S Deprez1,2, Michiel B de Ruiter3, S Bogaert4, R Peeters1,2, J Belderbos5, D De Ruysscher6,7, S Schagen8, S Sunaert1,2, P Pullens9, E Achten4. 1. Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 2. Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 3. Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.d.ruiter@nki.nl. 4. Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro clinic), GROW School, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 7. Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 8. Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 9. Department of Radiology, University Hospital Antwerp & Antwerp University, Edegem, Belgium.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess multi-center reproducibility and longitudinal consistency of MRI imaging measurements, as part of a phase III longitudinal multi-center study comparing the neurotoxic effect following prophylactic cranial irradiation with hippocampal avoidance (HA-PCI), in comparison with conventional PCI in patients with small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: Harmonized MRI acquisition protocols from six participating sites and two different vendors were compared using both physical and human phantoms. We assessed variability across sites and time points by evaluating various phantoms and data including hippocampal volume, diffusion metrics, and resting-state fMRI, from two healthy volunteers. RESULTS: We report average coefficients of variation (CV) below 5% for intrascanner, intravendor, and intervendor reproducibility for both structural and diffusion imaging metrics, except for diffusion metrics obtained from tractography with average CVs ranging up to 7.8%. Additionally, resting-state fMRI showed stable temporal SNR and reliable generation of subjects DMN across vendors and time points. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the presented multi-site MRI acquisition protocol can be used in a longitudinal study design and that pooling of the acquired data as part of the phase III longitudinal HA-PCI project is possible with careful monitoring of the results of the half-yearly QA assessment to follow-up on potential scanner-related longitudinal changes in image quality.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess multi-center reproducibility and longitudinal consistency of MRI imaging measurements, as part of a phase III longitudinal multi-center study comparing the neurotoxic effect following prophylactic cranial irradiation with hippocampal avoidance (HA-PCI), in comparison with conventional PCI in patients with small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: Harmonized MRI acquisition protocols from six participating sites and two different vendors were compared using both physical and human phantoms. We assessed variability across sites and time points by evaluating various phantoms and data including hippocampal volume, diffusion metrics, and resting-state fMRI, from two healthy volunteers. RESULTS: We report average coefficients of variation (CV) below 5% for intrascanner, intravendor, and intervendor reproducibility for both structural and diffusion imaging metrics, except for diffusion metrics obtained from tractography with average CVs ranging up to 7.8%. Additionally, resting-state fMRI showed stable temporal SNR and reliable generation of subjects DMN across vendors and time points. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the presented multi-site MRI acquisition protocol can be used in a longitudinal study design and that pooling of the acquired data as part of the phase III longitudinal HA-PCI project is possible with careful monitoring of the results of the half-yearly QA assessment to follow-up on potential scanner-related longitudinal changes in image quality.
Authors: Stefan J Teipel; Sigrid Reuter; Bram Stieltjes; Julio Acosta-Cabronero; Ulrike Ernemann; Andreas Fellgiebel; Massimo Filippi; Giovanni Frisoni; Frank Hentschel; Frank Jessen; Stefan Klöppel; Thomas Meindl; Petra J W Pouwels; Karl-Heinz Hauenstein; Harald Hampel Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: R J Fox; K Sakaie; J-C Lee; J P Debbins; Y Liu; D L Arnold; E R Melhem; C H Smith; M D Philips; M Lowe; E Fisher Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-12-15 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Dariya I Malyarenko; David Newitt; Lisa J Wilmes; Alina Tudorica; Karl G Helmer; Lori R Arlinghaus; Michael A Jacobs; Guido Jajamovich; Bachir Taouli; Thomas E Yankeelov; Wei Huang; Thomas L Chenevert Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-05-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jorge Jovicich; Silvester Czanner; Xiao Han; David Salat; Andre van der Kouwe; Brian Quinn; Jenni Pacheco; Marilyn Albert; Ronald Killiany; Deborah Blacker; Paul Maguire; Diana Rosas; Nikos Makris; Randy Gollub; Anders Dale; Bradford C Dickerson; Bruce Fischl Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-02-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Christian Vollmar; Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh; Gareth J Barker; Mark R Symms; Pamela Thompson; Veena Kumari; John S Duncan; Mark P Richardson; Matthias J Koepp Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-03-23 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Matthew Grech-Sollars; Patrick W Hales; Keiko Miyazaki; Felix Raschke; Daniel Rodriguez; Martin Wilson; Simrandip K Gill; Tina Banks; Dawn E Saunders; Jonathan D Clayden; Matt N Gwilliam; Thomas R Barrick; Paul S Morgan; Nigel P Davies; James Rossiter; Dorothee P Auer; Richard Grundy; Martin O Leach; Franklyn A Howe; Andrew C Peet; Chris A Clark Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Colin Hawco; Joseph D Viviano; Sofia Chavez; Erin W Dickie; Navona Calarco; Peter Kochunov; Miklos Argyelan; Jessica A Turner; Anil K Malhotra; Robert W Buchanan; Aristotle N Voineskos Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2018-06-09 Impact factor: 2.376
Authors: Colin Hawco; Erin W Dickie; Gabrielle Herman; Jessica A Turner; Miklos Argyelan; Anil K Malhotra; Robert W Buchanan; Aristotle N Voineskos Journal: Sci Data Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 8.501
Authors: Thiago J R Rezende; Brunno M Campos; Johnny Hsu; Yue Li; Can Ceritoglu; Kwame Kutten; Marcondes C França Junior; Susumu Mori; Michael I Miller; Andreia V Faria Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 2.708