Literature DB >> 10844863

Quality assurance for MRI: practical experience.

M J Firbank1, R M Harrison, E D Williams, A Coulthard.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to propose guidelines for quality assurance (QA) in MRI, based on a comprehensive assessment of QA parameters undertaken on a busy clinical MRI scanner over the course of 1 year. QA phantoms supplied by the scanner manufacturer were used together with the Eurospin MRI phantom set. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and image uniformity were measured daily from spin echo images acquired using a quadrature send-receive head coil and from a gradient echo sequence using the Helmholtz body coil. The voltage of the transmit radiofrequency (RF) amplifier was noted. Monthly measurements of slice thickness, geometric distortion, slice position, image resolution and image ghosting were acquired using the head coil. In addition, SNR was measured monthly on a selection of commonly used coils. Apart from some drift of the RF amplifier voltage, all measurements were within acceptable limits and were stable over the course of 1 year. Satisfactory measurements of SNR were possible using the simple phantom supplied with the scanner. The SNR, geometric distortion and RF amplifier voltage are simple to determine and can be measured in less than 15 min by the scanner operator, using the scanner software. Weekly recording of these parameters is recommended for busy clinical MRI scanners, as this should allow deviations from acceptable limits to be identified early. Such in-house checks can usefully be compared with the less frequent estimations performed by the service engineer. Comprehensive QA routines are discussed for systems used for quantitative measurements.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10844863     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.73.868.10844863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  23 in total

1.  MRI quality control: six imagers studied using eleven unified image quality parameters.

Authors:  T Ihalainen; O Sipilä; S Savolainen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Quality assurance of clinical MRI scanners using ACR MRI phantom: preliminary results.

Authors:  Chien-Chuan Chen; Yung-Liang Wan; Yau-Yau Wai; Ho-Ling Liu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  An Automatic Image Processing Workflow for Daily Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quality Assurance.

Authors:  Juha I Peltonen; Teemu Mäkelä; Alexey Sofiev; Eero Salli
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Wide slab is useful for routine quality control of MRI slice thickness.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Ishimori; Masahiko Monma; Hiraku Kawamura
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-06-19

5.  Improved wedge method for the measurement of sub-millimeter slice thicknesses in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Tsutomu Kanazawa; Masaki Ohkubo; Tatsuya Kondo; Takayuki Miyazawa; Shoichi Inagawa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-09-06

6.  Assessment of atherosclerotic plaque burden with an elastin-specific magnetic resonance contrast agent.

Authors:  Marcus R Makowski; Andrea J Wiethoff; Ulrike Blume; Friederike Cuello; Alice Warley; Christian H P Jansen; Eike Nagel; Reza Razavi; David C Onthank; Richard R Cesati; Michael S Marber; Tobias Schaeffter; Alberto Smith; Simon P Robinson; René M Botnar
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  The role of latency period in quality management for free-breathing coronary wall MRI.

Authors:  Kai Lin; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Ying Liu; Xiaoming Bi; Biao Lu; Debiao Li; James C Carr
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Measurement of MRI scanner performance with the ADNI phantom.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Gunter; Matt A Bernstein; Brett J Borowski; Chadwick P Ward; Paula J Britson; Joel P Felmlee; Norbert Schuff; Michael Weiner; Clifford R Jack
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Imaging vascular function for early stage clinical trials using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M O Leach; B Morgan; P S Tofts; D L Buckley; W Huang; M A Horsfield; T L Chenevert; D J Collins; A Jackson; D Lomas; B Whitcher; L Clarke; R Plummer; I Judson; R Jones; R Alonzi; T Brunner; D M Koh; P Murphy; J C Waterton; G Parker; M J Graves; T W J Scheenen; T W Redpath; M Orton; G Karczmar; H Huisman; J Barentsz; A Padhani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Differential connectivity of perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices within human hippocampal subregions revealed by high-resolution functional imaging.

Authors:  Laura A Libby; Arne D Ekstrom; J Daniel Ragland; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.