reavis1,2,3, Sebastian M Frank4,5, Peter U Tse4.   

Abstract

Visual search is often slow and difficult for complex stimuli such as feature conjunctions. Search efficiency, however, can improve with training. Search for stimuli that can be identified by the spatial configuration of two elements (e.g., the relative position of two colored shapes) improves dramatically within a few hundred trials of practice. Several recent imaging studies have identified neural correlates of this learning, but it remains unclear what stimulus properties participants learn to use to search efficiently. Influential models, such as reverse hierarchy theory, propose two major possibilities: learning to use information contained in low-level image statistics (e.g., single features at particular retinotopic locations) or in high-level characteristics (e.g., feature conjunctions) of the task-relevant stimuli. In a series of experiments, we tested these two hypotheses, which make different predictions about the effect of various stimulus manipulations after training. We find relatively small effects of manipulating low-level properties of the stimuli (e.g., changing their retinotopic location) and some conjunctive properties (e.g., color-position), whereas the effects of manipulating other conjunctive properties (e.g., color-shape) are larger. Overall, the findings suggest conjunction learning involving such stimuli might be an emergent phenomenon that reflects multiple different learning processes, each of which capitalizes on different types of information contained in the stimuli. We also show that both targets and distractors are learned, and that reversing learned target and distractor identities impairs performance. This suggests that participants do not merely learn to discriminate target and distractor stimuli, they also learn stimulus identity mappings that contribute to performance improvements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Perceptual learning; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29651754      PMCID: PMC6035115          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-018-1516-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  61 in total

1.  Perceptual learning without perception.

Authors:  T Watanabe; J E Náñez; Y Sasaki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Perceptual learning.

Authors:  E J GIBSON
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1963       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity.

Authors:  A Karni; D Sagi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Setting up the target template in visual search.

Authors:  Timothy J Vickery; Li-Wei King; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality.

Authors:  H Egeth; D Dagenbach
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Decomposing visual search: evidence of multiple item-specific skills.

Authors:  A P Hillstrom; G D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning.

Authors:  M Ahissar; S Hochstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A specific and enduring improvement in visual motion discrimination.

Authors:  K Ball; R Sekuler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-11-12       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  No transfer of perceptual learning between similar stimuli in the same retinal position.

Authors:  M Fahle; M Morgan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Towards a whole brain model of Perceptual Learning.

Authors:  Marcello Maniglia; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2017-12-13
View more
  1 in total

1.  Visual search training benefits from the integrative effect of enhanced covert attention and optimized overt eye movements.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Zhibang Huang; Liang Li; Sheng Li
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.