Literature DB >> 15761708

The effect of single-level, total disc arthroplasty on sagittal balance parameters: a prospective study.

Jc Le Huec1, Y Basso, H Mathews, A Mehbod, S Aunoble, T Friesem, T Zdeblick.   

Abstract

A prospective radiographic study of the influence of total disc replacement on spinal sagittal balance. The goal of this study was to prospectively determine the effect of a single-level, total disc replacement on the sagittal balance of the spine, especially on sacral tilt (ST), pelvic tilt (PT), and lumbar lordosis. It has been shown that lumbar fusion may deleteriously alter the sagittal balance of the spine, including a decrease in the ST and lumbar lordosis. Clinically, postfusion pain has been shown to be significantly related to a decreased ST, increased PT, and decreased lumbar lordosis, independent of other factors such as pseudoarthrosis. To our knowledge, the influence of total disc replacement on spinal sagittal balance has not yet been reported in the literature. This is a prospective study of 35 patients who received a single level disc replacement using the Maverick Total Disc Arthroplasty system (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, Tennessee) by a single surgeon at one institution from March 2002 to September 2003. The preoperative and postoperative radiographic evaluation included standing anteroposterior and lateral full spine films that included the femoral heads. The parameters studied were ST, PT, global and segmental lordosis, and global kyphosis. The average age of the 35 patients studied was 44.3 years (range 35-57). There were 18 females and 17 males. The disc arthroplasty was performed at the L4-L5 level in 19 patients and at the L5-S1 level in 16 patients. The average follow-up was 14 months (range 6-22 months). The preoperative values of global lordosis, ST, and PT were 51.5 degrees , 37.8 degrees , 16.9 degrees and, at last follow-up, they were 51.4 degrees , 37.4 degrees , and 17.5 degrees , respectively. These changes were not significantly different. When the groups were separated according to the level operated, there was still no statistical difference with regard to the overall lordosis, ST, PT or kyphosis from pre- to postoperative period or when the two groups were compared with each other. The level above the prosthesis has always significantly less lordosis. In the present study with use of a motion-preserving Maverick prosthesis, it appears that the patient is able to maintain the preoperative sagittal balance. The prosthesis has enough freedom of motion to allow the patient to maintain the natural sagittal and spinopelvic balance needed to prevent potential undue stress on the muscles and the sacroiliac joint. Although the number of patients is small, this is the first study to our knowledge that evaluates the sagittal balance after motion-preserving total disc arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15761708      PMCID: PMC3454660          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0843-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  21 in total

1.  Segmental roentgenographic analysis of vertebral inclination on sagittal plane in asymptomatic versus chronic low back pain patients.

Authors:  P Korovessis; M Stamatakis; A Baikousis
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1999-04

2.  Sagittal profile of the elderly.

Authors:  E Mark Hammerberg; Kirkham B Wood
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-02

3.  Lumbar sagittal alignment after fusion with a threaded interbody cage.

Authors:  J A Goldstein; M J Macenski; S L Griffith; P C McAfee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications.

Authors:  Rudolf Bertagnoli; Selva Kumar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine.

Authors:  G Vaz; P Roussouly; E Berthonnaud; J Dimnet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain.

Authors:  J Y Lazennec; S Ramaré; N Arafati; C G Laudet; M Gorin; B Roger; S Hansen; G Saillant; L Maurs; R Trabelsi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  A multicenter retrospective study of the clinical results of the LINK SB Charité intervertebral prosthesis. The initial European experience.

Authors:  S L Griffith; A P Shelokov; K Büttner-Janz; J P LeMaire; W S Zeegers
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Stefan Gödde; Ekkehard Fritsch; Michael Dienst; Dieter Kohn
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  A Barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position.

Authors:  G Duval-Beaupère; C Schmidt; P Cosson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Long-term flexion-extension range of motion of the prodisc total disc replacement.

Authors:  Russel C Huang; Federico P Girardi; Frank P Cammisa; Patrick Tropiano; Thierry Marnay
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-10
View more
  25 in total

1.  The impact of implantation technique on frontal and sagittal alignment in total lumbar disc replacement: a comparison of anterior versus oblique implantation.

Authors:  René Schmidt; U Obertacke; J Nothwang; C Ulrich; J Nowicki; H Reichel; B Cakir
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Lumbar disc arthroplasty. Established technique or experimental procedure?].

Authors:  T L Schulte; V Bullmann; T Lerner; H F Halm; U Liljenqvist; L Hackenberg
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Chiara M Bellini; Thomas Zweig; Stephen Ferguson; Manuela T Raimondi; Claudio Lamartina; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Maurizio Fornari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Effect of prosthesis endplate lordosis angles on L5-S1 kinematics after disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Parmenion P Tsitsopoulos; Bartosz Wojewnik; Leonard I Voronov; Robert M Havey; Susan M Renner; Julia Zelenakova; Braden McIntosh; Gerard Carandang; Celeste Abjornson; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  [Dynamic instrumentation of the lumbar spine. Clinical and biomechanical analysis of success factors].

Authors:  Y P Charles; A Walter; S Schuller; J-P Steib
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  The role of prosthesis design on segmental biomechanics: semi-constrained versus unconstrained prostheses and anterior versus posterior centre of rotation.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; René Schmidt; Marcus Richter; Werner Schmoelz; Heiko Reichel; Balkan Cakir
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Optimizing success with lumbar disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew F Gornet; Francine Schranck; Nicholas D Wharton; Douglas P Beall; Elizabeth Jones; Mark E Myers; John A Hipp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Hybrid construct for two levels disc disease in lumbar spine.

Authors:  Stephane Aunoble; Robert Meyrat; Yasser Al Sawad; C Tournier; Philip Leijssen; Jean-Charles Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Sacroiliac joint syndrome 10 years after lumbar arthroplasty: the importance of spinopelvic alignment.

Authors:  Riccardo Ciarpaglini; Philippe Otten; Patrick Sutter; Vo Quoc Duy; Emanuel Gautier; Gianluca Maestretti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Analysis of post-operative pain patterns following total lumbar disc replacement: results from fluoroscopically guided spine infiltrations.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Andreas Korge; Frank Grochulla; Christoph Mehren; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.