Literature DB >> 17079658

Experience-dependent eye movements, awareness, and hippocampus-dependent memory.

Christine N Smith1, Ramona O Hopkins, Larry R Squire.   

Abstract

We asked what kind of memory is operating when eye movements change as the result of experience. Participants viewed scenes that were either novel, repeated, or manipulated (i.e., a change was introduced in one region of the scene). Eye movements differed depending on the past viewing history of each scene. Participants made fewer fixations and sampled fewer regions when scenes were repeated than when scenes were novel. When scenes were altered, participants made more fixations in the altered region, spent more time looking at the altered region, and made more transitions into and out of the altered region than in unchanged (matched) regions in the repeated scenes. Importantly, these effects occurred only when individuals were aware that a change had occurred. Participants who were unaware that the scene had been altered looked at the changed scenes in the same way that they looked at repeated scenes. Thus, there was no indication that eye movements could reveal an unaware (unconscious) form of memory. Instead, eye movements reflected conscious memory of whether the scene was repeated or manipulated. The findings were the same when awareness was assessed after viewing all the scenes (experiment 1) and when awareness was assessed after each scene was presented (experiment 2). In experiment 3, memory-impaired patients with damage limited to the hippocampus were impaired at deciding whether scenes were novel, repeated, or manipulated. Thus, the ability to consciously recollect recent encounters with scenes reflects a form of hippocampus-dependent memory. The findings show that experience-dependent eye movements in response to altered scenes reflect conscious, declarative memory, and they support the link between aware memory, declarative memory, and hippocampus-dependent memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17079658      PMCID: PMC2424210          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3071-06.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  40 in total

1.  The visual paired-comparison task as a measure of declarative memory.

Authors:  J R Manns; C E Stark; L R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Perceptual learning, awareness, and the hippocampus.

Authors:  J R Manns; L R Squire
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  Single-cue delay eyeblink conditioning is unrelated to awareness.

Authors:  J R Manns; R E Clark; L Squire
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  The hippocampal/parahippocampal regions and recognition memory: insights from visual paired comparison versus object-delayed nonmatching in monkeys.

Authors:  Sarah Nemanic; Maria C Alvarado; Jocelyne Bachevalier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Relational learning with and without awareness: transitive inference using nonverbal stimuli in humans.

Authors:  A J Greene; B A Spellman; J A Dusek; H B Eichenbaum; W B Levy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-09

6.  Amnesia is a deficit in relational memory.

Authors:  J D Ryan; R R Althoff; S Whitlow; N J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-11

7.  A preliminary report on a new memory scale.

Authors:  F L Catalano
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1968-08

8.  Awareness in classical differential eyeblink conditioning in young and aging humans.

Authors:  M G Knuttinen; J M Power; A R Preston; J F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Spared discrimination and impaired reversal eyeblink conditioning in patients with temporal lobe amnesia.

Authors:  M C Carrillo; J D Gabrieli; R O Hopkins; R McGlinchey-Berroth; C B Fortier; R P Kesner; J F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Transitive inference and awareness in humans.

Authors:  Natasha Martin; Brent Alsop
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 1.777

View more
  44 in total

1.  After-training emotional interference may modulate sequence awareness in a serial reaction time task.

Authors:  Cigdem Onal-Hartmann; Mirta Fiorio; Reinhard Gentner; Daniel Zeller; Paul Pauli; Joseph Classen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Awareness of what is learned as a characteristic of hippocampus-dependent memory.

Authors:  Christine N Smith; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Hippocampal differentiation without recognition: an fMRI analysis of the contextual cueing task.

Authors:  Anthony J Greene; William L Gross; Catherine L Elsinger; Stephen M Rao
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Aging in rhesus macaques is associated with changes in novelty preference and altered saccade dynamics.

Authors:  Nathan Insel; María Luisa Ruiz-Luna; Michelle Permenter; Julie Vogt; Cynthia A Erickson; Carol A Barnes
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 5.  Memory systems do not divide on consciousness: Reinterpreting memory in terms of activation and binding.

Authors:  Lynne M Reder; Heekyeong Park; Paul D Kieffaber
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Eye movements support the link between conscious memory and medial temporal lobe function.

Authors:  Zhisen J Urgolites; Christine N Smith; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Students apply research methods to consumer decisions about cognitive enhancing drinks.

Authors:  Charles B Walters; Katherine G Hill; Anastasia R Zavilla; Cynthia A Erickson
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2014-10-15

8.  A nonparametric method for detecting fixations and saccades using cluster analysis: removing the need for arbitrary thresholds.

Authors:  Seth D König; Elizabeth A Buffalo
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 9.  Multiple memory systems are unnecessary to account for infant memory development: an ecological model.

Authors:  Carolyn Rovee-Collier; Kimberly Cuevas
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2009-01

10.  Why a neuromaturational model of memory fails: exuberant learning in early infancy.

Authors:  Carolyn Rovee-Collier; Amy Giles
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.