Literature DB >> 19888610

Hybrid construct for two levels disc disease in lumbar spine.

Stephane Aunoble1, Robert Meyrat, Yasser Al Sawad, C Tournier, Philip Leijssen, Jean-Charles Le Huec.   

Abstract

Prospective study. To study the validity of Hybrid construction (Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion) ALIF at one level and total disc arthroplasty (TDA) at adjacent, for two levels disc disease in lumbar spine as surgical strategy. With growing evidence that fusion constructs in the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) may alter sagittal balance and contribute to undesirable complications in the long-term, total disc arthroplasty (TDA) slowly becomes an accepted treatment option for a selected group of patients. Despite encouraging early and intermediate term results of single-level total disc arthroplasty reported in the literature, there is growing evidence that two-level arthroplasty does not fare as well. Hybrid fusion is an attempt to address two-level DDD by combining the advantages of a single-level ALIF with those of a single-level arthroplasty. 42 patients (25 females and 17 males) underwent Hybrid fusion and had a median follow-up of 26.3 months. The primary functional outcomes were assessed before and after surgery with Oswestry Disability Index and the visual analogue score of the back and legs. Patients were divided into four groups according to the percentage improvement between preop and postop ODI scores. A total of 42 patients underwent a hybrid fusion as follows: 35 L5-S1 ALIF/L4-5 prosthesis, 3 L4-5 ALIF/L3-4 prosthesis, 2 L5-S1 ALIF/L4-5 prosthesis/L3-4 prosthesis, 1 L5-S1 prosthesis/L4-5 ALIF, and 1 L5-S1 ALIF/L4-5 ALIF/L3-4 prosthesis. At 2-years clinical outcomes, mean reduction in ODI is 24.9 points (53.0% improvement compared to preop ODI). The visual analogue score for the back is 64.6% improvement. At 2-year clinical outcomes, Hybrid fusion is a viable surgical alternative for the treatment of two-level DDD in comparison with two-level TDA and with two-level fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19888610      PMCID: PMC2899811          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1182-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  34 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain.

Authors:  G B Andersson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-08-14       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Laparoscopic fusion of the lumbar spine: minimally invasive spine surgery. A prospective multicenter study evaluating open and laparoscopic lumbar fusion.

Authors:  J J Regan; H Yuan; P C McAfee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Hybrid constructs.

Authors:  Rudolf Bertagnoli; Patrick Tropiano; Jack Zigler; Armin Karg; Sandra Voigt
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 4.  Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000.

Authors:  J P Lemaire; W Skalli; F Lavaste; A Templier; F Mendes; A Diop; V Sauty; E Laloux
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions.

Authors:  J D Schlegel; J A Smith; R L Schleusener
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The effect of single-level, total disc arthroplasty on sagittal balance parameters: a prospective study.

Authors:  Jc Le Huec; Y Basso; H Mathews; A Mehbod; S Aunoble; T Friesem; T Zdeblick
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Lumbar total disc replacement. Seven to eleven-year follow-up.

Authors:  Patrick Tropiano; Russel C Huang; Federico P Girardi; Frank P Cammisa; Thierry Marnay
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  Y Shono; K Kaneda; K Abumi; P C McAfee; B W Cunningham
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion?

Authors:  Alan S Hilibrand; Matthew Robbins
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Lumbar spinal fusion. Outcome in relation to surgical methods, choice of implant and postoperative rehabilitation.

Authors:  Finn Bjarke Christensen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  2004-10
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2010.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  ALIF and total disc replacement versus 2-level circumferential fusion with TLIF: a prospective, randomized, clinical and radiological trial.

Authors:  Eike K Hoff; Patrick Strube; Matthias Pumberger; Robert K Zahn; Michael Putzier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Interspinous dynamic stabilization adjacent to fusion versus double-segment fusion for treatment of lumbar degenerative disease with a minimum follow-up of three years.

Authors:  Xiao-Long Chen; Li Guan; Yu-Zeng Liu; Jin-Cai Yang; Wen-Long Wang; Yong Hai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Retrieval analysis of PEEK rods for posterior fusion and motion preservation.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Todd H Lanman; Genymphas Higgs; Daniel W Macdonald; Sigurd H Berven; Jorge E Isaza; Eual Phillips; Marla J Steinbeck
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Sagittal balance parameters influence indications for lumbar disc arthroplasty or ALIF.

Authors:  N Pellet; S Aunoble; R Meyrat; J Rigal; J C Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Maverick total disc arthroplasty performs well at 10 years follow-up: a prospective study with HRQL and balance analysis.

Authors:  N Plais; X Thevenot; A Cogniet; J Rigal; J C Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

8.  Combined Aorto-Iliac and Anterior Lumbar Spine Reconstruction: A Case Series.

Authors:  Matthew Scott-Young; Laurence McEntee; James Furness; Ben Schram; Wayne Hing; David Grosser; Mario Zotti
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-15

Review 9.  What can we learn from long-term studies on chronic low back pain? A scoping review.

Authors:  Alisa L Dutmer; Remko Soer; André P Wolff; Michiel F Reneman; Maarten H Coppes; Henrica R Schiphorst Preuper
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Rare complications of osteolysis and periprosthetic tissue reactions after hybrid and non-hybrid total disc replacement.

Authors:  Sai Y Veruva; Todd H Lanman; Josa A Hanzlik; Steven M Kurtz; Marla J Steinbeck
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.