Literature DB >> 30523574

Contingency awareness as a prerequisite for differential contextual fear conditioning.

Christian Baeuchl1,2, Michael Hoppstädter3,4, Patric Meyer3,4, Herta Flor3,4.   

Abstract

Contingency awareness during conditioning describes the phenomenon of becoming consciously aware of the association between a conditioned stimulus (CS) and an unconditioned stimulus (US). Despite the fact that contingency awareness is necessary for associative learning in some conditioning paradigms, its role in contextual fear conditioning, a variant that uses a context-CS (CTX) instead of a cue, has not been characterized thus far. We investigated if contingency awareness is a prerequisite for contextual fear conditioning and if subjects classified as aware differ from unaware subjects on a hemodynamic, autonomic, and behavioral level. We used a computer-generated picture context as CTX and slightly painful electric stimulation as US while we recorded brain responses by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and obtained skin conductance responses (SCR) and verbal ratings of emotional valence and arousal. SCR analyses revealed that only aware subjects became conditioned to the US-associated CTX (CTX+). Brain activity related to the CTX+ was more strongly pronounced in fear-associated areas like the insula in the aware relative to the unaware group. Finally, the hippocampus was functionally connected to the cingulate cortex and posterior medial frontal gyrus in aware subjects relative to unaware subjects. These task-related differential connectivity patterns suggest that information exchange between the hippocampus and regions involved in the expression of conditioned fear and decision uncertainty is crucial for the acquisition of contingency knowledge. This study demonstrates the importance of contingency awareness for contextual fear conditioning and points to the hippocampus as a potential mediator for contingency learning in contextual learning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contextual fear conditioning; Contingency awareness; Functional connectivity; Hippocampus; Neuropsychological testing; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30523574     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-00666-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  70 in total

Review 1.  Classical fear conditioning in functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  C Büchel; R J Dolan
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain.

Authors:  N Tzourio-Mazoyer; B Landeau; D Papathanassiou; F Crivello; O Etard; N Delcroix; B Mazoyer; M Joliot
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: empirical evidence and theoretical implications.

Authors:  Peter F Lovibond; David R Shanks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2002-01

4.  Interactions of prefrontal cortex in relation to awareness in sensory learning.

Authors:  A R McIntosh; M N Rajah; N J Lobaugh
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-28       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Classical conditioning, awareness, and brain systems.

Authors:  Robert E. Clark; Joseph R. Manns; Larry R. Squire
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Amygdala-hippocampal involvement in human aversive trace conditioning revealed through event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C Büchel; R J Dolan; J L Armony; K J Friston
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Awareness in classical differential eyeblink conditioning in young and aging humans.

Authors:  M G Knuttinen; J M Power; A R Preston; J F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Standard delay eyeblink classical conditioning is independent of awareness.

Authors:  Joseph R Manns; Robert E Clark; Larry R Squire
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2002-01

9.  Dissociating pain from its anticipation in the human brain.

Authors:  A Ploghaus; I Tracey; J S Gati; S Clare; R S Menon; P M Matthews; J N Rawlins
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Working memory and fear conditioning.

Authors:  Ronald McKell Carter; Constanze Hofstotter; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Christof Koch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

1.  Navigating the garden of forking paths for data exclusions in fear conditioning research.

Authors:  Tina B Lonsdorf; Maren Klingelhöfer-Jens; Marta Andreatta; Tom Beckers; Anastasia Chalkia; Anna Gerlicher; Valerie L Jentsch; Shira Meir Drexler; Gaetan Mertens; Jan Richter; Rachel Sjouwerman; Julia Wendt; Christian J Merz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Contingency awareness, aging, and the parietal lobe.

Authors:  Dominic T Cheng; Alyssa M Katzenelson; Monica L Faulkner; John F Disterhoft; John M Power; John E Desmond
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 5.133

3.  Observational learning of fear in real time procedure.

Authors:  Michał Szczepanik; Anna M Kaźmierowska; Jarosław M Michałowski; Marek Wypych; Andreas Olsson; Ewelina Knapska
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.