Literature DB >> 24770556

Optimizing success with lumbar disc arthroplasty.

Matthew F Gornet1, Francine Schranck, Nicholas D Wharton, Douglas P Beall, Elizabeth Jones, Mark E Myers, John A Hipp.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed at determining the variables that may prove useful in predicting clinical outcomes following lumbar disc arthroplasty.
METHODS: Pre- and post-operative imaging assessments were obtained for 99 single-level lumbar disc arthroplasty patients from a prospective IDE study. The assessments and patient demographics were tested to identify variables that were significantly associated with clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: Clinical outcome data were available for 85 % of patients at the 5-year follow-up. Numerous assessments made from the pre-operative imaging were found to have statistically significant associations with clinical outcomes at 2 and 5 years. The most notable factors were related to the amount of degeneration at the index level, with patients achieving better outcome scores at 5 years if they have higher grades of degeneration preoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Several variables may prove effective at optimizing clinical outcomes including a preoperative disc height <8 mm, Modic type 2 changes adjacent to the target disc, a low amount of lordosis present at the treatment level, low levels of fatty replacement of the paraspinal musculature, a prominent amount of facet joint or disc degeneration, and the presence of flat or convex vertebral endplates. There were also post-operative findings associated with better patient outcomes including a larger percent of the endplate covered with the implant, larger implant heights, greater increases in disc space heights, and a larger increase in index level lumbar lordosis. These variables could be explored in other clinical studies to facilitate meta-analyses that could identify effective strategies to optimize clinical outcomes with lumbar disc arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24770556     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3309-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

1.  Correlation between the MRI changes in the lumbar multifidus muscles and leg pain.

Authors:  D F Kader; D Wardlaw; F W Smith
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Predictors of outcome after surgery with disc prosthesis and rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc: 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Christian Hellum; Lars Gunnar Johnsen; Øyvind Gjertsen; Linda Berg; Gesche Neckelmann; Oliver Grundnes; Ivar Rossvoll; Jan Sture Skouen; Jens Ivar Brox; Kjersti Storheim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Precision of lumbar intervertebral measurements: does a computer-assisted technique improve reliability?

Authors:  Adam M Pearson; Kevin F Spratt; James Genuario; William McGough; Katherine Kosman; Jon Lurie; Dilip K Sengupta
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Assessment of non-invasive intervertebral motion measurements in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Kristin Zhao; Chao Yang; Chunfeng Zhao; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging.

Authors:  M T Modic; P M Steinberg; J S Ross; T J Masaryk; J R Carter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  The effect of single-level, total disc arthroplasty on sagittal balance parameters: a prospective study.

Authors:  Jc Le Huec; Y Basso; H Mathews; A Mehbod; S Aunoble; T Friesem; T Zdeblick
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Influence of preoperative nucleus pulposus status and radiculopathy on outcomes in mono-segmental lumbar total disc replacement: results from a nationwide registry.

Authors:  Thomas Zweig; Christoph Hemmeler; Emin Aghayev; Markus Melloh; Christian Etter; Christoph Röder
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Anne G Copay; Sigurd H Berven; David W Polly; Brian R Subach; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Interdependence between disc space height, range of motion and clinical outcome in total lumbar disc replacement.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Wolfgang Hitzl; Peter Meschede; Ajay K Sharma; Mohamed F Khattab; Michael H Mayer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Does Vertebral Endplate Morphology Influence Outcomes in Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty? Part II: Clinical and Radiographic Results as Evaluated Utilizing the Vertebral Endplate Yue-Bertagnoli (VEYBR) Classification.

Authors:  Matthew E Oetgen; James J Yue; Jorge J Jaramillo-de la Torre; Rudolf Bertagnoli
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2008-06-01
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Do Modic changes have an impact on clinical outcome in lumbar spine surgery? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Aske Foldbjerg Laustsen; Rachid Bech-Azeddine
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Lumbar total disc replacement: predictors for long-term outcome.

Authors:  Håvard Furunes; Christian Hellum; Jens Ivar Brox; Ivar Rossvoll; Ansgar Espeland; Linda Berg; Helga Maria Brøgger; Milada Cvancarova Småstuen; Kjersti Storheim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Total Disc Replacement in Lumbar Degenerative Disc Diseases.

Authors:  Chun Kun Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-11-30

4.  ISASS Policy Statement - Lumbar Artificial Disc.

Authors:  Jack Zigler; Rolando Garcia
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-03-12

Review 5.  Evaluating the Impact of Modic Changes on Operative Treatment in the Cervical and Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mark J Lambrechts; Parker Brush; Tariq Z Issa; Gregory R Toci; Jeremy C Heard; Amit Syal; Meghan M Schilken; Jose A Canseco; Christopher K Kepler; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.