Literature DB >> 12475713

Classical conditioning, awareness, and brain systems.

Robert E. Clark1, Joseph R. Manns, Larry R. Squire.   

Abstract

Memory is composed of several different abilities that are supported by different brain systems. The distinction between declarative (conscious) and nondeclarative (non-conscious) memory has proved useful in understanding the nature of eyeblink classical conditioning - the best understood example of classical conditioning in vertebrates. In delay conditioning, the standard procedure, conditioning depends on the cerebellum and brainstem and is intact in amnesia. Trace conditioning, a variant of the standard procedure, depends additionally on the hippocampus and neocortex and is impaired in amnesia. Recent studies have sharpened the contrast between delay and trace conditioning by exploring the importance of awareness. We discuss these new findings in relation to the brain systems supporting eyeblink conditioning and suggest why awareness is important for trace conditioning but not for delay conditioning.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 12475713     DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)02041-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  66 in total

1.  Differential acetylcholine release in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus during pavlovian trace and delay conditioning.

Authors:  M Melissa Flesher; Allen E Butt; Brandee L Kinney-Hurd
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Time-dependent reorganization of the brain components underlying memory retention in trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Kaori Takehara; Shigenori Kawahara; Yutaka Kirino
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Trace but not delay fear conditioning requires attention and the anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  C J Han; Colm M O'Tuathaigh; Laurent van Trigt; Jennifer J Quinn; Michael S Fanselow; Raymond Mongeau; Christof Koch; David J Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Temporal patterns of inputs to cerebellum necessary and sufficient for trace eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  Brian E Kalmbach; Tatsuya Ohyama; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Persistent activity in a cortical-to-subcortical circuit: bridging the temporal gap in trace eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  Jennifer J Siegel; Brian Kalmbach; Raymond A Chitwood; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  H.M.'s contributions to neuroscience: a review and autopsy studies.

Authors:  Jean C Augustinack; André J W van der Kouwe; David H Salat; Thomas Benner; Allison A Stevens; Jacopo Annese; Bruce Fischl; Matthew P Frosch; Suzanne Corkin
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.899

7.  Nonpharmacological amelioration of age-related learning deficits: the impact of hippocampal theta-triggered training.

Authors:  Yukiko Asaka; Kristin N Mauldin; Amy L Griffin; Matthew A Seager; Elizabeth Shurell; Stephen D Berry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Plasticity in the olfactory system: lessons for the neurobiology of memory.

Authors:  D A Wilson; A R Best; R M Sullivan
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.519

9.  The role of awareness in delay and trace fear conditioning in humans.

Authors:  David C Knight; Hanh T Nguyen; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Developmental changes in hippocampal associative coding.

Authors:  Mary E Goldsberry; Jangjin Kim; John H Freeman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.