Literature DB >> 15692871

Quality assurance of clinical MRI scanners using ACR MRI phantom: preliminary results.

Chien-Chuan Chen1, Yung-Liang Wan, Yau-Yau Wai, Ho-Ling Liu.   

Abstract

Clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners play an important role in the diagnosis of diseases and management of patient treatment. Quality assurance (QA) of the clinical MRI scanners is mandatory to obtain optimal images in a modern hospital. In this report, the phantom test for the American College of Radiology (ACR) MRI accreditation is used as the essential part of the MRI QA protocols. Seven important assessments of MR image quality are included as follows: geometric accuracy, high-contrast resolution, slice thickness accuracy, slice position accuracy, image intensity uniformity, percent signal ghosting, and low-contrast object detectability. In addition, signal-to-noise ratio and central frequency are monitored as well. The MRI QA procedures were applied to four clinical MRI scanners in our institute twice within 3 months. According to the QA results, the service engineers were more efficient in solving scanners problems when the ACR phantom test was run.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15692871      PMCID: PMC3047180          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-004-1023-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  11 in total

1.  [Definition criteria for a magnetic resonance quality assurance program: multicenter study].

Authors:  L Mascaro; S Strocchi; P Colombo; M Del Corona; A M Baldassarri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Quality assurance for MRI: practical experience.

Authors:  M J Firbank; R M Harrison; E D Williams; A Coulthard
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Automatic quality assessment protocol for MRI equipment.

Authors:  P Bourel; D Gibon; E Coste; V Daanen; J Rousseau
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  [Results of the quality control of magnetic resonance images].

Authors:  A Duina; L Mascaro; R Moretti; S Belletti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  [Qualitative control over quantitative MR tomography: in vitro and in vivo checks on relaxation time measurements].

Authors:  A Steudel; F Träber; T Krahe; O Schiffmann; T Harder
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1990-06

6.  Evaluation of relaxation time measurements by magnetic resonance imaging. A phantom study.

Authors:  L Kjaer; C Thomsen; O Henriksen; P Ring; M Stubgaard; E J Pedersen
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.990

7.  Automated analysis of multiple performance characteristics in magnetic resonance imaging systems.

Authors:  M M Covell; D O Hearshen; P L Carson; T P Chenevert; P Shreve; A M Aisen; F L Bookstein; B W Murphy; W Martel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  [Quality control in magnetic resonance for clinical use].

Authors:  F Podo
Journal:  Ann Ist Super Sanita       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.663

9.  The use of power images to perform quantitative analysis on low SNR MR images.

Authors:  A J Miller; P M Joseph
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  MRI scanner variability studies using a semi-automated analysis system.

Authors:  R J Hyde; J H Ellis; E A Gardner; Y Zhang; P L Carson
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  31 in total

1.  Multi-center reproducibility of structural, diffusion tensor, and resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging measures.

Authors:  S Deprez; Michiel B de Ruiter; S Bogaert; R Peeters; J Belderbos; D De Ruysscher; S Schagen; S Sunaert; P Pullens; E Achten
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Image quality assessment of a 1.5T dedicated magnetic resonance-simulator for radiotherapy with a flexible radio frequency coil setting using the standard American College of Radiology magnetic resonance imaging phantom test.

Authors:  Oi Lei Wong; Jing Yuan; Siu Ki Yu; Kin Yin Cheung
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-04

3.  Wide slab is useful for routine quality control of MRI slice thickness.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Ishimori; Masahiko Monma; Hiraku Kawamura
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-06-19

4.  How to design and construct a 3D-printed human head phantom.

Authors:  Sossena Wood; Tiago Martins; Tamer S Ibrahim
Journal:  J 3D Print Med       Date:  2019-08-21

5.  Variations in optical coherence tomography resolution and uniformity: a multi-system performance comparison.

Authors:  Anthony Fouad; T Joshua Pfefer; Chao-Wei Chen; Wei Gong; Anant Agrawal; Peter H Tomlins; Peter D Woolliams; Rebekah A Drezek; Yu Chen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Ameliorating slice gaps in multislice magnetic resonance images: an interpolation scheme.

Authors:  Nasser H Kashou; Mark A Smith; Cynthia J Roberts
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Automating PACS Quality Control with the Vanderbilt Image Processing Enterprise Resource.

Authors:  Michael L Esparza; E Brian Welch; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2012-02-12

Review 8.  Standardization of Small Animal Imaging-Current Status and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Julia G Mannheim; Firat Kara; Janine Doorduin; Kerstin Fuchs; Gerald Reischl; Sayuan Liang; Marleen Verhoye; Felix Gremse; Laura Mezzanotte; Marc C Huisman
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 9.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

10.  Measurement of MRI scanner performance with the ADNI phantom.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Gunter; Matt A Bernstein; Brett J Borowski; Chadwick P Ward; Paula J Britson; Joel P Felmlee; Norbert Schuff; Michael Weiner; Clifford R Jack
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.