Literature DB >> 25071949

Variations in optical coherence tomography resolution and uniformity: a multi-system performance comparison.

Anthony Fouad1, T Joshua Pfefer2, Chao-Wei Chen1, Wei Gong3, Anant Agrawal2, Peter H Tomlins4, Peter D Woolliams5, Rebekah A Drezek6, Yu Chen7.   

Abstract

Point spread function (PSF) phantoms based on unstructured distributions of sub-resolution particles in a transparent matrix have been demonstrated as a useful tool for evaluating resolution and its spatial variation across image volumes in optical coherence tomography (OCT) systems. Measurements based on PSF phantoms have the potential to become a standard test method for consistent, objective and quantitative inter-comparison of OCT system performance. Towards this end, we have evaluated three PSF phantoms and investigated their ability to compare the performance of four OCT systems. The phantoms are based on 260-nm-diameter gold nanoshells, 400-nm-diameter iron oxide particles and 1.5-micron-diameter silica particles. The OCT systems included spectral-domain and swept source systems in free-beam geometries as well as a time-domain system in both free-beam and fiberoptic probe geometries. Results indicated that iron oxide particles and gold nanoshells were most effective for measuring spatial variations in the magnitude and shape of PSFs across the image volume. The intensity of individual particles was also used to evaluate spatial variations in signal intensity uniformity. Significant system-to-system differences in resolution and signal intensity and their spatial variation were readily quantified. The phantoms proved useful for identification and characterization of irregularities such as astigmatism. Our multi-system results provide evidence of the practical utility of PSF-phantom-based test methods for quantitative inter-comparison of OCT system resolution and signal uniformity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (110.3000) Image quality assessment; (110.4850) Optical transfer functions; (170.4500) Optical coherence tomography; (350.4800) Optical standards and testing

Year:  2014        PMID: 25071949      PMCID: PMC4102349          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.5.002066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  19 in total

1.  Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice.

Authors:  Eric A Berns; R Edward Hendrick; Gary R Cutter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Structured three-dimensional optical phantom for optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Andrea Curatolo; Brendan F Kennedy; David D Sampson
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Three-dimensional characterization of optical coherence tomography point spread functions with a nanoparticle-embedded phantom.

Authors:  Anant Agrawal; T Joshua Pfefer; Naureen Gilani; Rebekah Drezek
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.776

4.  Quality assurance of clinical MRI scanners using ACR MRI phantom: preliminary results.

Authors:  Chien-Chuan Chen; Yung-Liang Wan; Yau-Yau Wai; Ho-Ling Liu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Influence of optical properties on two-photon fluorescence imaging in turbid samples.

Authors:  A K Dunn; V P Wallace; M Coleno; M W Berns; B J Tromberg
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 1.980

6.  Foveal fine structure in retinopathy of prematurity: an adaptive optics Fourier domain optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Daniel X Hammer; Nicusor V Iftimia; R Daniel Ferguson; Chad E Bigelow; Teoman E Ustun; Amber M Barnaby; Anne B Fulton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Ultrahigh-resolution high-speed retinal imaging using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Barry Cense; Nader Nassif; Teresa Chen; Mark Pierce; Seok-Hyun Yun; B Park; Brett Bouma; Guillermo Tearney; Johannes de Boer
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2004-05-31       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Automated quantification of microstructural dimensions of the human kidney using optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Authors:  Qian Li; Maristela L Onozato; Peter M Andrews; Chao-Wei Chen; Andrew Paek; Renee Naphas; Shuai Yuan; James Jiang; Alex Cable; Yu Chen
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Review of tissue simulating phantoms with controllable optical, mechanical and structural properties for use in optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Guy Lamouche; Brendan F Kennedy; Kelsey M Kennedy; Charles-Etienne Bisaillon; Andrea Curatolo; Gord Campbell; Valérie Pazos; David D Sampson
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Characterizing the point spread function of retinal OCT devices with a model eye-based phantom.

Authors:  Anant Agrawal; Megan Connors; Alexander Beylin; Chia-Pin Liang; David Barton; Yu Chen; Rebekah A Drezek; T Joshua Pfefer
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  5 in total

1.  Tissue-mimicking phantoms for performance evaluation of photoacoustic microscopy systems.

Authors:  Hsun-Chia Hsu; Keith A Wear; T Joshua Pfefer; William C Vogt
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Novel biomarker of sphericity and cylindricity indices in volume-rendering optical coherence tomography angiography in normal and diabetic eyes: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Peter M Maloca; Richard F Spaide; Emanuel Ramos de Carvalho; Harald P Studer; Pascal W Hasler; Hendrik P N Scholl; Tjebo F C Heeren; Julia Schottenhamml; Konstantinos Balaskas; Adnan Tufail; Catherine Egan
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Longitudinal correlation of 3D OCT to detect early stage erosion in bovine enamel.

Authors:  Abdirahman Aden; Paul Anderson; Gary R Burnett; Richard J M Lynch; Peter H Tomlins
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Micron resolution, high-fidelity three-dimensional vascular optical imaging phantoms.

Authors:  Callum D Little; Radhika K Poduval; Richard Caulfield; Sacha Noimark; Richard J Colchester; Chris D Loder; Manish K Tiwari; Roby D Rakhit; Ioannis Papakonstantinou; Adrien E Desjardins
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Optical coherence tomography systems for evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic reconstructions.

Authors:  Hiba Al-Imam; Ana R Benetti; Pete Tomlins; Klaus Gotfredsen
Journal:  Biomater Investig Dent       Date:  2022-09-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.