Literature DB >> 26873749

The effect of head up tilting on bioreactance cardiac output and stroke volume readings using suprasternal transcutaneous Doppler as a control in healthy young adults.

Jie Zhang1, Lester A H Critchley2, Daniel C W Lee3, Kim S Khaw2, Shara W Y Lee4.   

Abstract

To compare the performance of a bioreactance cardiac output (CO) monitor (NICOM) and transcutaneous Doppler (USCOM) during head up tilting (HUT). Healthy young adult subjects, age 22 ± 1 years, 7 male and 7 female, were tilted over 3-5 s from supine to 70° HUT, 30° HUT and back to supine. Positions were held for 3 min. Simultaneous readings of NICOM and USCOM were performed 30 s into each new position. Mean blood pressure (MBP), heart rate (HR), CO and stroke volume (SV), and thoracic fluid content (TFC) were recorded. Bland-Altman, percentage changes and analysis of variance for repeated measures were used for statistical analysis. Pre-tilt NICOM CO and SV readings (6.1 ± 1.0 L/min and 113 ± 25 ml) were higher than those from USCOM (4.1 ± 0.6 L/min and 77 ± 9 ml) (P < 0.001). Bland-Altman limits of agreement for CO were wide with a percentage error of 38 %. HUT increased MBP and HR (P < 0.001). CO and SV readings decreased with HUT. However, the percentage changes in USCOM and NICOM readings did not concur (P < 0.001). Whereas USCOM provided gravitational effect proportional changes in SV readings of 23 ± 15 % (30° half tilt) and 44 ± 11 % (70° near full tilt), NICOM changes did not being 28 ± 10 and 33 ± 11 %. TFC decreased linearly with HUT. The NICOM does not provide linear changes in SV as predicted by physiology when patients are tilted. Furthermore there is a lack of agreement with USCOM measurements at baseline and during tilting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioreactance; Cardiac output; Doppler; Head up tilting

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26873749     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9835-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  28 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Fluid responsiveness predicted by noninvasive bioreactance-based passive leg raise test.

Authors:  Brahim Benomar; Alexandre Ouattara; Philippe Estagnasie; Alain Brusset; Pierre Squara
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Bioreactance is not reliable for estimating cardiac output and the effects of passive leg raising in critically ill patients.

Authors:  E Kupersztych-Hagege; J-L Teboul; A Artigas; A Talbot; C Sabatier; C Richard; X Monnet
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 4.  Monitoring needs and goal-directed fluid therapy within an enhanced recovery program.

Authors:  Gary Minto; Michael J Scott; Timothy E Miller
Journal:  Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  2015-03

5.  A comparison of noninvasive bioreactance with oesophageal Doppler estimation of stroke volume during open abdominal surgery: an observational study.

Authors:  Daniel H Conway; Osman A Hussain; Iain Gall
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  USCOM-window to the circulation: utility of supra-sternal Doppler in an elderly anaesthetized patient for a robotic cystectomy.

Authors:  Lester A H Critchley; Li Huang
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Hypotension induced by passive head-up tilt: endocrine and circulatory mechanisms.

Authors:  K Sander-Jensen; N H Secher; A Astrup; N J Christensen; J Giese; T W Schwartz; J Warberg; P Bie
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1986-10

8.  The use of bioreactance and carotid Doppler to determine volume responsiveness and blood flow redistribution following passive leg raising in hemodynamically unstable patients.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Alex Levitov; Alisha Young; Lois Andrews
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Passive leg raising.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Bioreactance: a new tool for cardiac output and thoracic fluid content monitoring during hemodialysis.

Authors:  Niloufar Kossari; Gilles Hufnagel; Pierre Squara
Journal:  Hemodial Int       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 1.812

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2016 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A Critchley; Steffen Rex; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Innovative noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring: curb your enthusiasm after initial validation studies and evaluate the technologies' clinical applicability.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Julia Y Wagner
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  An optimal control approach for blood pressure regulation during head-up tilt.

Authors:  Nakeya D Williams; Jesper Mehlsen; Hien T Tran; Mette S Olufsen
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Wearing compression tights post-exercise enhances recovery hemodynamics and subsequent cycling performance.

Authors:  Daniel C W Lee; Sinead Sheridan; Ajmol Ali; Damien Sutanto; Stephen H S Wong
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Temporal concordance between pulse contour analysis, bioreactance and carotid doppler during rapid preload changes.

Authors:  Jon-Émile S Kenny; Igor Barjaktarevic; Andrew M Eibl; Matthew Parrotta; Bradley F Long; Mai Elfarnawany; Joseph K Eibl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.