Literature DB >> 10766077

Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain.

J Y Lazennec1, S Ramaré, N Arafati, C G Laudet, M Gorin, B Roger, S Hansen, G Saillant, L Maurs, R Trabelsi.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to conduct a radiological analysis of posture before and after lumbosacral fusion to evaluate the influence of spinal alignment on the occurrence and pattern of post surgical pain. The study included 81 patients, of whom 51 had a history of previous low back surgery. We excluded patients with suspected or confirmed nonunion. In the fusion group, the 27 patients who were pain free after the procedure were compared to the 54 patients with residual pain. Thirty patients had pain only or primarily when they were standing immobile, 18 when they were sitting immobile, and six in both positions. Measurements were done on full-length lateral radiographs of the spine, with the patient standing according to Duval Beaupère criteria. The subgroup with postfusion pain was characterized at baseline by a more vertical sacrum with less sacral tilt (ST) (P < 0.0062) and more pelvic tilt (PT) (P < 0.0160). PT at last follow-up (PT fu) correlated with the presence of postfusion pain (NP: P = 0.0003). In the patients with postfusion pain, PT was almost twice the normal value. ST at last follow-up (ST fu) in the standing position was also correlated with the presence of postfusion pain (P < 0.0001) indicating that the sacrum remained abnormally vertical in the subjects with postfusion pain. Using logistic regression, the only prognostic factor for residual pain at last follow-up was ST fu. Both at pre-operative evaluation and at last follow-up, patients with pain in the standing position or in both the standing and sitting positions were characterized at pre-operative status by a more vertical sacrum with less sacral tilt. The results of this study indicate that, achieving a strong fusion should not be the only goal. Appropriate position of the fused vertebrae is also of paramount importance to minimize muscle work during posture maintenance. The main risk is failing to correct or to causing excessive pelvic retroversion with a vertical sacrum leading to a sagittal alignment that replicates the sitting position. This situation is often accompanied by loss of lumbar lordosis and adversely affects stiff or degenerative hips.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10766077      PMCID: PMC3611353          DOI: 10.1007/s005860050008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  126 in total

1.  Hip-spine relationship: a radio-anatomical study for optimization in acetabular cup positioning.

Authors:  J-Y Lazennec; N Charlot; M Gorin; B Roger; N Arafati; A Bissery; G Saillant
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Variations of caudal, central, and cranial acetabular anteversion according to the tilt of the pelvis.

Authors:  S Zilber; J Y Lazennec; M Gorin; G Saillant
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Influence of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures on spinal and pelvic parameters of sagittal balance.

Authors:  Mourad Ould-Slimane; Thibaut Lenoir; Cyril Dauzac; Ludovic Rillardon; Etienne Hoffmann; Pierre Guigui; Brice Ilharreborde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Prospective study of a new dynamic stabilisation system in the treatment of degenerative discopathy and instability of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A Zagra; L Minoia; M Archetti; A S Corriero; K Ricci; M Teli; F Giudici
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson's disease: experiences with the challenges posed by sagittal imbalance and the Parkinson's spine.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Frank Acosta; Juliane Zenner; Luis Ferraris; Wolfgang Hitzl; Oliver Meier; Steven Ondra; Tyler Koski; Rene Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The impact of implantation technique on frontal and sagittal alignment in total lumbar disc replacement: a comparison of anterior versus oblique implantation.

Authors:  René Schmidt; U Obertacke; J Nothwang; C Ulrich; J Nowicki; H Reichel; B Cakir
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Geometry of the vertebral bodies and the intervertebral discs in lumbar segments adjacent to spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: pilot study.

Authors:  Ella Been; Ling Li; David J Hunter; Leonid Kalichman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Normative values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, balance, age, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of healthy adult subjects.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Masashi Okamoto; Shun Hatsushikano; Haruka Shimoda; Masatoshi Ono; Kei Watanabe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The instant axis of rotation influences facet forces at L5/S1 during flexion/extension and lateral bending.

Authors:  Marc-Antoine Rousseau; David S Bradford; Tamer M Hadi; Kirk L Pedersen; Jeffery C Lotz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  [Lumbar disc arthroplasty. Established technique or experimental procedure?].

Authors:  T L Schulte; V Bullmann; T Lerner; H F Halm; U Liljenqvist; L Hackenberg
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.