Literature DB >> 24357910

Automating PACS Quality Control with the Vanderbilt Image Processing Enterprise Resource.

Michael L Esparza1, E Brian Welch2, Bennett A Landman3.   

Abstract

Precise image acquisition is an integral part of modern patient care and medical imaging research. Periodic quality control using standardized protocols and phantoms ensures that scanners are operating according to specifications, yet such procedures do not ensure that individual datasets are free from corruption-for example due to patient motion, transient interference, or physiological variability. If unacceptable artifacts are noticed during scanning, a technologist can repeat a procedure. Yet, substantial delays may be incurred if a problematic scan is not noticed until a radiologist reads the scans or an automated algorithm fails. Given scores of slices in typical three-dimensional scans and wide-variety of potential use cases, a technologist cannot practically be expected inspect all images. In large-scale research, automated pipeline systems have had great success in achieving high throughput. However, clinical and institutional workflows are largely based on DICOM and PACS technologies; these systems are not readily compatible with research systems due to security and privacy restrictions. Hence, quantitative quality control has been relegated to individual investigators and too often neglected. Herein, we propose a scalable system, the Vanderbilt Image Processing Enterprise Resource-VIPER, to integrate modular quality control and image analysis routines with a standard PACS configuration. This server unifies image processing routines across an institutional level and provides a simple interface so that investigators can collaborate to deploy new analysis technologies. VIPER integrates with high performance computing environments has successfully analyzed all standard scans from our institutional research center over the course of the last 18 months.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automated Image Processing; DICOM; PACS; Quality Control

Year:  2012        PMID: 24357910      PMCID: PMC3865245          DOI: 10.1117/12.910800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  18 in total

1.  Quality control for functional magnetic resonance imaging using automated data analysis and Shewhart charting.

Authors:  A Simmons; E Moore; S C Williams
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  The LONI Pipeline Processing Environment.

Authors:  David E Rex; Jeffrey Q Ma; Arthur W Toga
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  E-neuroscience: challenges and triumphs in integrating distributed data from molecules to brains.

Authors:  Maryann E Martone; Amarnath Gupta; Mark H Ellisman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Quality assurance of clinical MRI scanners using ACR MRI phantom: preliminary results.

Authors:  Chien-Chuan Chen; Yung-Liang Wan; Yau-Yau Wai; Ho-Ling Liu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Automated quality assurance routines for fMRI data applied to a multicenter study.

Authors:  Tony Stöcker; Frank Schneider; Martina Klein; Ute Habel; Thilo Kellermann; Karl Zilles; N Jon Shah
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Report on a multicenter fMRI quality assurance protocol.

Authors:  Lee Friedman; Gary H Glover
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  No-reference image quality metrics for structural MRI.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Woodard; Monica P Carley-Spencer
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2006

8.  The Extensible Neuroimaging Archive Toolkit: an informatics platform for managing, exploring, and sharing neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Daniel S Marcus; Timothy R Olsen; Mohana Ramaratnam; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2007

9.  The Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG<sup>TM</sup>).

Authors:  David Fenstermacher; Craig Street; Tara McSherry; Vishal Nayak; Casey Overby; Michael Feldman
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2005

10.  The Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG): pioneering an expansive network of information and tools for collaborative cancer research.

Authors:  Kerry K Kakazu; Leo W K Cheung; Wilkens Lynne
Journal:  Hawaii Med J       Date:  2004-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  An Automatic Image Processing Workflow for Daily Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quality Assurance.

Authors:  Juha I Peltonen; Teemu Mäkelä; Alexey Sofiev; Eero Salli
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Integration of XNAT/PACS, DICOM, and Research Software for Automated Multi-modal Image Analysis.

Authors:  Yurui Gao; Scott S Burns; Carolyn B Lauzon; Andrew E Fong; Terry A James; Joel F Lubar; Robert W Thatcher; David A Twillie; Michael D Wirt; Marc A Zola; Bret W Logan; Adam W Anderson; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2013-03-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.