Literature DB >> 11413426

Lumbar sagittal alignment after fusion with a threaded interbody cage.

J A Goldstein1, M J Macenski, S L Griffith, P C McAfee.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Records of 111 patients randomly selected from a population who received an interbody fusion cage during a clinical Investigation Device Exemption trial (BAK/L) yielded 126 operative levels and were retrospectively assessed.
OBJECTIVES: This study examined lumbar spine sagittal alignment and clinical outcomes before and 2 years after fusion surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar lordosis is important in spinal sagittal alignment and balance, especially the L4-S1 area. Perceived consensus is that anatomically correct lumbar lordosis is desired and that a loss of lumbar lordosis may lead to spine pathology. There is little information on lumbar lordosis after interbody fusion.
METHODS: A random sample of 111 patients who received a cylindrical cage implant (total pool of 947 patients) yielded 126 operative lumbar segments. There were 52 posterior approaches and 59 anterior approaches, and all cages were placed in the L4-L5 or L5-S1 levels. Preoperative and 2-year follow-up lateral radiographs were measured for segmental lordosis. Cage position was measured relative to the posterior longitudinal ligament. Segmental lordotic change was correlated to clinical outcome at the 2-year follow-up.
RESULTS: Preoperative lordosis was different as a function of surgical approach. There was a significant 2-year decrease in lordosis with the posterior approach group; however, all intervertebral angles were within typical ranges. Clinical outcomes were significantly improved 2 years postsurgery. There was no correlation between changes in lordosis and clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Interbody lumbar fusion with a threaded cylindrical cage does not appear to have any clinically relevant effects on segmental lordosis, which is maintained within anatomically normal levels. Clinical outcome measures show significant postsurgery improvement, and changes in lordotic angles are not predictive of clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11413426     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200105150-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

Review 1.  Evidence showing the relationship between sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of degenerative spinal diseases: a literature review.

Authors:  Jean-Charles Le Huec; Antonio Faundez; Dennis Dominguez; Pierre Hoffmeyer; Stéphane Aunoble
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  An 11-year minimum follow-up of the Charite III lumbar disc replacement for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Shi-bao Lu; Yong Hai; Chao Kong; Qing-yi Wang; Qingjun Su; Lei Zang; Nan Kang; Xiang-long Meng; Yu Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The effect of single-level, total disc arthroplasty on sagittal balance parameters: a prospective study.

Authors:  Jc Le Huec; Y Basso; H Mathews; A Mehbod; S Aunoble; T Friesem; T Zdeblick
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Factors influencing segmental lumbar lordosis after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion.

Authors:  Christopher K Kepler; Russel C Huang; Amit K Sharma; Dennis S Meredith; Ochuko Metitiri; Andrew A Sama; Federico P Girardi; Frank P Cammisa
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.071

5.  Radiographic results of single level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spine disease: focusing on changes of segmental lordosis in fusion segment.

Authors:  Sang-Bum Kim; Taek-Soo Jeon; Youn-Moo Heo; Woo-Suk Lee; Jin-Woong Yi; Tae-Kyun Kim; Cheol-Mog Hwang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-11-25

6.  Normative values for the spine shape parameters using 3D standing analysis from a database of 268 asymptomatic Caucasian and Japanese subjects.

Authors:  Jean Charles Le Huec; Kazuhiro Hasegawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comparison between Instrumented Mini-TLIF and Instrumented Circumferential Fusion in Adult Low-Grade Lytic Spondylolisthesis : Can Mini-TLIF with PPF Replace Circumferential Fusion?

Authors:  Jin-Sung Kim; Dong-Hyun Kim; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-02-28

8.  Georg Schmorl Prize of the German Spine Society (DWG) 2017: correction of spino-pelvic alignment with relordosing mono- and bisegmental TLIF spondylodesis.

Authors:  Frederick Galla; Dirk Wähnert; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The impact of sagittal balance on clinical results after posterior interbody fusion for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mi Kyung Kim; Sun-Ho Lee; Eun-Sang Kim; Whan Eoh; Sung-Soo Chung; Chong-Suh Lee
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Outcomes and complications following posterior long lumbar fusions exceeding three levels.

Authors:  Yusuke Nishimura; Masahito Hara; Yasuhiro Nakajima; Shoichi Haimoto; Yuu Yamamoto; Toshihiko Wakabayashi
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.