| Literature DB >> 15727514 |
Christine N Smith1, Robert E Clark, Joseph R Manns, Larry R Squire.
Abstract
There has been debate about whether differential delay eyeblink conditioning can be acquired without awareness of the stimulus contingencies. In 4 experiments, the authors reexamined this question. Older participants were tested with a tone and white noise (Experiment 1) or with 2 tones (Experiment 2). In addition, younger participants were tested with 2 tones (Experiment 3) or with 2 tones plus the parameters from an earlier study that had reported a relationship between conditioning and awareness (Experiment 4). Participants who were designated aware of the stimulus contingencies and participants who were designated unaware exhibited equivalent levels of differential eyeblink conditioning. Awareness of stimulus contingencies is not required for differential delay eyeblink conditioning when simple conditioned stimuli are used. Copyright 2005 APA.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15727514 PMCID: PMC2773180 DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.119.1.78
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Neurosci ISSN: 0735-7044 Impact factor: 1.912